Literature DB >> 27269944

Efficacy of High-Intensity Local Treatment for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: A Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis From the National Cancer Data Base.

Thomas Seisen1, Maxine Sun1, Jeffrey J Leow1, Mark A Preston1, Alexander P Cole1, Francisco Gelpi-Hammerschmidt1, Nawar Hanna1, Christian P Meyer1, Adam S Kibel1, Stuart R Lipsitz1, Paul L Nguyen1, Joaquim Bellmunt1, Toni K Choueiri1, Quoc-Dien Trinh1.   

Abstract

Purpose Evidence from studies of other malignancies has indicated that aggressive local treatment (LT), even in the presence of metastatic disease, is beneficial. Against a backdrop of stagnant mortality rates for metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (mUCB) at presentation, we hypothesized that high-intensity LT of primary tumor burden, defined as the receipt of radical cystectomy or ≥ 50 Gy of radiation therapy delivered to the bladder, affects overall survival (OS). Patients and Methods We identified 3,753 patients within the National Cancer Data Base who received multiagent systemic chemotherapy combined with high-intensity versus conservative LT for primary mUCB. Patients who received no LT, transurethral resection of the bladder tumor alone, or < 50 Gy of radiation therapy delivered to the bladder were included in the conservative LT group. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) -adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analyses were used to compare OS of patients who received high-intensity versus conservative LT. Results Overall, 297 (7.91%) and 3,456 (92.09%) patients with mUCB received high-intensity and conservative LT, respectively. IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves showed that median OS was significantly longer in the high-intensity LT group than in the conservative LT group (14.92 [interquartile range, 9.82 to 30.72] v 9.95 [interquartile range, 5.29 to 17.08] months, respectively; P < .001). Furthermore, in IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analysis, high-intensity LT was associated with a significant OS benefit (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.65; P < .001). Conclusion We report an OS benefit for individuals with mUCB treated with high-intensity versus conservative LT. Although the findings are subject to the usual biases related to the observational study design, these preliminary data warrant further consideration in randomized controlled trials, particularly given the poor prognosis associated with mUCB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27269944     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.66.7352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  17 in total

1.  Taking it to the HILT: High-intensity local treatment with radical cystectomy for metastatic bladder cancer.

Authors:  Adrian S Fairey; Niels-Erik Jacobsen
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  [When is surgical resection of the primary tumor indicated in metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and what is the scientific rationale?]

Authors:  J Ellinger; S Hauser; H Kübler; S C Müller
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  The Role of Surgery in Metastatic Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mohammad Abufaraj; Guido Dalbagni; Siamak Daneshmand; Simon Horenblas; Ashish M Kamat; Ryu Kanzaki; Alexandre R Zlotta; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Efficacy of Surgery in the Primary Tumor Site for Metastatic Urothelial Cancer: Analysis of an International, Multicenter, Multidisciplinary Database.

Authors:  Marco Moschini; Evanguelos Xylinas; Stefania Zamboni; Agostino Mattei; Günter Niegisch; Evan Y Yu; Aristotelis Bamias; Neeraj Agarwal; Srikala S Sridhar; Cora N Sternberg; Ulka N Vaishampayan; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Joaquim Bellmunt; Matthew D Galsky; Francesco Montorsi; Andrea Necchi
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-07-13

5.  Radical cystectomy in patients with disseminated disease: An assessment of perioperative outcomes using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

Authors:  Christopher Wallis; Suneil Khana; Mohammad Hajiha; Robert K Nam; Raj Satkunasivam
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  The role of metastatic burden in cytoreductive/consolidative radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Roger Li; Janet E Baack Kukreja; Mohamed A Seif; Firas G Petros; Matthew T Campbell; Justin V Nguyen; Graciela M Nogueras González; Ashish M Kamat; Louis L Pisters; Colin P Dinney; Neema Navai
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Survival Impact of Nephroureterectomy for De Novo Stage IV Nonmetastatic and Metastatic Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Wei-Yu Lin; Meng-Hung Lin; Yao-Hsu Yang; Wen-Cheng Chen; Cih-En Huang; Miao-Fen Chen; Chun-Te Wu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-26

8.  Metastasectomy in older adults with urothelial carcinoma: Population-based analysis of use and outcomes.

Authors:  Bishoy M Faltas; Renee L Gennarelli; Elena Elkin; Daniel P Nguyen; Jim Hu; Scott T Tagawa
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 3.498

9.  Efficacy and Safety of Locoregional Radiotherapy With Chemotherapy vs Chemotherapy Alone in De Novo Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Multicenter Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Rui You; You-Ping Liu; Pei-Yu Huang; Xiong Zou; Rui Sun; Yu-Xiang He; Yi-Shan Wu; Guo-Ping Shen; Hong-Dan Zhang; Chong-Yang Duan; Sze Huey Tan; Jing-Yu Cao; Ji-Bin Li; Yu-Long Xie; Yi-Nuan Zhang; Zhi-Qiang Wang; Qi Yang; Mei Lin; Rou Jiang; Meng-Xia Zhang; Yi-Jun Hua; Lin-Quan Tang; Ai-Hua Zhuang; Qiu-Yan Chen; Ling Guo; Hao-Yuan Mo; Yong Chen; Hai-Qiang Mai; Li Ling; Qing Liu; Melvin Lee Kiang Chua; Ming-Yuan Chen
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 31.777

10.  Combined high-intensity local treatment and systemic therapy in metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: An analysis of the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Zachary S Zumsteg; Michael Luu; Emi J Yoshida; Sungjin Kim; Mourad Tighiouart; John M David; Stephen L Shiao; Alain C Mita; Kevin S Scher; Eric J Sherman; Nancy Y Lee; Allen S Ho
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 6.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.