| Literature DB >> 27248993 |
Ge Wang1, Zehao Li2, Hao Li3, Lidan Li4, Jian Li5, Changyuan Yu6.
Abstract
Jiaqi Ganxian Granule (JGG) is a famous traditional Chinese medicine, which has been long used in clinical practice for treatingEntities:
Keywords: Jiaqi Ganxian granule; liver fibrosis; metabolomics pathway; serum; ultra-performance liquid chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27248993 PMCID: PMC6273034 DOI: 10.3390/molecules21060698
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
The information of the main active components of JGG.
| Herb | Active Component | Ref. |
|---|---|---|
| Paeoniflorin, Albiflorin, Benzoic Acid, Tannins, Triterpenoids, Flavonoids, Phenolic Acids | [ | |
| Polysaccharides, Ketosteroids, Triterpenoids | [ | |
| Pachymic acid, Eburicoic acid, Dehydrotumulosic Acid, Polysaccharide, Heteropolysaccharides | [ | |
| Amygdalin, Botanical, Glycoside, Amygdalin, Lipids | [ | |
| Corydaline, Glaucine, Canadine, Protopine, Tetrahydropalmatine | [ | |
| Biphenols, Polyphenols, Tannins, Magnolol, Honokiol, Neolignans | [ | |
| Isoflavonoids, Astragalosides, Saponins, Polysaccharides | [ | |
| Tannins, Saponins, Flavonoids, Steroids, Alkaloids, Terpenoids, Curcuminoid, Sesquiterpenoids, Furanodiene | [ | |
| Peptide | [ | |
| Vitamins, Essential Amino Acids, Essential Fatty Acids, Isocoumarins, Alkaloid | [ |
Figure 1Effect of JGG on serum levels of CIV, PCIII, HA and LN in CCl4-induced liver fibrosis rats. Value are expressed as .
Figure 2Liver histological changes induced by CCl4 overload and the effects of JGG treatment in rats. Representative microscopic photographs (original magnification: ×100) were obtained from: (A) HE staining of the control group; (B) HE staining of the CCl4 model group; (C) HE staining of the JGG intervention group; (D) Mallory staining of the control group; (E) Mallory staining of the CCl4 model group; (F) Mallory staining of the JGG intervention group.
Figure 3Representative positive TIC chromatograms of serum obtained from the control, model and JGG intervention groups. (A) Control group; (B) CCl4 model group; (C) JGG intervention group.
Figure 4Score plots from the PCA model derived from the UPLC-MS profile of serum obtained from rats. : control; : model; : JGG. The ellipses are only for easier data visualization.
Figure 5Score plot of the pairwise comparison between (A) the control vs. the CCl4 model group. R2X (cum) = 0.494, R2Y (cum) = 0.928, Q2 (cum) = 0.725; (B) JGG vs. the CCl4 model group. R2X(cum) = 0.463, R2Y (cum) = 0.974, Q2 (cum) = 0.827. Loading plot of the pairwise comparison between (C) the control vs. CCl4 model group and (D) JGG vs. the CCl4 model group. NUM is the abbreviation of Number. The ellipses are only for easier data visualization.
Figure 6Variable importance projection plots for the serum metabolites along the component. (A) Control vs. the CCl4 model group using PLS-DA; (B) JGG vs. the CCl4 model group using PLS-DA.
The potential markers of the therapeutic approaches for hepatic fibrosis.
