| Literature DB >> 29593335 |
Veronika Chvátalová1, Blanka Šebánková1, Hana Hrbáčková2, Petr Tureček1, Jaroslav Flegr3.
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the herpetic virus, which infects 45-100% people worldwide. Many reports suggest that CMV could impair cognitive functions of infected subjects. Here we searched for indices of effects of CMV on infected subjects' intelligence and knowledge. The Intelligence Structure Test I-S-T 2000 R was used to compare IQ of 148 CMV-infected and 135 CMV-free university students. Infected students expressed higher intelligence. Paradoxically, their IQ decreased with decreasing concentration of anti-CMV antibodies, which can be used, statistically, as a proxy of the time passed from the moment of infection in young subjects when the age of subjects is statistically controlled. The paradox of seemingly higher intelligence of CMV infected subjects could be explained by the presence of the subpopulation of about 5-10% CMV-positive individuals in the population of "CMV-negative students". These false negative subjects had probably not only the oldest infections and therefore the lowest concentration of anamnestic antibodies, but also the lowest intelligence among the infected students. Prevalence of CMV infection in all countries is very high, approaching sometimes 90%. Therefore, the total impact of CMV on human intelligence may be large.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29593335 PMCID: PMC5871756 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-23637-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Means and standard deviations of all components of intelligence in standard scores for women and men analyzed together and women and men analyzed separately.
| Total sample (N = 283) | Women (N = 197) | Men (N = 86) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Std. Dev. | Mean | Std. Dev. | Mean | Std. Dev. | |
| Verbal intelligence | 131.32 | 7.85 | 130.89 | 7.21 | 132.30 | 9.12 |
| Numerical intelligence | 110.88 | 12.23 | 109.36 | 11.40 | 114.36 | 13.37 |
| Figural intelligence | 111.21 | 13.22 | 110.95 | 13.49 | 111.80 | 12.62 |
| Verbal knowledge | 119.20 | 9.65 | 117.76 | 9.35 | 122.51 | 9.55 |
| Numerical knowledge | 120.99 | 12.05 | 119.02 | 11.30 | 125.51 | 12.56 |
| Figural knowledge | 120.34 | 10.04 | 118.69 | 10.20 | 124.13 | 8.61 |
| General knowledge | 122.73 | 9.37 | 120.84 | 8.89 | 127.05 | 9.05 |
| Crystallized intelligence | 133.12 | 9.70 | 131.25 | 9.23 | 137.40 | 9.44 |
| Fluid intelligence | 123.65 | 12.47 | 122.77 | 11.95 | 125.65 | 13.45 |
| General intelligence | 120.16 | 10.00 | 119.20 | 9.59 | 122.35 | 10.62 |
Correlations between IQs and age.
| Total sample (N = 283) | Women (N = 197) | Men (N = 86) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| p | η² | B | p | η² | B | p | η² | B | |
| Verbal intelligence | 0.453 | 0.002 | 0.104 | 0.837 | 0.000 | 0.032 | 0.370 | 0.010 | 0.254 |
| Numerical intelligence | 0.241 | 0.005 | −0.341 |
| 0.025 | −0.739 | 0.385 | 0.009 | 0.495 |
| Figural intelligence | 0.100 | 0.010 | −0.383 |
| 0.023 | −0.617 | 0.783 | 0.001 | 0.109 |
| Verbal knowledge | 0.092 | 0.010 | 0.147 | 0.396 | 0.004 | 0.090 | 0.086 | 0.035 | 0.267 |
| Numerical knowledge | 0.428 | 0.002 | −0.078 |
| 0.038 | −0.316 | 0.022 | 0.061 | 0.422 |
| Figural knowledge | 0.729 | 0.000 | −0.030 | 0.501 | 0.002 | −0.074 | 0.646 | 0.003 | 0.063 |
| General knowledge | 0.854 | 0.000 | 0.039 | 0.240 | 0.007 | −0.301 | 0.044 | 0.047 | 0.752 |
| Crystallized intelligence | 0.658 | 0.001 | 0.678 | 0.460 | 0.003 | −1.365 | 0.068 | 0.039 | 4.963 |
| Fluid intelligence | 0.094 | 0.010 | −3.097 |
| 0.036 | −5.711 | 0.499 | 0.005 | 2.387 |
| General intelligence | 0.212 | 0.006 | −0.620 |
| 0.026 | −1.324 | 0.362 | 0.010 | 0.858 |
Values of p, η², B (the slope of a correlation line, positive for the positive relations between the cognitive performance and age) refer to age as computed with GLM. The resuls significant after the correction for multiple tests are printed in bold.
