Literature DB >> 30972777

Temporal increases in 25-hydroxyvitamin D in midlife women: Longitudinal results from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation.

Deborah M Mitchell1, Kristin Ruppert2, Nisha Udupa1, Fatima Bassir1, Karin Darakananda1, Daniel H Solomon3, Yinjuan Lian2, Jane A Cauley2, Arun S Karlamangla4, Gail A Greendale4, Joel S Finkelstein1, Sherri-Ann M Burnett-Bowie1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) is critical for bone mineralization and may prevent fractures. Understanding vitamin D deficiency trends in midlife women is particularly important given their concurrent menopausal changes that increase risk for fracture. We aimed to evaluate changes in mean 25(OH)D over time and their determinants in a racially, ethnically and socioeconomically diverse cohort of midlife women.
DESIGN: A multi-centre prospective cohort study. PATIENTS: 1585 women ages 42-52 years at baseline. MEASUREMENTS: We measured serum 25(OH)D at 2 time points (1998-2000 and 2009-2011). Between-visit change was assessed in the whole cohort and in socioeconomic and demographic subgroups. Among those with vitamin D deficiency (25(OH)D <30 nmol/L) at baseline, we evaluated determinants of persistent deficiency at follow-up.
RESULTS: Mean 25(OH)D increased from 53.8 to 70.0 nmol/L (P < 0.001), and the prevalence of deficiency decreased from 20.4% to 9.7% (P < 0.001). While baseline 25(OH)D differed among subgroups, the changes in 25(OH)D were similar among groups. The proportion of women reporting dietary supplement use increased from 40.8% to 67.1% (P < 0.001), and the increase in 25(OH)D was significantly higher in supplement users. Among women with vitamin D deficiency at baseline, White women and supplement users were less likely to remain deficient at follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Among midlife women, temporal increases in 25(OH)D concentrations are driven largely by increases in supplement use. The proportion of women with 25(OH)D <30 nmol/L and thus at high risk for skeletal consequences remains substantial. Targeted screening for vitamin D deficiency in populations at risk for fragility fracture may be advisable.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  25-hydroxyvitamin D; dietary supplements; female; humans; menopause; prospective studies; vitamin D deficiency

Year:  2019        PMID: 30972777      PMCID: PMC6565441          DOI: 10.1111/cen.13986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)        ISSN: 0300-0664            Impact factor:   3.478


  39 in total

1.  Characterization of perimenopausal bone loss: a prospective study.

Authors:  R Recker; J Lappe; K Davies; R Heaney
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Assay variation confounds the diagnosis of hypovitaminosis D: a call for standardization.

Authors:  N Binkley; D Krueger; C S Cowgill; L Plum; E Lake; K E Hansen; H F DeLuca; M K Drezner
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 3.  Vitamin D deficiency.

Authors:  Michael F Holick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Tracking of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels during 14 years in a population-based study and during 12 months in an intervention study.

Authors:  Rolf Jorde; Monica Sneve; Moira Hutchinson; Nina Emaus; Yngve Figenschau; Guri Grimnes
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Nutrition advice: the vitamin D-lemma.

Authors:  Amy Maxmen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Bone mineral density loss in relation to the final menstrual period in a multiethnic cohort: results from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN).

Authors:  Gail A Greendale; MaryFran Sowers; Weijuan Han; Mei-Hua Huang; Joel S Finkelstein; Carolyn J Crandall; Jennifer S Lee; Arun S Karlamangla
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Are commonly recommended dosages for vitamin D supplementation too low? Vitamin D status and effects of supplementation on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels--an observational study during clinical practice conditions.

Authors:  G Leidig-Bruckner; H J Roth; T Bruckner; A Lorenz; F Raue; K Frank-Raue
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Vitamin D status: United States, 2001-2006.

Authors:  Anne C Looker; Clifford L Johnson; David A Lacher; Christine M Pfeiffer; Rosemary L Schleicher; Christopher T Sempos
Journal:  NCHS Data Brief       Date:  2011-03

9.  Bone mineralization defects and vitamin D deficiency: histomorphometric analysis of iliac crest bone biopsies and circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D in 675 patients.

Authors:  Matthias Priemel; Christoph von Domarus; Till Orla Klatte; Steffen Kessler; Julia Schlie; Simon Meier; Nils Proksch; Frederic Pastor; Clemens Netter; Thomas Streichert; Klaus Püschel; Michael Amling
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Bone mineral density changes during the menopause transition in a multiethnic cohort of women.

Authors:  Joel S Finkelstein; Sarah E Brockwell; Vinay Mehta; Gail A Greendale; MaryFran R Sowers; Bruce Ettinger; Joan C Lo; Janet M Johnston; Jane A Cauley; Michelle E Danielson; Robert M Neer
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 5.958

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Vitamin D supplementation after the menopause.

Authors:  Faustino R Pérez-López; Peter Chedraui; Stefan Pilz
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 3.565

2.  Trends in Vitamin D Status Around the World.

Authors:  Paul Lips; Renate T de Jongh; Natasja M van Schoor
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2021-11-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.