| Literature DB >> 27267112 |
Alison Burrells1, Marieke Opsteegh2, Kevin G Pollock3, Claire L Alexander4, Jean Chatterton5, Roger Evans5, Robert Walker6, Chris-Anne McKenzie7, Dolores Hill8, Elisabeth A Innes1, Frank Katzer9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Contemporary information relating to the prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in humans is lacking for the UK population, with even less information available about the human prevalence of the parasite in Scotland. To address this, two different study groups were used to determine the prevalence and genotypes of Toxoplasma gondii in the Scottish population.Entities:
Keywords: Blood donors; Genotyping; Human brains; Longitudinal study; Serology; Seroprevalence; Seroreversion; Toxoplasma gondii
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27267112 PMCID: PMC4895884 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-016-1610-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Frequency distribution of logODc values generated from Scottish blood donors (n = 947, period 1) using the human anti-IgG T. gondii ELISA. Bars represent individual blood donors, and the curved line shows the normal distributions fitted by binomial mixture analysis. The black dashed line indicates the cut-off value (log ODc -0.48) used for subsequent analysis
Toxoplasma gondii seropositivity by collection period. Seroprevalence takes into account repeat donations from each collection period. *repeat donations taken across all collection periods where each individual is counted only once over the four-year period (2006-2009)
| Period | Collection period | No. of samples (includes repeat donations) (n) | No. of individuals (no repeat donations) (n) | No. of |
| 95 % CI (lower and upper values) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | April 2006–July 2006 | 947 | 947 | 113 | 11.9 | 9.9–14.2 |
| 2 | July 2006–August 2007 | 811 | 811 | 105 | 12.9 | 10.7–15.5 |
| 3 | April 2008–September 2008 | 766 | 697 | 84 | 12.1 | 9.7–14.7 |
| 4 | September 2008–February 2009 | 749 | 606 | 76 | 12.5 | 10.0–15.4 |
| *1–4 | April 2006–February 2009 | 3273 | 1403 | 185 | 13.2 | 11.5–15.1 |
Fig. 2T. gondii seropositivity by ELISA of Scottish blood donors in relation to age (2006–2009). Error bars indicate 95 % confidence intervals
Evidence of T. gondii IgG seroconversion or reversion and TgERP antibody response in Scottish blood donors (2006–2009)
| Donor | Positive | logODc | Collection period | Date | Status | TgERP ELISA Result (OD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | N | −0.50 | 1 | May 2006 | 0.20 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| B | N | −0.87 | 1 | May 2006 | 0.20 | |
| B | N | −0.81 | 2 | August 2006 | 0.21 | |
| B | N | −1.01 | 4 | September 2008 | 0.21 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| C | N | −0.89 | 1 | April 2006 | 0.39 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| D | N | −0.63 | 1 | May 2006 | 0.22 | |
| D | N | −0.77 | 2 | November 2006 | 0.17 | |
| D | N | −0.99 | 3 | August 2008 | 0.12 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| E | N | −0.51 | 1 | May 2006 | 0.17 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| F | N | −0.58 | 1 | June 2006 | 0.18 | |
| F | N | −0.52 | 2 | September 2006 | 0.22 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| F | N | −0.55 | 3 | July 2008 | REVERSION | 0.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| G | N | −0.80 | 1 | June 2006 | 0.15 | |
| G | N | −0.74 | 2 | October 2006 | 0.24 | |
| G | N | −0.74 | 3 | June 2008 | 0.28 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| G | N | −0.93 | 4 | February 2009 | REVERSION | 0.25 |
| H | N | −0.66 | 1 | July 2006 | 0.25 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| I | N | −0.79 | 3 | July 2008 | 0.14 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| J | N | −0.79 | 3 | August 2008 | 0.23 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cut-off values: a) logODc cut-off value for T. gondii IgG ELISA = −0.48 b) OD cut-off value for TgERP analysis = 0.41. Key: Y = positive IgG result (and also highlighted in bold), N = negative IgG result, # = positive in TgERP ELISA
Molecular detection of T. gondii DNA from human brains by year (2008–2012)
| Year | No. of samples ( |
| 95 % CI (lower and upper values) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 35 | 22.9 ( | 10.4–40.1 |
| 2009 | 37 | 5.4 ( | 0.6–18.2 |
| 2010 | 38 | 15.8 ( | 6.0–31.3 |
| 2011 | 23 | 26.1 ( | 10.2–48.4 |
| 2012 | 18 | 27.8 ( | 9.7–53.5 |
| 2008–2012 | 151 | 17.9 ( | 12.1–24.9 |
Fig. 3Detection of T. gondii DNA by ITS1 PCR in brains of humans in relation to age (2008–2012). Error bars indicate 95 % confidence intervals
T. gondii PCR-RFLP genotyping across two markers from four infected humans
| PCR-RFLP genotyping | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample ID | Gender | Age | Cause of death | SAG3 | GRA6 | Alleles identified |
| A/08 | M | 58 | Heart attack/disease | na | Ib | I |
| B/10 | M | 50 | Heart attack/disease | III | na | III |
| C/10 | M | 27 | Drug overdose | Ia | na | I |
| D/11 | M | 58 | Heart attack/disease | IIIb | na | III |
aweak band; bsequencing completed; na, no amplification
I = type I; III = type III; M = Male
Fig. 4GRA6 sequence of T. gondii detected from a human brain. Consensus sequence indicates the nucleotides shared by a minimum of two of the three archetypal clonal lineages RH (type I), Me49 (II), and CEP (III), GenBank accession numbers AF239283, AF239285 and AF239287, respectively. Sequencing shows that T. gondii type I was identified from a human brain (sample ID 19-08), using GRA6 primers
Fig. 5SAG3 sequence of T. gondii detected from a human brain. Consensus sequence indicates the nucleotides shared by a minimum of two of the three archetypal clonal lineages RH (type I), Pru (II), and CEP (III), GenBank accession numbers AF340227, AF340228 and AF340229, respectively. Sequencing shows that T. gondii type III was identified from a human brain (sample ID 13-11), using SAG3 primers