Intelligence of CMV infected and CMV-free subjects.
| Total sample (N = 283) | Women (N = 197) | Men (N = 86) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMV-free | CMV-infected | CMV-free | CMV-infected | CMV-free | CMV-infected | |
| Verbal intelligence | 130 (8.4) | 132 (7.2) | 130 (7.0) | 131 (7.4) | 132 (11.6) | 134 (6.6) |
| Numerical intelligence | 110 (12.0) | 112 (12.4) | 108 (11.0) | 114 (11.8) | 110 (13.6) | 115 (13.3) |
| Figural intelligence | 111 (12.7) | 111 (13.7) | 111 (12.6) | 113 (14.4) | 111 (13.1) | 111 (12.4) |
| Verbal knowledge | 117 (9.2) | 121 (12.1) | 116 (9.0) | 119 (9.4) | 120 (9.6) | 125 (8.9) |
| Numerical knowledge | 121 (12.0) | 121 (12.1) | 119 (11.1) | 124 (11.6) | 119 (13.9) | 127 (11.5) |
| Figural knowledge | 121 (10.1) | 120 (10.1) | 119 (10.0) | 124 (10.6) | 118 (9.7) | 124 (7.8) |
| General knowledge | 122 (9.2) | 124 (9.4) | 120 (8.6) | 125 (9.2) | 121 (10.1) | 128 (8.1) |
| Crystallized intelligence | 132 (9.6) | 134 (9.7) | 131 (9.2) | 135 (9.3) | 132 (10.2) | 139 (8.7) |
| Fluid intelligence | 123 (12.3) | 124 (12.6) | 122 (11.6) | 126 (12.3) | 124 (13.8) | 126 (13.3) |
| General intelligence | 119 (9.7) | 121 (10.2) | 118 (9.1) | 122 (10.1) | 120 (11.0) | 123 (10.4) |
The table shows means and standard deviations (in parentheses).
Figure 1Correlation between antibody titre and verbal intelligence in CMV-positive subjects. The abscissa shows verbal intelligence of women and men in standard scores and the ordinate shows the level of specific antibodies in arbitray units deffined by the manufacturer of the ELISA kit.
Figure 2Correlation between antibody titre and fluid intelligence in CMV-positive subjects. The abscissa shows fluid intelligence of women and men in standard scores and the ordinate shows the level of specific antibodies in arbitray units deffined by the manufacturer of the ELISA kit.
Figure 3The model explaining the paradox of seemingly higher intelligence in CMV infected subjects and positive correlation between the concentration of anti-CMV antibodies and IQ. The concentration of anti-CMV antibodies fluctuates in time and differs between subjects depending on many genetic and environmental factors, however, statistically, the level of these antibodies decreases with time from the infection in young people (see the lowest graph). In parallel, the intelligence of infected subjects decreases with time due to unknown cumulative effects of the chronical infection. Due to these two processes, the infected subjects with the lowest intelligence have also the lowest level of antibodies and many of them therefore score negatively in ELISA test (upper part of the figure). Therefore, the mean intelligence of CMV-seropositive subjects is higher than that of CMV-seronegative subjects (who represent the mixture on CMV-free and CMV-very-long-infected subjects).
Differences between CMV-positive and CMV-negative subjects (women and men together) tested by permutation tail probability test with data reassignment.
