Reena Dave1, David P S O'Brart2, Vijay K Wagh1, Wei S Lim1, Parul Patel1, Jennifer Lee1, John Marshall1. 1. From the Keratoconus Research Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom. 2. From the Keratoconus Research Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: davidobrart@aol.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the long-term efficacy and safety of hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: Hyperopic LASIK was performed using a mechanical microkeratome, an optical zone of 6.5 mm, and a blend zone of 1.5 mm. Simple hyperopia was treated. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 51.6 years (range 34 to 60 years). Preoperatively, the mean spherical equivalent (SE) was +3.74 diopters (D) (range +1.25 to +6.50 D). The mean attempted correction was +3.64 D (range +1.5 to +6.0 D). The mean follow-up was 16.5 years. The mean SE was +0.28 D (range -1.0 to +1.5 D) at 12 months, +0.84 D (range -0.75 to +3.35 D) at 5 years, and +1.74 D (range -0.75 to +4.13 D) at 16 years, representing an increase in hyperopia of +1.47 D ± 1.43 (SD) between 1 year and 16 years (P < .0001) and of +1.13 ± 0.8 D between 5 years and 16 years (P < .03). The uncorrected distance visual acuity improved at 16 years (P < .0001); corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was unchanged (P < .2). The efficacy index was 0.5 and the safety index, 1.09. One eye (3%) lost 2 lines of CDVA. Keratometry remained stable between 1 year and 16 years (P < 1.0). Four eyes (12%) had cataract surgery, and 2 (6%) had laser iridotomy. There was no ectasia. CONCLUSIONS: After hyperopic LASIK, an increase in hyperopia occurred between 1 and 5 years and 16 years. At 16 years, efficacy was limited but with no sight-threatening complications. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES: Dr. Marshall was a consultant to Summit Technology, Inc. Dr. O'Brart holds a noncommercial research grant from Alcon Laboratories, Inc. None of the other authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
PURPOSE: To assess the long-term efficacy and safety of hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: Hyperopic LASIK was performed using a mechanical microkeratome, an optical zone of 6.5 mm, and a blend zone of 1.5 mm. Simple hyperopia was treated. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 51.6 years (range 34 to 60 years). Preoperatively, the mean spherical equivalent (SE) was +3.74 diopters (D) (range +1.25 to +6.50 D). The mean attempted correction was +3.64 D (range +1.5 to +6.0 D). The mean follow-up was 16.5 years. The mean SE was +0.28 D (range -1.0 to +1.5 D) at 12 months, +0.84 D (range -0.75 to +3.35 D) at 5 years, and +1.74 D (range -0.75 to +4.13 D) at 16 years, representing an increase in hyperopia of +1.47 D ± 1.43 (SD) between 1 year and 16 years (P < .0001) and of +1.13 ± 0.8 D between 5 years and 16 years (P < .03). The uncorrected distance visual acuity improved at 16 years (P < .0001); corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was unchanged (P < .2). The efficacy index was 0.5 and the safety index, 1.09. One eye (3%) lost 2 lines of CDVA. Keratometry remained stable between 1 year and 16 years (P < 1.0). Four eyes (12%) had cataract surgery, and 2 (6%) had laser iridotomy. There was no ectasia. CONCLUSIONS: After hyperopic LASIK, an increase in hyperopia occurred between 1 and 5 years and 16 years. At 16 years, efficacy was limited but with no sight-threatening complications. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES: Dr. Marshall was a consultant to Summit Technology, Inc. Dr. O'Brart holds a noncommercial research grant from Alcon Laboratories, Inc. None of the other authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Authors: Petri Mäkinen; Anne Huhtala; Juhani Pietilä; Janika Nättinen; Teppo Rajala; Kalle Salmenhaara; Magomed Udratov; Hannu Uusitalo Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Date: 2019-04-26