David Chen1, Naveed Afzal1, Sunghwan Sohn1, Elizabeth B Habermann2, James M Naessens2, David W Larson3, Hongfang Liu4. 1. Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 2. Department of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 3. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 4. Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Electronic address: Liu.hongfang@mayo.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is limited consensus regarding risk factors for postoperative bleeding. The objective of this work was to investigate the capability of machine learning techniques in combination with practice-based longitudinal electronic medical record data for identifying potential new risk factors for postoperative bleeding and predicting patients at high risk of postoperative bleeding. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted for patients who underwent colorectal surgery 1998-2015 at a single tertiary referral center. Various predictors were extracted from electronic medical record. The outcome of interest was the occurrence of postoperative bleeding within 7 days of surgery. Logistic regression and gradient boosting machine models were trained. Area under the receiver operating curve and area under the precision recall curve were used to evaluate the performance to different models. RESULTS: Of 13,399 cases undergoing colorectal resection, 1,680 (12.5%) experienced postoperative bleeding. A total of 299 variables were evaluated. Logistic regression and gradient boosting machine models returned an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.735 and 0.822 and area under the precision recall curve of 0.287 and 0.423, respectively. In addition to well-known risk factors for postoperative bleeding, nutrition (ranked third), weakness (ranked fifth), patient mobility (ranked sixth), and activity level (ranked eighth) were found to be novel predictors in the gradient boosting machine model based on permutation importance. CONCLUSION: The study identified measures of functional capacity of patient as novel predictors of postoperative bleeding. The study found that risk of postoperative bleeding can be assessed, allowing for better use of human resources in addressing this important adverse event after surgery.
BACKGROUND: There is limited consensus regarding risk factors for postoperative bleeding. The objective of this work was to investigate the capability of machine learning techniques in combination with practice-based longitudinal electronic medical record data for identifying potential new risk factors for postoperative bleeding and predicting patients at high risk of postoperative bleeding. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted for patients who underwent colorectal surgery 1998-2015 at a single tertiary referral center. Various predictors were extracted from electronic medical record. The outcome of interest was the occurrence of postoperative bleeding within 7 days of surgery. Logistic regression and gradient boosting machine models were trained. Area under the receiver operating curve and area under the precision recall curve were used to evaluate the performance to different models. RESULTS: Of 13,399 cases undergoing colorectal resection, 1,680 (12.5%) experienced postoperative bleeding. A total of 299 variables were evaluated. Logistic regression and gradient boosting machine models returned an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.735 and 0.822 and area under the precision recall curve of 0.287 and 0.423, respectively. In addition to well-known risk factors for postoperative bleeding, nutrition (ranked third), weakness (ranked fifth), patient mobility (ranked sixth), and activity level (ranked eighth) were found to be novel predictors in the gradient boosting machine model based on permutation importance. CONCLUSION: The study identified measures of functional capacity of patient as novel predictors of postoperative bleeding. The study found that risk of postoperative bleeding can be assessed, allowing for better use of human resources in addressing this important adverse event after surgery.
Authors: Thomas N Robinson; Daniel S Wu; Lauren Pointer; Christina L Dunn; Joseph C Cleveland; Marc Moss Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2013-07-20 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: E Manilich; J D Vogel; R P Kiran; J M Church; Dilara Seyidova-Khoshknabi; F H Remzi Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Omar A Ibrahim; Sunyang Fu; Maria Vassilaki; Ronald C Petersen; Michelle M Mielke; Jennifer St Sauver; Sunghwan Sohn Journal: Proceedings (IEEE Int Conf Bioinformatics Biomed) Date: 2021-12
Authors: Sunyang Fu; Andrew Wen; Gavin M Schaeferle; Patrick M Wilson; Gabriel Demuth; Xiaoyang Ruan; Sijia Liu; Curtis Storlie; Hongfang Liu Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2022-05-23
Authors: Mustafa Bektaş; Jurriaan B Tuynman; Jaime Costa Pereira; George L Burchell; Donald L van der Peet Journal: World J Surg Date: 2022-09-15 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Andrew Wen; Sunyang Fu; Sungrim Moon; Mohamed El Wazir; Andrew Rosenbaum; Vinod C Kaggal; Sijia Liu; Sunghwan Sohn; Hongfang Liu; Jungwei Fan Journal: NPJ Digit Med Date: 2019-12-17
Authors: Floris T M Bosch; Frits I Mulder; Menno V Huisman; Jeffrey I Zwicker; Marcello Di Nisio; Marc Carrier; Annelise Segers; Peter Verhamme; Saskia Middeldorp; Jeffrey I Weitz; Michael A Grosso; Anil Duggal; Harry R Büller; Tzu-Fei Wang; David Garcia; Pieter Willem Kamphuisen; Gary E Raskob; Nick van Es Journal: J Thromb Haemost Date: 2021-09-12 Impact factor: 16.036