Literature DB >> 32309642

Correlation of neural foraminal motion after surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy with long-term patient reported outcomes.

Yener N Yeni1, Timothy Baumer1, Daniel Oravec1, Azam Basheer2, Michael J Bey1, Stephen W Bartol1, Victor Chang2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Post-surgical changes in adjacent segment motion are considered a factor in further development of degeneration and cervical radiculopathy. The objective was to examine the extent of correlations between physiological motion of cervical foramina and long-term patient reported outcomes (PRO).
METHODS: Biplane X-ray imaging and CT-based markerless tracking were used to measure 3D static and dynamic dimensions during neck axial rotation and extension from 18 patients treated for C5-6 radiculopathy with fusion or arthroplasty. Minimum foraminal height (FH.Min) and width (FW.Min), and their range (FH.Range and FW.Range) achieved during a motion task were calculated for adjacent levels (C4-5 and C6-7) at 2.0±0.6 years post-surgery. The modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score (mJOAS), the Neck Disability Index (NDI) including the visual analogue scale (VAS) for neck and arm pain, and the EuroQol EQ-5D score were recorded at 6.5±1.1 years post-surgery. The relationships between 6.5-year outcomes and 2-year foraminal motion were examined using regression.
RESULTS: Worsening patient-reported outcomes were generally associated with lower values of FW.Min (P<0.05 to P<0.008), the associations being stronger for neck extension (r2 up to 0.43). Dynamic foraminal measurements from the C6-7 level more significantly and consistently correlated with mJOAS, EQ-5D and NDI Arm Pain VAS (r2=0.27 to 0.43; P<0.03 to P<0.008), whereas those from the C4-5 level correlated with NDI Neck Pain VAS (r2=0.33; P<0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic 3D foraminal dimensions at 2-year post-surgery, notably FW.Min measured in neck extension at adjacent levels, were associated with PRO at 6.5 years post-surgery. These relationships provide insight into the motion related factors in development of pain and loss of function, and may help develop markers or objective outcome measures. 2020 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical spondylosis; patient reported outcomes (PRO); range of motion; spinal fusion; total disc replacement

Year:  2020        PMID: 32309642      PMCID: PMC7154365          DOI: 10.21037/jss.2020.03.02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2414-4630


  29 in total

1.  Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rick C Sasso; Paul A Anderson; K Daniel Riew; John G Heller
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Cervical radiculopathy: pathophysiology, presentation, and clinical evaluation.

Authors:  Khalid M Abbed; Jean-Valéry C E Coumans
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Ultrasonographic reference sizes of the median and ulnar nerves and the cervical nerve roots in healthy Japanese adults.

Authors:  Takamichi Sugimoto; Kazuhide Ochi; Naohisa Hosomi; Tomoya Mukai; Hiroki Ueno; Tetsuya Takahashi; Toshiho Ohtsuki; Tatsuo Kohriyama; Masayasu Matsumoto
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Automated measurement of neural foramen cross-sectional area during in vivo functional movement.

Authors:  William J Anderst
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 1.763

5.  A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of the Adjacent Segment Parameters in Cervical Disk Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Authors:  Liang Dong; Dongqi Wang; Xiujin Chen; Tuanjing Liu; Zhengwei Xu; Mingsheng Tan; Dingjun Hao
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.876

6.  Are patient-reported outcomes predictive of patient satisfaction 5 years after anterior cervical spine surgery?

Authors:  Gregory D Schroeder; Dom Coric; Han Jo Kim; Todd J Albert; Kris E Radcliff
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  The location of the spinal nerve root on plain radiographs of the cervical spine.

Authors:  N A Ebraheim; D Reader; R Xu; R A Yeasting
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.390

8.  The natural history of the cervical foramen in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals aged 20-60 years as measured by magnetic resonance imaging. A descriptive approach.

Authors:  S C Humphreys; S D Hodges; A Patwardhan; J C Eck; L A Covington; M Sartori
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Overview of disc arthroplasty-past, present and future.

Authors:  Tamás Fülöp Fekete; François Porchet
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity.

Authors:  H Vernon; S Mior
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.