Literature DB >> 27250744

Comparison of Two ELISA Methods and Mass Spectrometry for Measurement of Vitamin D-Binding Protein: Implications for the Assessment of Bioavailable Vitamin D Concentrations Across Genotypes.

Michelle R Denburg1,2, Andrew N Hoofnagle3, Samir Sayed4, Jayanta Gupta5, Ian H de Boer6, Lawrence J Appel7, Ramon Durazo-Arvizu8, Krista Whitehead2, Harold I Feldman2,9, Mary B Leonard10.   

Abstract

Studies using vitamin D-binding protein (DBP) concentrations to estimate free and bioavailable vitamin D have increased dramatically in recent years. Combinations of two single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) produce three major DBP isoforms (Gc1f, Gc1s, and Gc2). A recent study showed that DBP concentrations quantified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) did not differ by race, whereas a widely used monoclonal enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) quantified DBP differentially by isoform, yielding significantly lower DBP concentrations in black versus white individuals. We compared measurements of serum DBP using a monoclonal ELISA, a polyclonal ELISA, and LC-MS/MS in 125 participants in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC). Serum free and bioavailable 25OHD were calculated based on DBP concentrations from these three assays in homozygous participants, and race differences were compared. We confirmed that the monoclonal ELISA quantifies DBP differentially by isoform and showed that the polyclonal ELISA is not subject to this bias. Whereas ≤9% of the variability in DBP concentrations quantified using either LC-MS/MS or the polyclonal ELISA was explained by genotype, 85% of the variability in the monoclonal ELISA-based measures was explained by genotype. DBP concentrations measured by the monoclonal ELISA were disproportionately lower than LC-MS/MS-based results for Gc1f homozygotes (median difference -67%; interquartile range [IQR] -71%, -64%), 95% of whom were black. In contrast, the polyclonal ELISA yielded consistently and similarly higher measurements of DBP than LC-MS/MS, irrespective of genotype, with a median percent difference of +50% (IQR +33%, +65%). Contrary to findings using the monoclonal ELISA, DBP concentrations did not differ by race, and free and bioavailable 25OHD were significantly lower in black versus white participants based on both the polyclonal ELISA and LC-MS/MS, consistent with their lower total 25OHD. Future studies of DBP and free or bioavailable vitamin D metabolites should employ DBP assays that are not biased by DBP genotype.
© 2016 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. © 2016 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BIOAVAILABLE VITAMIN D; GENOTYPE; Gc; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY-TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; VITAMIN D-BINDING PROTEIN

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27250744      PMCID: PMC4945118          DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  51 in total

1.  Critical care and vitamin D status assessment: what about immunoassays and calculated free 25OH-D?

Authors:  Anne-Françoise Rousseau; Pierre Damas; Marc Janssens; Saban Kalin; Didier Ledoux; Caroline Le Goff; Romy Gadisseur; Pierre Delanaye; Etienne Cavalier
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.786

2.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.

Authors:  L I Lin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Vitamin D-binding protein levels do not influence the effect of vitamin D repletion on serum PTH and calcium: data from a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Manish P Ponda; David McGee; Jan L Breslow
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  A comparison of measured and calculated free 25(OH) vitamin D levels in clinical populations.

Authors:  J B Schwartz; J Lai; B Lizaola; L Kane; S Markova; P Weyland; N A Terrault; N Stotland; D Bikle
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Population distribution of the human vitamin D binding protein: anthropological considerations.

Authors:  J Constans; S Hazout; R M Garruto; D C Gajdusek; E K Spees
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.868

6.  Protein chemical characterization of Gc globulin (vitamin D-binding protein) isoforms; Gc-1f, Gc-1s and Gc-2.

Authors:  Maja Christiansen; Charlotte S Jørgensen; Inga Laursen; Daniel Hirschberg; Peter Højrup; Gunnar Houen
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2007-02-12

7.  Vitamin D bioavailability and catabolism in pediatric chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Michelle R Denburg; Heidi J Kalkwarf; Ian H de Boer; Martin Hewison; Justine Shults; Babette S Zemel; David Stokes; Debbie Foerster; Benjamin Laskin; Anthony Ramirez; Mary B Leonard
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2013-06-02       Impact factor: 3.714

8.  Plasma exchange induces vitamin D deficiency.

Authors:  T F Hiemstra; A Casian; P Boraks; D R Jayne; I Schoenmakers
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2013-10-15

9.  Vitamin D-binding protein modifies the vitamin D-bone mineral density relationship.

Authors:  Camille E Powe; Catherine Ricciardi; Anders H Berg; Delger Erdenesanaa; Gina Collerone; Elizabeth Ankers; Julia Wenger; S Ananth Karumanchi; Ravi Thadhani; Ishir Bhan
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Influence of Vitamin D Binding Protein on Accuracy of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Measurement Using the ADVIA Centaur Vitamin D Total Assay.

