Literature DB >> 34668965

Root pressure-volume curve traits capture rootstock drought tolerance.

M K Bartlett1, G Sinclair1, G Fontanesi1, T Knipfer1,2, M A Walker1, A J McElrone1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Living root tissues significantly constrain plant water uptake under drought, but we lack functional traits to feasibly screen diverse plants for variation in the drought responses of these tissues. Water stress causes roots to lose volume and turgor, which are crucial to root structure, hydraulics and growth. Thus, we hypothesized that root pressure-volume (p-v) curve traits, which quantify the effects of water potential on bulk root turgor and volume, would capture differences in rootstock drought tolerance.
METHODS: We used a greenhouse experiment to evaluate relationships between root p-v curve traits and gas exchange, whole-plant hydraulic conductance and biomass under drought for eight grapevine rootstocks that varied widely in drought performance in field trials (101-14, 110R, 420A, 5C, 140-Ru, 1103P, Ramsey and Riparia Gloire), grafted to the same scion variety (Vitis vinifera 'Chardonnay'). KEY
RESULTS: The traits varied significantly across rootstocks, and droughted vines significantly reduced root turgor loss point (πtlp), osmotic potential at full hydration (πo) and capacitance (C), indicating that roots became less susceptible to turgor loss and volumetric shrinkage. Rootstocks that retained a greater root volume (i.e. a lower C) also maintained more gas exchange under drought. The rootstocks that previous field trials have classified as drought tolerant exhibited significantly lower πtlp, πo and C values in well-watered conditions, but significantly higher πo and πtlp values under water stress, than the varieties classified as drought sensitive.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that acclimation in root p-v curve traits improves gas exchange in persistently dry conditions, potentially through impacts on root hydraulics or root to shoot chemical signalling. However, retaining turgor and volume in previously unstressed roots, as these roots deplete wet soil to moderately negative water potentials, could be more important to drought performance in the deep, highly heterogenous rooting zones which grapevines develop under field conditions.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990 Vitiszzm321990 ; Root hydraulics; capacitance; grapevine; pressure–volume; root drought tolerance; rootstock; turgor loss point

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34668965      PMCID: PMC8944712          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcab132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   5.040


  33 in total

1.  The correlations and sequence of plant stomatal, hydraulic, and wilting responses to drought.

Authors:  Megan K Bartlett; Tamir Klein; Steven Jansen; Brendan Choat; Lawren Sack
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Cell wall components regulate photosynthesis and leaf water relations of Vitis vinifera cv. Grenache acclimated to contrasting environmental conditions.

Authors:  Margalida Roig-Oliver; Miquel Nadal; María José Clemente-Moreno; Josefina Bota; Jaume Flexas
Journal:  J Plant Physiol       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 3.549

3.  Declining root water transport drives stomatal closure in olive under moderate water stress.

Authors:  Celia M Rodriguez-Dominguez; Timothy J Brodribb
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 10.151

4.  Transient Responses of Cell Turgor and Growth of Maize Roots as Affected by Changes in Water Potential.

Authors:  J. Frensch; T. C. Hsiao
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Water uptake along the length of grapevine fine roots: developmental anatomy, tissue-specific aquaporin expression, and pathways of water transport.

Authors:  Gregory A Gambetta; Jiong Fei; Thomas L Rost; Thorsten Knipfer; Mark A Matthews; Ken A Shackel; M Andrew Walker; Andrew J McElrone
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Water stress and cell wall polysaccharides in the apical root zone of wheat cultivars varying in drought tolerance.

Authors:  Maria Rosaria Leucci; Marcello Salvatore Lenucci; Gabriella Piro; Giuseppe Dalessandro
Journal:  J Plant Physiol       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 3.549

7.  Root foraging in response to heterogeneous soil moisture in two grapevines that differ in potential growth rate.

Authors:  Taryn L Bauerle; David R Smart; William L Bauerle; Christine Stockert; David M Eissenstat
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 10.151

8.  Most stomatal closure in woody species under moderate drought can be explained by stomatal responses to leaf turgor.

Authors:  Celia M Rodriguez-Dominguez; Thomas N Buckley; Gregorio Egea; Alfonso de Cires; Virginia Hernandez-Santana; Sebastia Martorell; Antonio Diaz-Espejo
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 7.228

9.  Root ABA Accumulation in Long-Term Water-Stressed Plants is Sustained by Hormone Transport from Aerial Organs.

Authors:  Matías Manzi; Joanna Lado; María Jesús Rodrigo; Lorenzo Zacarías; Vicent Arbona; Aurelio Gómez-Cadenas
Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 4.927

10.  Stomatal closure is induced by hydraulic signals and maintained by ABA in drought-stressed grapevine.

Authors:  Sergio Tombesi; Andrea Nardini; Tommaso Frioni; Marta Soccolini; Claudia Zadra; Daniela Farinelli; Stefano Poni; Alberto Palliotti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  4 in total

1.  A time-honoured technique goes underground to investigate root drought tolerance. A commentary on: 'Root pressure-volume curve traits capture rootstock drought tolerance'.

Authors:  Gretchen B North
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Coordination of hydraulic thresholds across roots, stems, and leaves of two co-occurring mangrove species.

Authors:  Guo-Feng Jiang 蒋国凤; Su-Yuan Li 李溯源; Yi-Chan Li 李艺蝉; Adam B Roddy
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 8.005

3.  Expression of Potato StDRO1 in Arabidopsis Alters Root Architecture and Drought Tolerance.

Authors:  Chao Sun; Wenjun Liang; Kan Yan; Derong Xu; Tianyuan Qin; Sajid Fiaz; Philip Kear; Zhenzhen Bi; Yuhui Liu; Zhen Liu; Junlian Zhang; Jiangping Bai
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 4.  Strategies of tree species to adapt to drought from leaf stomatal regulation and stem embolism resistance to root properties.

Authors:  Zhicheng Chen; Shan Li; Xianchong Wan; Shirong Liu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 6.627

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.