Literature DB >> 27248705

A GROMOS-Compatible Force Field for Small Organic Molecules in the Condensed Phase: The 2016H66 Parameter Set.

Bruno A C Horta1,2, Pascal T Merz1, Patrick F J Fuchs3, Jozica Dolenc1,4, Sereina Riniker1, Philippe H Hünenberger1.   

Abstract

This article reports on the calibration and validation of a new GROMOS-compatible parameter set 2016H66 for small organic molecules in the condensed phase. The calibration is based on 62 organic molecules spanning the chemical functions alcohol, ether, aldehyde, ketone, carboxylic acid, ester, amine, amide, thiol, sulfide, and disulfide, as well as aromatic compounds and nucleic-acid bases. For 57 organic compounds, the calibration targets are the experimental pure-liquid density ρliq and the vaporization enthalpy ΔHvap, as well as the hydration free energy ΔGwat and the solvation free energy ΔGche in cyclohexane, at atmospheric pressure and at (or close to) room temperature. The final root-mean-square deviations (RMSD) for these four quantities over the set of compounds are 32.4 kg m(-3), 3.5 kJ mol(-1), 4.1 kJ mol(-1), and 2.1 kJ mol(-1), respectively, and the corresponding average deviations (AVED) are 1.0 kg m(-3), 0.2 kJ mol(-1), 2.6 kJ mol(-1), and 1.0 kJ mol(-1), respectively. For the five nucleic-acid bases, the parametrization is performed by transferring the final 2016H66 parameters from analogous organic compounds followed by a slight readjustment of the charges to reproduce the experimental water-to-chloroform transfer free energies ΔGtrn. The final RMSD for this quantity over the five bases is 1.7 kJ mol(-1), and the corresponding AVED is 0.8 kJ mol(-1). As an initial validation of the 2016H66 set, seven additional thermodynamic, transport, and dielectric properties are calculated for the 57 organic compounds in the liquid phase. The agreement with experiment in terms of these additional properties is found to be reasonable, with significant deviations typically affecting either a specific chemical function or a specific molecule. This suggests that in most cases, a classical force-field description along with a careful parametrization against ρliq, ΔHvap, ΔGwat, and ΔGche results in a model that appropriately describes the liquid in terms of a wide spectrum of its physical properties.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27248705     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  23 in total

Review 1.  Force field development phase II: Relaxation of physics-based criteria… or inclusion of more rigorous physics into the representation of molecular energetics.

Authors:  A T Hagler
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  A lithium-oxygen battery with a long cycle life in an air-like atmosphere.

Authors:  Mohammad Asadi; Baharak Sayahpour; Pedram Abbasi; Anh T Ngo; Klas Karis; Jacob R Jokisaari; Cong Liu; Badri Narayanan; Marc Gerard; Poya Yasaei; Xuan Hu; Arijita Mukherjee; Kah Chun Lau; Rajeev S Assary; Fatemeh Khalili-Araghi; Robert F Klie; Larry A Curtiss; Amin Salehi-Khojin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Ionic Liquids and Electrolytes Using Polarizable Force Fields.

Authors:  Dmitry Bedrov; Jean-Philip Piquemal; Oleg Borodin; Alexander D MacKerell; Benoît Roux; Christian Schröder
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Force Fields for Small Molecules.

Authors:  Fang-Yu Lin; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2019

5.  Reparameterization of Solute-Solute Interactions for Amino Acid-Sugar Systems Using Isopiestic Osmotic Pressure Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Wesley K Lay; Mark S Miller; Adrian H Elcock
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Escaping Atom Types in Force Fields Using Direct Chemical Perception.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Caitlin C Bannan; Andrea Rizzi; Christopher I Bayly; John D Chodera; Victoria T Lim; Nathan M Lim; Kyle A Beauchamp; David R Slochower; Michael R Shirts; Michael K Gilson; Peter K Eastman
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 6.006

7.  Impact of electronic polarizability on protein-functional group interactions.

Authors:  Himanshu Goel; Wenbo Yu; Vincent D Ustach; Asaminew H Aytenfisu; Delin Sun; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 3.676

Review 8.  Recent progress in general force fields of small molecules.

Authors:  Xibing He; Brandon Walker; Viet H Man; Pengyu Ren; Junmei Wang
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 6.809

9.  Determining the hydration free energies of selected small molecules with MP2 and local MP2 through adaptive force matching.

Authors:  Dong Zheng; Ying Yuan; Feng Wang
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2021-03-14       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  Rapid and accurate estimation of protein-ligand relative binding affinities using site-identification by ligand competitive saturation.

Authors:  Himanshu Goel; Anthony Hazel; Vincent D Ustach; Sunhwan Jo; Wenbo Yu; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 9.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.