Literature DB >> 29293870

A 3-D functional-structural grapevine model that couples the dynamics of water transport with leaf gas exchange.

Junqi Zhu1, Zhanwu Dai1, Philippe Vivin1, Gregory A Gambetta1, Michael Henke2, Anthony Peccoux1, Nathalie Ollat1, Serge Delrot1.   

Abstract

Background and Aims: Predicting both plant water status and leaf gas exchange under various environmental conditions is essential for anticipating the effects of climate change on plant growth and productivity. This study developed a functional-structural grapevine model which combines a mechanistic understanding of stomatal function and photosynthesis at the leaf level (i.e. extended Farqhuhar-von Caemmerer-Berry model) and the dynamics of water transport from soil to individual leaves (i.e. Tardieu-Davies model).
Methods: The model included novel features that account for the effects of xylem embolism (fPLC) on leaf hydraulic conductance and residual stomatal conductance (g0), variable root and leaf hydraulic conductance, and the microclimate of individual organs. The model was calibrated with detailed datasets of leaf photosynthesis, leaf water potential, xylem sap abscisic acid (ABA) concentration and hourly whole-plant transpiration observed within a soil drying period, and validated with independent datasets of whole-plant transpiration under both well-watered and water-stressed conditions. Key
Results: The model well captured the effects of radiation, temperature, CO2 and vapour pressure deficit on leaf photosynthesis, transpiration, stomatal conductance and leaf water potential, and correctly reproduced the diurnal pattern and decline of water flux within the soil drying period. In silico analyses revealed that decreases in g0 with increasing fPLC were essential to avoid unrealistic drops in leaf water potential under severe water stress. Additionally, by varying the hydraulic conductance along the pathway (e.g. root and leaves) and changing the sensitivity of stomatal conductance to ABA and leaf water potential, the model can produce different water use behaviours (i.e. iso- and anisohydric). Conclusions: The robust performance of this model allows for modelling climate effects from individual plants to fields, and for modelling plants with complex, non-homogenous canopies. In addition, the model provides a basis for future modelling efforts aimed at describing the physiology and growth of individual organs in relation to water status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29293870      PMCID: PMC5906973          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcx141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  58 in total

1.  Grapevine petioles are more sensitive to drought induced embolism than stems: evidence from in vivo MRI and microcomputed tomography observations of hydraulic vulnerability segmentation.

Authors:  Uri Hochberg; Caetano Albuquerque; Shimon Rachmilevitch; Herve Cochard; Rakefet David-Schwartz; Craig R Brodersen; Andrew McElrone; Carel W Windt
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 7.228

Review 2.  The control of stomata by water balance.

Authors:  Thomas N Buckley
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 10.151

3.  Nighttime transpiration in woody plants from contrasting ecosystems.

Authors:  Todd E Dawson; Stephen S O Burgess; Kevin P Tu; Rafael S Oliveira; Louis S Santiago; Joshua B Fisher; Kevin A Simonin; Anthony R Ambrose
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.196

4.  Higher rates of leaf gas exchange are associated with higher leaf hydrodynamic pressure gradients.

Authors:  Peter J Franks
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.228

Review 5.  Modeling Stomatal Conductance.

Authors:  Thomas N Buckley
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Stomatal closure with soil water depletion not associated with changes in Bulk leaf water status.

Authors:  L M Bates; A E Hall
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Reduced nighttime transpiration is a relevant breeding target for high water-use efficiency in grapevine.

Authors:  Aude Coupel-Ledru; Eric Lebon; Angélique Christophe; Agustina Gallo; Pilar Gago; Florent Pantin; Agnès Doligez; Thierry Simonneau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Atmospheric and soil drought reduce nocturnal conductance in live oaks.

Authors:  Jeannine Cavender-Bares; Lawren Sack; Jessica Savage
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.196

9.  Stomatal responses to vapour pressure deficit are regulated by high speed gene expression in angiosperms.

Authors:  Scott A M McAdam; Frances C Sussmilch; Timothy J Brodribb
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 7.228

10.  Modelling the structural response of cotton plants to mepiquat chloride and population density.

Authors:  Shenghao Gu; Jochem B Evers; Lizhen Zhang; Lili Mao; Siping Zhang; Xinhua Zhao; Shaodong Liu; Wopke van der Werf; Zhaohu Li
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 4.357

View more
  7 in total

1.  Parameter estimation for functional-structural plant models when data are scarce: using multiple patterns for rejecting unsuitable parameter sets.

Authors:  Ming Wang; Neil White; Jim Hanan; Di He; Enli Wang; Bronwen Cribb; Darren J Kriticos; Dean Paini; Volker Grimm
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  A functional-structural plant model that simulates whole- canopy gas exchange of grapevine plants (Vitis vinifera L.) under different training systems.

Authors:  Jorge A Prieto; Gaetan Louarn; Jorge Perez Peña; Hernán Ojeda; Thierry Simonneau; Eric Lebon
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 3.  The physiology of drought stress in grapevine: towards an integrative definition of drought tolerance.

Authors:  Gregory A Gambetta; Jose Carlos Herrera; Silvina Dayer; Quishuo Feng; Uri Hochberg; Simone D Castellarin
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 6.992

4.  Modeling vegetative vigour in grapevine: unraveling underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  Inés P Hugalde; Cecilia B Agüero; Felipe H Barrios-Masias; Nina Romero; Andy Viet Nguyen; Summaira Riaz; Patricia Piccoli; Andrew J McElrone; M Andrew Walker; Hernán F Vila
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-12-22

5.  Analyzing the Impact of Greenhouse Planting Strategy and Plant Architecture on Tomato Plant Physiology and Estimated Dry Matter.

Authors:  Yue Zhang; Michael Henke; Yiming Li; Demin Xu; Anhua Liu; Xingan Liu; Tianlai Li
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Modelling grape growth in relation to whole-plant carbon and water fluxes.

Authors:  Junqi Zhu; Michel Génard; Stefano Poni; Gregory A Gambetta; Philippe Vivin; Gilles Vercambre; Michael C T Trought; Nathalie Ollat; Serge Delrot; Zhanwu Dai
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 6.992

7.  Nighttime transpiration represents a negligible part of water loss and does not increase the risk of water stress in grapevine.

Authors:  Silvina Dayer; José Carlos Herrera; Zhanwu Dai; Régis Burlett; Laurent J Lamarque; Sylvain Delzon; Giovanni Bortolami; Hervé Cochard; Gregory A Gambetta
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 7.228

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.