Adi Abulafia1, Douglas D Koch2, Li Wang2, Warren E Hill2, Ehud I Assia2, Maria Franchina2, Graham D Barrett2. 1. From Ein-Tal Eye Center (Abulafia, Assia), Tel-Aviv, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center (Abulafia), Zerifin, Meir Medical Center (Assia), and Kfar-Saba, affiliated with Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; Cullen Eye Institute (Koch, Wang), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, and East Valley Ophthalmology (Hill), Mesa, Arizona, USA; Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital (Franchina, Barrett) and Lions Eye Institute (Barrett), Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia. Electronic address: adi.abulafia@gmail.com. 2. From Ein-Tal Eye Center (Abulafia, Assia), Tel-Aviv, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center (Abulafia), Zerifin, Meir Medical Center (Assia), and Kfar-Saba, affiliated with Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; Cullen Eye Institute (Koch, Wang), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, and East Valley Ophthalmology (Hill), Mesa, Arizona, USA; Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital (Franchina, Barrett) and Lions Eye Institute (Barrett), Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the accuracy of 2 toric intraocular lens (IOL) calculators with or without a new regression formula. SETTING: Ein-Tal Eye Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel, and the Lions Eye Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: A new regression formula (Abulafia-Koch) was developed to calculate the estimated total corneal astigmatism based on standard keratometry measurements. The error in the predicted residual astigmatism was calculated by the Alcon and Holladay toric IOL calculators with and without adjustments by the Abulafia-Koch formula. These results were compared with those of the Barrett toric calculator. RESULTS: Data from 78 eyes were evaluated to validate the Abulafia-Koch formula. The centroid errors in predicted residual astigmatism were against-the-rule with the Alcon (0.55 diopter [D]) and Holladay (0.54 D) toric calculators and decreased to 0.05 D (P < .001 [x-axis], P = .776 [y-axis]) and 0.04 D (P < .001 [x-axis], P = .726 [y-axis]) with adjustments by the Abulafia-Koch formula. The Alcon and the Holladay toric calculators had a higher proportion of eyes within ±0.50 D of the predicted residual astigmatism with the Abulafia-Koch formula (76.9% and 78.2%, respectively) than without it (both 30.8%). There were no significant differences between the results of the Abulafia-Koch-modified Alcon and the Holladay toric calculators and those of the Barrett toric calculator. CONCLUSION: Adjustment of commercial toric IOL calculators by the Abulafia-Koch formula significantly improved the prediction of postoperative astigmatic outcome. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Dr. Abulafia received a speaker's fee from Haag-Streit AG. Dr. Barrett has licensed the Barrett Toric Calculator to Haag-Streit AG. Dr. Koch is a consultant to Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Abbott Medical Optics, Inc., and Revision Optics, Inc. Dr. Hill is a paid consultant to Haag-Streit AG and Alcon Laboratories, Inc. None of the other authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the accuracy of 2 toric intraocular lens (IOL) calculators with or without a new regression formula. SETTING: Ein-Tal Eye Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel, and the Lions Eye Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: A new regression formula (Abulafia-Koch) was developed to calculate the estimated total corneal astigmatism based on standard keratometry measurements. The error in the predicted residual astigmatism was calculated by the Alcon and Holladay toric IOL calculators with and without adjustments by the Abulafia-Koch formula. These results were compared with those of the Barrett toric calculator. RESULTS: Data from 78 eyes were evaluated to validate the Abulafia-Koch formula. The centroid errors in predicted residual astigmatism were against-the-rule with the Alcon (0.55 diopter [D]) and Holladay (0.54 D) toric calculators and decreased to 0.05 D (P < .001 [x-axis], P = .776 [y-axis]) and 0.04 D (P < .001 [x-axis], P = .726 [y-axis]) with adjustments by the Abulafia-Koch formula. The Alcon and the Holladay toric calculators had a higher proportion of eyes within ±0.50 D of the predicted residual astigmatism with the Abulafia-Koch formula (76.9% and 78.2%, respectively) than without it (both 30.8%). There were no significant differences between the results of the Abulafia-Koch-modified Alcon and the Holladay toric calculators and those of the Barrett toric calculator. CONCLUSION: Adjustment of commercial toric IOL calculators by the Abulafia-Koch formula significantly improved the prediction of postoperative astigmatic outcome. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Dr. Abulafia received a speaker's fee from Haag-Streit AG. Dr. Barrett has licensed the Barrett Toric Calculator to Haag-Streit AG. Dr. Koch is a consultant to Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Abbott Medical Optics, Inc., and Revision Optics, Inc. Dr. Hill is a paid consultant to Haag-Streit AG and Alcon Laboratories, Inc. None of the other authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Authors: C Kern; L El Kaissi; K Kortuem; M Shajari; E Vounotrypidis; A Langenbucher; S Priglinger; W J Mayer Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2019-12-20 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Ladislav Viktor Nováček; Marie Němcová; Kateřina Tyx; Kristýna Lahodová; Leoš Rejmont; Pavel Rozsíval; Pavel Studený Journal: Biomed Hub Date: 2021-02-17