| 0% | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verbal intelligence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Numerical intelligence | 0.111 |
| 0.126 | 0.146 | 0.239 | 0.261 |
| Figural intelligence | 0.430 | 0.491 | 0.544 | 0.570 | 0.570 | 0.567 |
| Verbal knowledge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Numerical knowledge | 0.345 | 0.360 | 0.335 | 0.375 | 0.342 | 0.346 |
| Figural knowledge | 0.611 | 0.582 | 0.554 | 0.559 | 0.596 | 0.599 |
| General knowledge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Crystallized intelligence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Fluid intelligence | 0.195 | 0.228 | 0.242 | 0.265 | 0.285 | 0.289 |
| General intelligence | 0.734 |
| 0.128 | 0.153 | 0.174 | 0.182 |
The column headings show the fraction of reassigned cases and the rest of the table shows the statistical significance (p) of two-sided permutation tests. The p in the second column (without reassignment) correspond to H0 hypothesis „Infected subjects have lower or equal intelligence than CMV-free subjects.“ while the p values in other columns correspond to H0 hypothesis: “Infected subjects have higher or equal intelligence than CMV-free subjects.“ This means that the significant results presented in the second column indicated higher cognitive performance of CMV seropositive subjects (when the effect of false negatives was not controlled), while the significant results presented in other columns indicated higher cognitive performance of CMV seronegative subjects (when the effect of false negatives was properly controlled). Results significant after the correction for multiple tests are printed in bold. The algorithm of the permutation test with data reassignment is described in the Methods section.
Differences between CMV-positive and CMV-negative women tested by permutation tail probability test with data reassignment.
| 0% | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verbal intelligence | 0.917 | 0.082 | 0.089 | 0.112 | 0.296 | 0.339 |
| Numerical intelligence | 0.868 | 0.124 | 0.156 | 0.173 | 0.192 | 0.202 |
| Figural intelligence | 0.622 | 0.367 | 0.437 | 0.474 | 0.489 | 0.520 |
| Verbal knowledge | 0.998 |
| 0.054 | 0.041 | 0.046 | 0.046 |
| Numerical knowledge | 0.126 | 0.691 | 0.669 | 0.646 | 0.659 | 0.633 |
| Figural knowledge | 0.146 | 0.708 | 0.738 | 0.845 | 0.845 | 0.847 |
| General knowledge | 0.739 | 0.215 | 0.215 | 0.235 | 0.274 | 0.358 |
| Crystallized intelligence | 0.767 | 0.091 | 0.116 | 0.128 | 0.151 | 0.206 |
| Fluid intelligence | 0.802 | 0.228 | 0.238 | 0.261 | 0.261 | 0.254 |
| General intelligence | 0.911 | 0.128 | 0.154 | 0.167 | 0.178 | 0.193 |
For the legend see the Table 4.
Differences between CMV-positive and CMV-negative men tested by permutation tail probability test with data reassignment.
| 0% | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verbal intelligence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Numerical intelligence | 0.444 | 0.446 | 0.452 | 0.453 | 0.465 | 0.489 |
| Figural intelligence | 0.676 | 0.691 | 0.704 | 0.701 | 0.698 | 0.674 |
| Verbal knowledge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Numerical knowledge | 0.178 | 0.174 | 0.167 | 0.154 | 0.174 | 0.171 |
| Figural knowledge | 0.606 | 0.602 | 0.550 | 0.452 | 0.404 | 0.232 |
| General knowledge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Crystallized intelligence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Fluid intelligence | 0.477 | 0.473 | 0.485 | 0.491 | 0.488 | 0.506 |
| General intelligence | 0.369 | 0.364 | 0.362 | 0.378 | 0.402 | 0.433 |
For the legend see the Table 4.
Effect of relocation of false negative subjects on the results of a permutation test if no such subjects exist in the population.
| Standard deviation | Fraction of relocated subjects | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 25% | 30% | 50% | |
| 6 | 0.0012 | 0.0013 | 0.0014 | 0.0016 | 0.0018 | 0.0021 | 0.0025 | 0.0055 |
| 9 | 0.0202 | 0.0211 | 0.0222 | 0.0236 | 0.0252 | 0.0272 | 0.0292 | 0.0426 |
| 12 | 0.0646 | 0.0662 | 0.0678 | 0.0697 | 0.0724 | 0.0755 | 0.0786 | 0.0974 |
| 15 | 0.1101 | 0.1123 | 0.1149 | 0.1177 | 0.1211 | 0.1249 | 0.1285 | 0.1489 |
| 30 | 0.2689 | 0.2707 | 0.2726 | 0.2748 | 0.2775 | 0.2804 | 0.2833 | 0.2997 |
The table shows p values computed with the permutation test for contaminated data when the population under study contains no false negative subjects. The simulation experiments were performed on populations that differ by variances (rows) with relocation of different fractions of IQ-lowest individuals (columns) from the high-IQ group to the low-IQ group. The first column (0%) shows (the most significant) results of permutation tests performed without any relocation of data.