Authors:  James Freeman; Kimberly Wilson; Ryan Spears; Victoria Shalhoub; Paul Sibley
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.257

View more
  45 in total

1.  Vitamin D and Cardiovascular Disease: Can Novel Measures of Vitamin D Status Improve Risk Prediction and Address the Vitamin D Racial Paradox?

Authors:  Samuel M Kim; Pamela L Lutsey; Erin D Michos
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep       Date:  2017-01-21

Review 2.  Vitamin D assays and the definition of hypovitaminosis D: results from the First International Conference on Controversies in Vitamin D.

Authors:  Christopher T Sempos; Annemieke C Heijboer; Daniel D Bikle; Jens Bollerslev; Roger Bouillon; Patsy M Brannon; Hector F DeLuca; Glenville Jones; Craig F Munns; John P Bilezikian; Andrea Giustina; Neil Binkley
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Associations of Vitamin D-Binding Globulin and Bioavailable Vitamin D Concentrations With Coronary Heart Disease Events: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).

Authors:  Cassianne Robinson-Cohen; Leila R Zelnick; Andrew N Hoofnagle; Pamela L Lutsey; Gregory Burke; Erin D Michos; Steven J C Shea; Russell Tracy; David S Siscovick; Bruce Psaty; Bryan Kestenbaum; Ian H de Boer
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 4.  Analytical considerations for the biochemical assessment of vitamin D status.

Authors:  Lewis Couchman; Cajetan F Moniz
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 5.346

5.  Impact of high-dose vitamin D3 on plasma free 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations and antimicrobial peptides in critically ill mechanically ventilated adults.

Authors:  Jenny E Han; Jessica A Alvarez; Jennifer L Jones; Vin Tangpricha; Mona A Brown; Li Hao; Lou Ann S Brown; Greg S Martin; Thomas R Ziegler
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 4.008

6.  Demographic, lifestyle, and genetic determinants of circulating concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and vitamin D-binding protein in African American and European American women.

Authors:  Song Yao; Chi-Chen Hong; Elisa V Bandera; Qianqian Zhu; Song Liu; Ting-Yuan David Cheng; Gary Zirpoli; Stephen A Haddad; Kathryn L Lunetta; Edward A Ruiz-Narvaez; Susan E McCann; Melissa A Troester; Lynn Rosenberg; Julie R Palmer; Andrew F Olshan; Christine B Ambrosone
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  Temporal increases in 25-hydroxyvitamin D in midlife women: Longitudinal results from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation.

Authors:  Deborah M Mitchell; Kristin Ruppert; Nisha Udupa; Fatima Bassir; Karin Darakananda; Daniel H Solomon; Yinjuan Lian; Jane A Cauley; Arun S Karlamangla; Gail A Greendale; Joel S Finkelstein; Sherri-Ann M Burnett-Bowie
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 3.478

8.  Early pregnancy vitamin D status and risk of preeclampsia.

Authors:  Hooman Mirzakhani; Augusto A Litonjua; Thomas F McElrath; George O'Connor; Aviva Lee-Parritz; Ronald Iverson; George Macones; Robert C Strunk; Leonard B Bacharier; Robert Zeiger; Bruce W Hollis; Diane E Handy; Amitabh Sharma; Nancy Laranjo; Vincent Carey; Weilliang Qiu; Marc Santolini; Shikang Liu; Divya Chhabra; Daniel A Enquobahrie; Michelle A Williams; Joseph Loscalzo; Scott T Weiss
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Racial differences in calculated bioavailable vitamin D with vitamin D/calcium supplementation.

Authors:  Michael T Yin; Ellen S Chan; Todd T Brown; Pablo Tebas; Grace A McComsey; Kathleen M Melbourne; Andrew Napoli; William R Hardin; Heather J Ribaudo; Edgar T Overton
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.177

10.  Have We Been Measuring the Wrong Form of Vitamin D?

Authors:  Courtney Premer; Ivonne H Schulman
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 17.367

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.