Literature DB >> 27255698

Most stomatal closure in woody species under moderate drought can be explained by stomatal responses to leaf turgor.

Celia M Rodriguez-Dominguez1,2, Thomas N Buckley3, Gregorio Egea4, Alfonso de Cires2, Virginia Hernandez-Santana1, Sebastia Martorell5, Antonio Diaz-Espejo1.   

Abstract

Reduced stomatal conductance (gs ) during soil drought in angiosperms may result from effects of leaf turgor on stomata and/or factors that do not directly depend on leaf turgor, including root-derived abscisic acid (ABA) signals. To quantify the roles of leaf turgor-mediated and leaf turgor-independent mechanisms in gs decline during drought, we measured drought responses of gs and water relations in three woody species (almond, grapevine and olive) under a range of conditions designed to generate independent variation in leaf and root turgor, including diurnal variation in evaporative demand and changes in plant hydraulic conductance and leaf osmotic pressure. We then applied these data to a process-based gs model and used a novel method to partition observed declines in gs during drought into contributions from each parameter in the model. Soil drought reduced gs by 63-84% across species, and the model reproduced these changes well (r(2)  = 0.91, P < 0.0001, n = 44) despite having only a single fitted parameter. Our analysis concluded that responses mediated by leaf turgor could explain over 87% of the observed decline in gs across species, adding to a growing body of evidence that challenges the root ABA-centric model of stomatal responses to drought.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abscisic acid; isohydric; process-based model; stomata; stomatal limitation; transpiration; water stress

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27255698     DOI: 10.1111/pce.12774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell Environ        ISSN: 0140-7791            Impact factor:   7.228


  17 in total

Review 1.  Stomatal Biology of CAM Plants.

Authors:  Jamie Males; Howard Griffiths
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 2.  Modeling Stomatal Conductance.

Authors:  Thomas N Buckley
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  A Dynamic Hydro-Mechanical and Biochemical Model of Stomatal Conductance for C4 Photosynthesis.

Authors:  Chandra Bellasio; Joe Quirk; Thomas N Buckley; David J Beerling
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  ABA Accumulation in Dehydrating Leaves Is Associated with Decline in Cell Volume, Not Turgor Pressure.

Authors:  Lawren Sack; Grace P John; Thomas N Buckley
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  A 3-D functional-structural grapevine model that couples the dynamics of water transport with leaf gas exchange.

Authors:  Junqi Zhu; Zhanwu Dai; Philippe Vivin; Gregory A Gambetta; Michael Henke; Anthony Peccoux; Nathalie Ollat; Serge Delrot
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Optimal stomatal behavior with competition for water and risk of hydraulic impairment.

Authors:  Adam Wolf; William R L Anderegg; Stephen W Pacala
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A Small Gtp-Binding Protein GhROP3 Interacts with GhGGB Protein and Negatively Regulates Drought Tolerance in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.).

Authors:  Ziyao Hu; Jianfeng Lei; Peihong Dai; Chao Liu; Abuduweili Wugalihan; Xiaodong Liu; Yue Li
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-15

8.  Root pressure-volume curve traits capture rootstock drought tolerance.

Authors:  M K Bartlett; G Sinclair; G Fontanesi; T Knipfer; M A Walker; A J McElrone
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 5.040

9.  Stomatal VPD Response: There Is More to the Story Than ABA.

Authors:  Ebe Merilo; Dmitry Yarmolinsky; Pirko Jalakas; Helen Parik; Ingmar Tulva; Bakhtier Rasulov; Kalle Kilk; Hannes Kollist
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  The Causes of Leaf Hydraulic Vulnerability and Its Influence on Gas Exchange in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Christine Scoffoni; Caetano Albuquerque; Hervé Cochard; Thomas N Buckley; Leila R Fletcher; Marissa A Caringella; Megan Bartlett; Craig R Brodersen; Steven Jansen; Andrew J McElrone; Lawren Sack
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 8.340

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.