Literature DB >> 27258368

Moving Beyond Active-Site Detection: MixMD Applied to Allosteric Systems.

Phani Ghanakota1, Heather A Carlson1.   

Abstract

Mixed-solvent molecular dynamics (MixMD) is a hotspot-mapping technique that relies on molecular dynamics simulations of proteins in binary solvent mixtures. Previous work on MixMD has established the technique's effectiveness in capturing binding sites of small organic compounds. In this work, we show that MixMD can identify both competitive and allosteric sites on proteins. The MixMD approach embraces full protein flexibility and allows competition between solvent probes and water. Sites preferentially mapped by probe molecules are more likely to be binding hotspots. There are two important requirements for the identification of ligand-binding hotspots: (1) hotspots must be mapped at very high signal-to-noise ratio and (2) the hotspots must be mapped by multiple probe types. We have developed our mapping protocol around acetonitrile, isopropanol, and pyrimidine as probe solvents because they allowed us to capture hydrophilic, hydrophobic, hydrogen-bonding, and aromatic interactions. Charged probes were needed for mapping one target, and we introduce them in this work. In order to demonstrate the robust nature and wide applicability of the technique, a combined total of 5 μs of MixMD was applied across several protein targets known to exhibit allosteric modulation. Most notably, all the protein crystal structures used to initiate our simulations had no allosteric ligands bound, so there was no preorganization of the sites to predispose the simulations to find the allosteric hotspots. The protein test cases were ABL Kinase, Androgen Receptor, CHK1 Kinase, Glucokinase, PDK1 Kinase, Farnesyl Pyrophosphate Synthase, and Protein-Tyrosine Phosphatase 1B. The success of the technique is demonstrated by the fact that the top-four sites solely map the competitive and allosteric sites. Lower-ranked sites consistently map other biologically relevant sites, multimerization interfaces, or crystal-packing interfaces. Lastly, we highlight the importance of including protein flexibility by demonstrating that MixMD can map allosteric sites that are not detected in half the systems using FTMap applied to the same crystal structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27258368      PMCID: PMC5214548          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b03515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  39 in total

1.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters.

Authors:  Viktor Hornak; Robert Abel; Asim Okur; Bentley Strockbine; Adrian Roitberg; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-11-15

Review 2.  Locating and characterizing binding sites on proteins.

Authors:  C Mattos; D Ringe
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Structural conservation of druggable hot spots in protein-protein interfaces.

Authors:  Dima Kozakov; David R Hall; Gwo-Yu Chuang; Regina Cencic; Ryan Brenke; Laurie E Grove; Dmitri Beglov; Jerry Pelletier; Adrian Whitty; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  T and R states in the crystals of bacterial L-lactate dehydrogenase reveal the mechanism for allosteric control.

Authors:  S Iwata; K Kamata; S Yoshida; T Minowa; T Ohta
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1994-03

5.  Allosteric inhibition of PTP1B activity by selective modification of a non-active site cysteine residue.

Authors:  Stig K Hansen; Mark T Cancilla; Timothy P Shiau; Jenny Kung; Teresa Chen; Daniel A Erlanson
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Hot spots for allosteric regulation on protein surfaces.

Authors:  Kimberly A Reynolds; Richard N McLaughlin; Rama Ranganathan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Identifying binding hot spots on protein surfaces by mixed-solvent molecular dynamics: HIV-1 protease as a test case.

Authors:  Peter M U Ung; Phani Ghanakota; Sarah E Graham; Katrina W Lexa; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.505

8.  Computational fragment-based binding site identification by ligand competitive saturation.

Authors:  Olgun Guvench; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Selective activation of the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor achieved by allosteric potentiation.

Authors:  Lei Ma; Matthew A Seager; Matthew Seager; Marion Wittmann; Marlene Jacobson; Denise Bickel; Maryann Burno; Keith Jones; Valerie Kuzmick Graufelds; Guangping Xu; Michelle Pearson; Alexander McCampbell; Renee Gaspar; Paul Shughrue; Andrew Danziger; Christopher Regan; Rose Flick; Danette Pascarella; Susan Garson; Scott Doran; Constantine Kreatsoulas; Lone Veng; Craig W Lindsley; William Shipe; Scott Kuduk; Cyrille Sur; Gene Kinney; Guy R Seabrook; William J Ray
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Parameter choice matters: validating probe parameters for use in mixed-solvent simulations.

Authors:  Katrina W Lexa; Garrett B Goh; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.956

View more
  32 in total

1.  Extending the Detection Limit in Fragment Screening of Proteins Using Reverse Micelle Encapsulation.

Authors:  Brian Fuglestad; Nicole E Kerstetter; Sabrina Bédard; A Joshua Wand
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 5.100

Review 2.  Driving Structure-Based Drug Discovery through Cosolvent Molecular Dynamics.

Authors:  Phani Ghanakota; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 3.  Advanced Methods for Accessing Protein Shape-Shifting Present New Therapeutic Opportunities.

Authors:  Catherine R Knoverek; Gaya K Amarasinghe; Gregory R Bowman
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 13.807

4.  Identification of Small-Molecule Positive Modulators of Calcitonin-like Receptor-Based Receptors.

Authors:  Erica R Hendrikse; Lydia P Liew; Rebekah L Bower; Muriel Bonnet; Muhammad A Jamaluddin; Nicole Prodan; Keith D Richards; Christopher S Walker; Garry Pairaudeau; David M Smith; Roxana-Maria Rujan; Risha Sudra; Christopher A Reynolds; Jason M Booe; Augen A Pioszak; Jack U Flanagan; Michael P Hay; Debbie L Hay
Journal:  ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci       Date:  2020-03-12

Review 5.  Investigating Cryptic Binding Sites by Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Antonija Kuzmanic; Gregory R Bowman; Jordi Juarez-Jimenez; Julien Michel; Francesco L Gervasio
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 22.384

6.  Predicting Displaceable Water Sites Using Mixed-Solvent Molecular Dynamics.

Authors:  Sarah E Graham; Richard D Smith; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Identification and characterization of fragment binding sites for allosteric ligand design using the site identification by ligand competitive saturation hotspots approach (SILCS-Hotspots).

Authors:  Alexander D MacKerell; Sunhwan Jo; Sirish Kaushik Lakkaraju; Christoffer Lind; Wenbo Yu
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 3.770

8.  Modulating Enzyme Activity by Altering Protein Dynamics with Solvent.

Authors:  Michael R Duff; Jose M Borreguero; Matthew J Cuneo; Arvind Ramanathan; Junhong He; Ganesh Kamath; S Chakra Chennubhotla; Flora Meilleur; Elizabeth E Howell; Kenneth W Herwig; Dean A A Myles; Pratul K Agarwal
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 9.  Inhibitors of protein-protein interactions (PPIs): an analysis of scaffold choices and buried surface area.

Authors:  Xu Ran; Jason E Gestwicki
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  MixMD Probeview: Robust Binding Site Prediction from Cosolvent Simulations.

Authors:  Sarah E Graham; Noah Leja; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 4.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.