Mohammad Abufaraj1, Guido Dalbagni2, Siamak Daneshmand3, Simon Horenblas4, Ashish M Kamat5, Ryu Kanzaki6, Alexandre R Zlotta7, Shahrokh F Shariat8. 1. Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan. 2. Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 3. Institute of Urology, University of Southern California/ Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 4. Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 6. Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan. 7. Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Mount Sinai Hospital and University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. 8. Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: sfshariat@gmail.com.
Abstract
CONTEXT: The role of surgery in metastatic bladder cancer (BCa) is unclear. OBJECTIVE: In this collaborative review article, we reviewed the contemporary literature on the surgical management of metastatic BCa and factors associated with outcomes to support the development of clinical guidelines as well as informed clinical decision-making. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic search of English language literature using PubMed-Medline and Scopus from 1999 to 2016 was performed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The beneficial role of consolidation surgery in metastatic BCa is still unproven. In patients with clinically evident lymph node metastasis, data suggest a survival advantage for patients undergoing postchemotherapy radical cystectomy with lymphadenectomy, especially in those with measurable response to chemotherapy (CHT). Intraoperatively identified enlarged pelvic lymph nodes should be removed. Anecdotal reports of resection of pulmonary metastasis as part of multimodal approach suggest possible improved survival in well-selected patients. Cytoreductive radical cystectomy as local treatment has also been explored in patients with metastatic disease, although its benefits remain to be assessed. CONCLUSIONS: Consolidative extirpative surgery may be considered in patients with clinically evident pelvic or retroperitoneal lymph nodal metastases but only if they have had a response to CHT. Surgery for limited pulmonary metastases may also be considered in very selected cases. Best candidates are those with resectable disease who demonstrate measurable response to CHT with good performance status. In the absence of data from prospective randomized studies, each patient should be evaluated on an individual basis and decisions made together with the patient and multidisciplinary teams. PATIENT SUMMARY: Surgical resection of metastases is technically feasible and can be safely performed. It may help improve cancer control and eventually survival in very selected patients with limited metastatic burden. In a patient who is motivated to receive chemotherapy and to undergo extirpative surgical intervention, surgery should be discussed with the patient among other consolidation therapies in the setting of multidisciplinary teams.
CONTEXT: The role of surgery in metastatic bladder cancer (BCa) is unclear. OBJECTIVE: In this collaborative review article, we reviewed the contemporary literature on the surgical management of metastatic BCa and factors associated with outcomes to support the development of clinical guidelines as well as informed clinical decision-making. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic search of English language literature using PubMed-Medline and Scopus from 1999 to 2016 was performed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The beneficial role of consolidation surgery in metastatic BCa is still unproven. In patients with clinically evident lymph node metastasis, data suggest a survival advantage for patients undergoing postchemotherapy radical cystectomy with lymphadenectomy, especially in those with measurable response to chemotherapy (CHT). Intraoperatively identified enlarged pelvic lymph nodes should be removed. Anecdotal reports of resection of pulmonary metastasis as part of multimodal approach suggest possible improved survival in well-selected patients. Cytoreductive radical cystectomy as local treatment has also been explored in patients with metastatic disease, although its benefits remain to be assessed. CONCLUSIONS: Consolidative extirpative surgery may be considered in patients with clinically evident pelvic or retroperitoneal lymph nodal metastases but only if they have had a response to CHT. Surgery for limited pulmonary metastases may also be considered in very selected cases. Best candidates are those with resectable disease who demonstrate measurable response to CHT with good performance status. In the absence of data from prospective randomized studies, each patient should be evaluated on an individual basis and decisions made together with the patient and multidisciplinary teams. PATIENT SUMMARY: Surgical resection of metastases is technically feasible and can be safely performed. It may help improve cancer control and eventually survival in very selected patients with limited metastatic burden. In a patient who is motivated to receive chemotherapy and to undergo extirpative surgical intervention, surgery should be discussed with the patient among other consolidation therapies in the setting of multidisciplinary teams.
Authors: Michael Rink; Daniel J Lee; Matthew Kent; Evanguelos Xylinas; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Marko Babjuk; Antonin Brisuda; Jens Hansen; David A Green; Atiqullah Aziz; Eugene K Cha; Giacomo Novara; Felix K Chun; Yair Lotan; Patrick J Bastian; Derya Tilki; Paolo Gontero; Armin Pycha; Jack Baniel; Roy Mano; Vincenzo Ficarra; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Scott T Tagawa; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Douglas S Scherr; Daniel D Sjoberg; Shahrokh F Shariat Journal: BJU Int Date: 2012-09-03 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: P M Dodd; J A McCaffrey; H Herr; M Mazumdar; J Bacik; G Higgins; M G Boyle; H I Scher; D F Bajorin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Girish S Kulkarni; Thomas Hermanns; Yanliang Wei; Bimal Bhindi; Raj Satkunasivam; Paul Athanasopoulos; Peter J Bostrom; Cynthia Kuk; Kathy Li; Arnoud J Templeton; Srikala S Sridhar; Theodorus H van der Kwast; Peter Chung; Robert G Bristow; Michael Milosevic; Padraig Warde; Neil E Fleshner; Michael A S Jewett; Shaheena Bashir; Alexandre R Zlotta Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-04-14 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Axel Heidenreich; Stefan Wilop; Michael Pinkawa; Daniel Porres; David Pfister Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2012-09-28 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Harry W Herr; James R Faulkner; H Barton Grossman; Ronald B Natale; Ralph deVere White; Michael F Sarosdy; E David Crawford Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-06-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David Moher; Larissa Shamseer; Mike Clarke; Davina Ghersi; Alessandro Liberati; Mark Petticrew; Paul Shekelle; Lesley A Stewart Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2015-01-01
Authors: Mark Warren; Michael Kolinsky; Christina M Canil; Piotr Czaykowski; Srikala S Sridhar; Peter C Black; Christopher M Booth; Wassim Kassouf; Libni Eapen; Som D Mukherjee; Normand Blais; Bernhard J Eigl; Eric Winquist; Naveen S Basappa; Scott A North Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2019-04-26 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Marco Moschini; Evanguelos Xylinas; Stefania Zamboni; Agostino Mattei; Günter Niegisch; Evan Y Yu; Aristotelis Bamias; Neeraj Agarwal; Srikala S Sridhar; Cora N Sternberg; Ulka N Vaishampayan; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Joaquim Bellmunt; Matthew D Galsky; Francesco Montorsi; Andrea Necchi Journal: Eur Urol Oncol Date: 2019-07-13