Literature DB >> 15483524

Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: evaluation of benefits and risks and recommendations for state newborn screening programs.

Scott D Grosse1, Coleen A Boyle, Jeffrey R Botkin, Anne Marie Comeau, Martin Kharrazi, Margaret Rosenfeld, Benjamin S Wilfond.   

Abstract

In November 2003, CDC and the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation cosponsored a workshop to review the benefits and risks associated with newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (CF). This report describes new research findings and outlines the recommendations of the workshop. The peer-reviewed evidence presented at the workshop supports the clinical utility of newborn screening for CF. Demonstrated long-term benefits from early nutritional treatment as a result of newborn screening for CF include improved growth and, in one study, cognitive development. Other benefits might include reduced hospitalizations and improved survival. Mixed evidence has been reported for pulmonary outcomes. Newborn screening in the United States is associated with diagnosis of CF a median of 1 year earlier than symptomatic detection, which might reduce the expense and anxiety associated with workup for failure to thrive or other symptoms. Certain psychosocial risks for carrier children and their families (e.g., anxiety and misunderstanding) are associated with newborn screening. Exposure of young children to infectious agents through person-to-person transmission in clinical settings, although not an inherent risk of newborn screening, is a potential cause of harm from early detection. Involving specialists in CF care and infection control, genetic counseling, and communication can minimize these potential harms. Although screening decisions depend on a state's individual resources and priorities, on the basis of evidence of moderate benefits and low risk of harm, CDC believes that newborn screening for CF is justified. States should consider the magnitude of benefits and costs and the need to minimize risks through careful planning and implementation, including ongoing collection and evaluation of outcome data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15483524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep        ISSN: 1057-5987


  67 in total

1.  Characterization of primary rat nasal epithelial cultures in CFTR knockout rats as a model for CF sinus disease.

Authors:  Kiranya E Tipirneni; Do-Yeon Cho; Daniel F Skinner; Shaoyan Zhang; Calvin Mackey; Dong-Jin Lim; Bradford A Woodworth
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Implementation of the first worldwide quality assurance program for cystic fibrosis multiple mutation detection in population-based screening.

Authors:  Marie C Earley; Anita Laxova; Philip M Farrell; Rena Driscoll-Dunn; Suzanne Cordovado; Peter J Mogayzel; Michael W Konstan; W Harry Hannon
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.786

3.  Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing: what are we talking about?

Authors:  Meredith Weaver; Toni I Pollin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  CFTR mutation analysis and haplotype associations in CF patients.

Authors:  S K Cordovado; M Hendrix; C N Greene; S Mochal; M C Earley; P M Farrell; M Kharrazi; W H Hannon; P W Mueller
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 4.797

5.  A decision-tree approach to cost comparison of newborn screening strategies for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Janelle Wells; Marjorie Rosenberg; Gary Hoffman; Michael Anstead; Philip M Farrell
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Assessing the risks and benefits of diagnosing genetic conditions with variable phenotypes through population screening: Klinefelter syndrome as an example.

Authors:  Amy Simone Herlihy; Jane Halliday; Rob I McLachlan; Megan Cock; Lynn Gillam
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2010-03-29

7.  A comparative study of five technologically diverse CFTR testing platforms.

Authors:  Monique A Johnson; Marvin J Yoshitomi; C Sue Richards
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 8.  A systematic review of the effects of disclosing carrier results generated through newborn screening.

Authors:  R Z Hayeems; J P Bytautas; F A Miller
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 9.  Challenging the Current Recommendations for Carrier Testing in Children.

Authors:  Grace E VanNoy; Casie A Genetti; Amy L McGuire; Robert C Green; Alan H Beggs; Ingrid A Holm
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Who counsels parents of newborns who are carriers of sickle cell anemia or cystic fibrosis?

Authors:  Kathryn L Moseley; Samya Z Nasr; Jane L Schuette; Andrew D Campbell
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.