Literature DB >> 2725267

Orthographic depth and the interaction of visual and auditory processing in word recognition.

R Frost, L Katz.   

Abstract

We studied the influence of word frequency and orthographic depth on the interaction of orthographic and phonetic information in word perception. Native speakers of English and Serbo-Croatian were presented with simultaneous printed and spoken verbal stimuli and had to decide whether they were equivalent. Decision reaction time was measured in three experimental conditions: Clear print and clear speech, degraded print and clear speech, and clear print and degraded speech. Within each language, the effects of visual and auditory degradation were measured, relative to the undegraded presentation. Both effects of degradation were much stronger in English than in Serbo-Croatian. Moreover, they were the same for high- and low-frequency words in both languages. These results can be accounted for by a parallel interactive processing model that assumes lateral connections between the orthographic and phonological systems at all of their levels. The structure of these lateral connections is independent of word frequency and is determined by the relationship between spelling and phonology in the language: simple isomorphic connections between graphemes and phonemes in Serbo-Croatian, but more complex, many-to-one, connections in English.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2725267     DOI: 10.3758/bf03198468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  15 in total

1.  The role of orthographic and phonotactic rules in perceiving letter patterns.

Authors:  K T Spoehr; E E Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: a multilingual comparison.

Authors:  R Frost; L Katz; S Bentin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  A ROWS is a ROSE: spelling, sound, and reading.

Authors:  G C Van Orden
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-05

Review 5.  Perception of the speech code.

Authors:  A M Liberman; F S Cooper; D P Shankweiler; M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Word recognition in Serbo-Croatian is phonologically analytic.

Authors:  L B Feldman; M T Turvey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Relation between pronunciation and recognition of printed words in deep and shallow orthographies.

Authors:  L Katz; L B Feldman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems.

Authors:  M S Seidenberg
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1985-02

9.  The motor theory of speech perception revised.

Authors:  A M Liberman; I G Mattingly
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1985-10

10.  Lexical decision in a phonologically shallow orthography.

Authors:  G Lukatela; D Popadić; P Ognjenović; M T Turvey
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1980-03
View more
  11 in total

1.  Visual phonology: the effects of orthographic consistency on different auditory word recognition tasks.

Authors:  Johannes C Ziegler; Ludovic Ferrand; Marie Montant
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-07

2.  Orthographic facilitation and phonological inhibition in spoken word recognition: a developmental study.

Authors:  Johannes C Ziegler; Mathilde Muneaux
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-02

3.  The low-frequency encoding disadvantage: Word frequency affects processing demands.

Authors:  Rachel A Diana; Lynne M Reder
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Word recognition in two languages and orthographies: English and Greek.

Authors:  H F Chitiri; D M Willows
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-05

5.  Cross-alphabet and cross-modal long-term priming in Serbian and English.

Authors:  Jelena Havelka; Jeffrey S Bowers; Dragan Janković
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

6.  Inefficient stimulus processing at encoding affects formation of high-order general representation: A study on cross-modal word-stem completion task.

Authors:  Laura Sebastiani; Eleonora Castellani; Angelo Gemignani; Fiorenzo Artoni; Danilo Menicucci
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Cross-modal noise compensation in audiovisual words.

Authors:  Martijn Baart; Blair C Armstrong; Clara D Martin; Ram Frost; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Changes in brain activation during sedation induced by dexmedetomidine.

Authors:  Won-Ho Kim; Dongrae Cho; Boreom Lee; Jae-Jin Song; Teo Jeon Shin
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 1.671

9.  Multisensory integration of speech sounds with letters vs. visual speech: only visual speech induces the mismatch negativity.

Authors:  Jeroen J Stekelenburg; Mirjam Keetels; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  The effect of modern standard arabic orthography on speech production by Arab children with hearing loss.

Authors:  Tova Most; Iris Levin; Marwa Sarsour
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2007-11-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.