| No. | RT (min) | Measured MS ( | Adduct | Error (mDa) | Metabolites | HMDB Formula | Major Metabolic Pathway | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | ||||||||
| 1 | 0.95 | 132.0777 | 130.0623 | [M + H]+ | 0.9 | Creatine | C4H9N3O2 | Creatine pathway | ↓ b |
| 2 | 9.51 | 302.3050 | -- | [M + H]+ | 0.4 | Sphinganine | C18H39NO2 | Sphingolipid metabolism | ↓ c |
| 3 | 9.66 | 429.2609 | 405.2629 | [M + Na]+ | 0.2 | 3,7-Dihydroxy-12-oxocholanoic acid | C24H38O5 | Fat digestion and absorption | ↑ b |
| 4 | 9.85 | 330.2968 | 328.2448 | [M + H]+ | 3.4 | Dihydroceramide | C19H39NO3 | Sphingolipid metabolism | ↓ b |
| 5 | 10.17 | 839.5669 | 837.5508 | [M + H]+ | 2.5 | PI (18:0/16:0) | C43H83O13P | Glycerophospholipid metabolism | ↑ a |
| 6 | 10.18 | 373.2743 | -- | [M + H]+ | 0.6 | Cervonoyl ethanolamide | C24H36O3 | ↑ c | |
| 7 | 10.56 | 343.2252 | 319.2274 | [M + Na]+ | 0.8 | 8-HETE | C20H32O3 | Arachidonic acid metabolism | ↓ a |
| 8 | 10.75 | 568.3404 | 612.3293 | [M + H]+ | 0.6 | LysoPC (22:6) | C30H50NO7P | Glycerophospholipid metabolism | ↑ c |
| 9 | 10.77 | 520.3398 | 518.2407 | [M + H]+ | 0.0 | LysoPC (18:2) | C26H50NO7P | Glycerophospholipid metabolism | ↑ c |
| 10 | 11.16 | 1047.7383 | 568.3617 | [2M + H]+ | 3.4 | LysoPC (0:0/18:0) | C26H54NO7P | Glycerophospholipid metabolism | ↓ a |
| 11 | 11.21 | 572.3705 | 594.3704 | [M + Na]+ | 1.8 | LysoPC (20:1) | C28H56NO7P | Glycerophospholipid metabolism | ↓ b |
| 12 | 11.25 | 560.3708 | 582.3624 | [M + Na]+ | 2.1 | LysoPC (22:0/0:0) | C27H56NO7P | Glycerophospholipid metabolism | ↓ b |
| 13 | 11.41 | 381.2979 | -- | [M + Na]+ | 0.4 | MG (0:0/18:0/0:0) | C21H42O4 | Glycerophospholipid metabolism | ↓ b |
| 14 | 12.79 | 758.5696 | 802.5616 | [M + H]+ | 0.2 | PC (18:2/16:0) | C42H80NO8P | Glycerophospholipid metabolism | ↑ b |
| 780.5525 | [M + Na]+ | 1.1 | PC (18:2/16:0) | C42H80NO8P | Glycerophospholipid metabolism | ↑ b | |||
| 15 | 13.20 | 760.5880 | 804.5800 | [M + H]+ | 2.9 | PC (18:1/16:0) | C42H82NO8P | Glycerophospholipid metabolism | ↑ c |
| 782.5699 | [M + Na]+ | 2.9 | PC (18:1/16:0) | C42H82NO8P | Glycerophospholipid metabolism | ↑ c | |||
| 16 | 12.63 | 806.5737 | 850.5636 | [M + H]+ | 4.3 | PC (20:4/18:2) | C46H80NO8P | Glycerophospholipid metabolism | ↑ c |
| 828.5555 | [M + Na]+ | 4.1 | PC (20:4/18:2) | C46H80NO9P | Glycerophospholipid metabolism | ↑ c | |||
| 17 | 13.35 | 832.5839 | 830.5999 | [M + H]+ | 1.2 | PC (22:6/18:1) | C46H84NO8P | Glycerophospholipid metabolism | ↑ a |
(Compared to the control group, a p < 0.05; b p < 0.01; c p < 0.001). --: this metabolite can not be found in the MS and MS/MS with negative mode.
Target biomarkers of JGG intervention.
| No. | Metabolites | Metabolic Pathway | Trend | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B/A | C/B | |||
| 1 | Sphinganine | Sphingolipid metabolism | ↓ c | ↑ b |
| 2 | 3,7-Dihydroxy-12-oxocholan-oic acid | Fat digestion and absorption | ↑ b | ↓ a |
| 3 | Dihydroceramide | Sphingolipid metabolism | ↓ b | ↑ c |
| 4 | PI (18:0/16:0) | Glycerophospholipid metabolism | ↑ a | ↓ a |
| 5 | Cervonoyl ethanolamide | ↑ c | ↓ a | |
| 6 | LysoPC (22:6) | Glycerophospholipid metabolism | ↑ c | ↓ c |
| 7 | MG (0:0/18:0/0:0) | Fat digestion and absorption | ↓ b | ↑ c |
| 8 | PC (20:4/18:2) | Glycerophospholipid metabolism | ↑ c | ↓ c |
A: control group; B: model group; C: JGG (a p < 0.05; b p < 0.01; c p < 0.001).
Figure 7The box plots of eight drug target markers.
Figure 8Metabolic pathway of CCl4-induced liver fibrosis and the anti-fibrotic effects of JGG. Content change tendencies are expressed according to the color: red, significant increases (p < 0.05); green, significant decreases: (p < 0.05); black, no significant changes (p > 0.05). The model group compared to the control group; the JGG group compared to the model group.
Figure 9Summary of the pathway analysis with MetPA. (A) Glycerophospholipid metabolism; (B) sphingolipid metabolism.