Literature DB >> 27251575

The dark side of street lighting: impacts on moths and evidence for the disruption of nocturnal pollen transport.

Callum J Macgregor1,2,3,4, Darren M Evans1,2, Richard Fox3, Michael J O Pocock4.   

Abstract

Among drivers of environmental change, artificial light at night is relatively poorly understood, yet is increasing on a global scale. The community-level effects of existing street lights on moths and their biotic interactions have not previously been studied. Using a combination of sampling methods at matched-pairs of lit and unlit sites, we found significant effects of street lighting: moth abundance at ground level was halved at lit sites, species richness was >25% lower, and flight activity at the level of the light was 70% greater. Furthermore, we found that 23% of moths carried pollen of at least 28 plant species and that there was a consequent overall reduction in pollen transport at lit sites. These findings support the disruptive impact of lights on moth activity, which is one proposed mechanism driving moth declines, and suggest that street lighting potentially impacts upon pollination by nocturnal invertebrates. We highlight the importance of considering both direct and cascading impacts of artificial light.
© 2016 The Authors. Global Change Biology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  Lepidoptera; ecosystem services; flowers; light pollution; population declines; sampling

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27251575     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  20 in total

1.  Artificial light at night as a new threat to pollination.

Authors:  Eva Knop; Leana Zoller; Remo Ryser; Christopher Gerpe; Maurin Hörler; Colin Fontaine
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Nocturnal pollinators strongly contribute to pollen transport of wild flowers in an agricultural landscape.

Authors:  Richard E Walton; Carl D Sayer; Helen Bennion; Jan C Axmacher
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Costs and benefits of "insect friendly" artificial lights are taxon specific.

Authors:  Avalon C S Owens; Caroline T Dressler; Sara M Lewis
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Moths complement bumblebee pollination of red clover: a case for day-and-night insect surveillance.

Authors:  Jamie Alison; Jake M Alexander; Nathan Diaz Zeugin; Yoko L Dupont; Evelin Iseli; Hjalte M R Mann; Toke T Høye
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.812

Review 5.  Exposure to Artificial Light at Night and the Consequences for Flora, Fauna, and Ecosystems.

Authors:  Jack Falcón; Alicia Torriglia; Dina Attia; Françoise Viénot; Claude Gronfier; Francine Behar-Cohen; Christophe Martinsons; David Hicks
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 5.152

6.  Nocturnal city lighting elicits a macroscale response from an insect outbreak population.

Authors:  Elske K Tielens; Paula M Cimprich; Bonne A Clark; Alisha M DiPilla; Jeffrey F Kelly; Djordje Mirkovic; Alva I Strand; Mengyuan Zhai; Phillip M Stepanian
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Artificial night light alters nocturnal prey interception outcomes for morphologically variable spiders.

Authors:  Suet Wai Yuen; Timothy C Bonebrake
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 8.  Dark Matters: Challenges of Nocturnal Communication Between Plants and Animals in Delivery of Pollination Services.

Authors:  Renee M Borges
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2018-03-28

9.  Artificial nighttime lighting impacts visual ecology links between flowers, pollinators and predators.

Authors:  Emmanuelle S Briolat; Kevin J Gaston; Jonathan Bennie; Emma J Rosenfeld; Jolyon Troscianko
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Are pollinating hawk moths declining in the Northeastern United States? An analysis of collection records.

Authors:  Bruce E Young; Stephanie Auer; Margaret Ormes; Giovanni Rapacciuolo; Dale Schweitzer; Nicole Sears
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.