Literature DB >> 32726424

Predicting the Activation of the Androgen Receptor by Mixtures of Ligands Using Generalized Concentration Addition.

Jennifer J Schlezinger1, Wendy Heiger-Bernays1, Thomas F Webster1.   

Abstract

Concentration/dose addition is widely used for compounds that act by similar mechanisms. But it cannot make predictions for mixtures of full and partial agonists for effect levels above that of the least efficacious component. As partial agonists are common, we developed generalized concentration addition, which has been successfully applied to systems in which ligands compete for a single binding site. Here, we applied a pharmacodynamic model for a homodimer receptor system with 2 binding sites, the androgen receptor, that acts according to the classic homodimer activation model: Each cytoplasmic monomer protein binds ligand, undergoes a conformational change that relieves inhibition of dimerization, and binds to DNA response elements as a dimer. We generated individual dose-response data for full (dihydroxytestosterone, BMS564929) and partial (TFM-4AS-1) agonists and a competitive antagonist (MDV3100) using reporter data generated in the MDA-kb2 cell line. We used the Schild method to estimate the binding affinity of MDV3100. Data for individual compounds fit the homodimer pharmacodynamic model well. In the presence of a full agonist, the partial agonist had agonistic effects at low effect levels and antagonistic effects at high levels, as predicted by pharmacological theory. The generalized concentration addition model fits the empirical mixtures data-full/full agonist, full/partial agonist, and full agonist/antagonist-as well or better than relative potency factors or effect summation. The ability of generalized concentration addition to predict the activity of mixtures of different types of androgen receptor ligands is important as a number of environmental compounds act as partial androgen receptor agonists or antagonists.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  androgen receptor; antagonist; mixtures; modeling; partial agonist

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32726424      PMCID: PMC7548291          DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfaa108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  35 in total

Review 1.  Disruption of androgen receptor signaling in males by environmental chemicals.

Authors:  Doug C Luccio-Camelo; Gail S Prins
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.292

2.  The suitability of concentration addition for predicting the effects of multi-component mixtures of up to 17 anti-androgens with varied structural features in an in vitro AR antagonist assay.

Authors:  Sibylle Ermler; Martin Scholze; Andreas Kortenkamp
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 4.219

3.  Generalized concentration addition for ligands that bind to homodimers.

Authors:  Thomas F Webster; Jennifer J Schlezinger
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 2.144

4.  Steroid hormone receptor gene expression in human breast cancer cells: inverse relationship between oestrogen and glucocorticoid receptor messenger RNA levels.

Authors:  R E Hall; C S Lee; I E Alexander; J Shine; C L Clarke; R L Sutherland
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1990-12-15       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  The combined antiandrogenic effects of five commonly used pesticides.

Authors:  Mia Birkhøj; Christine Nellemann; Kirsten Jarfelt; Helene Jacobsen; Helle Raun Andersen; Majken Dalgaard; Anne Marie Vinggaard
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  Steroid requirement for androgen receptor dimerization and DNA binding. Modulation by intramolecular interactions between the NH2-terminal and steroid-binding domains.

Authors:  C I Wong; Z X Zhou; M Sar; E M Wilson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1993-09-05       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  The hinge region regulates DNA binding, nuclear translocation, and transactivation of the androgen receptor.

Authors:  Annemie Haelens; Tamzin Tanner; Sarah Denayer; Leen Callewaert; Frank Claessens
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Currently used pesticides and their mixtures affect the function of sex hormone receptors and aromatase enzyme activity.

Authors:  Lisbeth Stigaard Kjeldsen; Mandana Ghisari; Eva Cecilie Bonefeld-Jørgensen
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 9.  Taking the time to study competitive antagonism.

Authors:  D J A Wyllie; P E Chen
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 8.739

10.  'Man Up': the importance and strategy for placing male reproductive health centre stage in the political and research agenda.

Authors:  Christopher L R Barratt; Christopher J De Jonge; Richard M Sharpe
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  1 in total

1.  Predicting the effects of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance mixtures on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha activity in vitro.

Authors:  Greylin Nielsen; Wendy J Heiger-Bernays; Jennifer J Schlezinger; Thomas F Webster
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 4.221

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.