Literature DB >> 27255385

Generalized Concentration Addition Modeling Predicts Mixture Effects of Environmental PPARγ Agonists.

James Watt1, Thomas F Webster1, Jennifer J Schlezinger2.   

Abstract

The vast array of potential environmental toxicant combinations necessitates the development of efficient strategies for predicting toxic effects of mixtures. Current practices emphasize the use of concentration addition to predict joint effects of endocrine disrupting chemicals in coexposures. Generalized concentration addition (GCA) is one such method for predicting joint effects of coexposures to chemicals and has the advantage of allowing for mixture components to have differences in efficacy (ie, dose-response curve maxima). Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) is a nuclear receptor that plays a central role in regulating lipid homeostasis, insulin sensitivity, and bone quality and is the target of an increasing number of environmental toxicants. Here, we tested the applicability of GCA in predicting mixture effects of therapeutic (rosiglitazone and nonthiazolidinedione partial agonist) and environmental PPARγ ligands (phthalate compounds identified using EPA's ToxCast database). Transcriptional activation of human PPARγ1 by individual compounds and mixtures was assessed using a peroxisome proliferator response element-driven luciferase reporter. Using individual dose-response parameters and GCA, we generated predictions of PPARγ activation by the mixtures, and we compared these predictions with the empirical data. At high concentrations, GCA provided a better estimation of the experimental response compared with 3 alternative models: toxic equivalency factor, effect summation and independent action. These alternatives provided reasonable fits to the data at low concentrations in this system. These experiments support the implementation of GCA in mixtures analysis with endocrine disrupting compounds and establish PPARγ as an important target for further studies of chemical mixtures.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PPARγ; mixtures; modeling; phthalates

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27255385      PMCID: PMC5013877          DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfw100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  38 in total

1.  The plasticizer diethylhexyl phthalate induces malformations by decreasing fetal testosterone synthesis during sexual differentiation in the male rat.

Authors:  L G Parks; J S Ostby; C R Lambright; B D Abbott; G R Klinefelter; N J Barlow; L E Gray
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Age and sex differences in childhood and adulthood obesity association with phthalates: analyses of NHANES 2007-2010.

Authors:  Melanie C Buser; H Edward Murray; Franco Scinicariello
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 5.840

3.  Defining the impact of weakly estrogenic chemicals on the action of steroidal estrogens.

Authors:  N Rajapakse; D Ong; A Kortenkamp
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  The acute effects of mono(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (MEHP) on testes of prepubertal Wistar rats.

Authors:  M Dalgaard; C Nellemann; H R Lam; I K Sørensen; O Ladefoged
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2001-05-31       Impact factor: 4.372

5.  Generalized concentration addition predicts joint effects of aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonists with partial agonists and competitive antagonists.

Authors:  Gregory J Howard; Jennifer J Schlezinger; Mark E Hahn; Thomas F Webster
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Distinct properties and advantages of a novel peroxisome proliferator-activated protein [gamma] selective modulator.

Authors:  Joel P Berger; Ann E Petro; Karen L Macnaul; Linda J Kelly; Bei B Zhang; Karen Richards; Alex Elbrecht; Bruce A Johnson; Gaochao Zhou; Thomas W Doebber; Chhabi Biswas; Mona Parikh; Neelam Sharma; Michael R Tanen; G Marie Thompson; John Ventre; Alan D Adams; Ralph Mosley; Richard S Surwit; David E Moller
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2003-01-16

7.  Activation of PPARalpha and PPARgamma by environmental phthalate monoesters.

Authors:  Christopher H Hurst; David J Waxman
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 8.  PPARγ signaling and metabolism: the good, the bad and the future.

Authors:  Maryam Ahmadian; Jae Myoung Suh; Nasun Hah; Christopher Liddle; Annette R Atkins; Michael Downes; Ronald M Evans
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 53.440

9.  Characterizing the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPARγ) ligand binding potential of several major flame retardants, their metabolites, and chemical mixtures in house dust.

Authors:  Mingliang Fang; Thomas F Webster; P Lee Ferguson; Heather M Stapleton
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Transgenerational inheritance of increased fat depot size, stem cell reprogramming, and hepatic steatosis elicited by prenatal exposure to the obesogen tributyltin in mice.

Authors:  Raquel Chamorro-García; Margaret Sahu; Rachelle J Abbey; Jhyme Laude; Nhieu Pham; Bruce Blumberg
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  10 in total

1.  Generalized Concentration Addition Model Predicts Glucocorticoid Activity Bioassay Responses to Environmentally Detected Receptor-Ligand Mixtures.

Authors:  Elizabeth Medlock Kakaley; Mary C Cardon; L Earl Gray; Phillip C Hartig; Vickie S Wilson
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Predicting the Activation of the Androgen Receptor by Mixtures of Ligands Using Generalized Concentration Addition.

Authors:  Jennifer J Schlezinger; Wendy Heiger-Bernays; Thomas F Webster
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Generalized concentration addition for ligands that bind to homodimers.

Authors:  Thomas F Webster; Jennifer J Schlezinger
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 2.144

4.  Associations of pregnancy phthalate concentrations and their mixture with early adolescent bone mineral content and density: The Health Outcomes and Measures of the Environment (HOME) study.

Authors:  Jordan R Kuiper; Joseph M Braun; Antonia M Calafat; Bruce P Lanphear; Kim M Cecil; Aimin Chen; Yingying Xu; Kimberly Yolton; Heidi J Kalkwarf; Jessie P Buckley
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Predicting the effects of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance mixtures on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha activity in vitro.

Authors:  Greylin Nielsen; Wendy J Heiger-Bernays; Jennifer J Schlezinger; Thomas F Webster
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 6.  PFAS and Potential Adverse Effects on Bone and Adipose Tissue Through Interactions With PPARγ.

Authors:  Andrea B Kirk; Stephani Michelsen-Correa; Cliff Rosen; Clyde F Martin; Bruce Blumberg
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 5.051

7.  Chemical Mixtures in Household Environments: In Silico Predictions and In Vitro Testing of Potential Joint Action on PPARγ in Human Liver Cells.

Authors:  Celeste K Carberry; Toby Turla; Lauren E Koval; Hadley Hartwell; Rebecca C Fry; Julia E Rager
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-04-19

8.  Physiologically based kinetic modelling based prediction of in vivo rat and human acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibition upon exposure to diazinon.

Authors:  Shensheng Zhao; Sebastiaan Wesseling; Bert Spenkelink; Ivonne M C M Rietjens
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-03-14       Impact factor: 5.153

9.  Assessment of total, ligand-induced peroxisome proliferator activated receptor γ ligand activity in serum.

Authors:  Lariah Edwards; James Watt; Thomas F Webster; Jennifer J Schlezinger
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 5.984

10.  Sensitive image-based chromatin binding assays using inducible ERα to rapidly characterize estrogenic chemicals and mixtures.

Authors:  Adam T Szafran; Maureen G Mancini; Fabio Stossi; Michael A Mancini
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-09-23
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.