Davendra P S Sohal1, Pamela B Mangu1, Alok A Khorana1, Manish A Shah1, Philip A Philip1, Eileen M O'Reilly1, Hope E Uronis1, Ramesh K Ramanathan1, Christopher H Crane1, Anitra Engebretson1, Joseph T Ruggiero1, Mehmet S Copur1, Michelle Lau1, Susan Urba1, Daniel Laheru1. 1. Davendra P.S. Sohal and Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Pamela B. Mangu, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Manish A. Shah, The Weill Cornell Medical Center; Philip A. Philip, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit; Susan Urba, University of Michigan Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Eileen M. O'Reilly, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Joseph T. Ruggiero, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Hope E. Uronis, Duke University, Durham, NC; Ramesh K. Ramanathan, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale; Michelle Lau, Community Hospital Based Cancer Center, Tempe, AZ; Christopher H. Crane, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Anitra Engebretson, Patient Representative, Portland, OR; Mehmet S. Copur, St Francis Medical Center, Grand Island, NE; and Daniel Laheru, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To provide evidence-based recommendations to oncologists and others for the treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. METHODS: American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, gastroenterology, palliative care, and advocacy experts to conduct a systematic review of the literature from April 2004 to June 2015. Outcomes were overall survival, disease-free survival, progression-free survival, and adverse events. RESULTS: Twenty-four randomized controlled trials met the systematic review criteria. RECOMMENDATIONS: A multiphase computed tomography scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis should be performed. Baseline performance status and comorbidity profile should be evaluated. Goals of care, patient preferences, treatment response, psychological status, support systems, and symptom burden should guide decisions for treatments. A palliative care referral should occur at first visit. FOLFIRINOX (leucovorin, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin; favorable comorbidity profile) or gemcitabine plus nanoparticle albumin-bound (NAB) -paclitaxel (adequate comorbidity profile) should be offered to patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0 to 1 based on patient preference and support system available. Gemcitabine alone is recommended for patients with ECOG PS 2 or with a comorbidity profile that precludes other regimens; the addition of capecitabine or erlotinib may be offered. Patients with an ECOG PS ≥ 3 and poorly controlled comorbid conditions should be offered cancer-directed therapy only on a case-by-case basis; supportive care should be emphasized. For second-line therapy, gemcitabine plus NAB-paclitaxel should be offered to patients with first-line treatment with FOLFIRINOX, an ECOG PS 0 to 1, and a favorable comorbidity profile; fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin, irinotecan, or nanoliposomal irinotecan should be offered to patients with first-line treatment with gemcitabine plus NAB-paclitaxel, ECOG PS 0 to 1, and favorable comorbidity profile, and gemcitabine or fluorouracil should be offered to patients with either an ECOG PS 2 or a comorbidity profile that precludes other regimens. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/guidelines/MetPC and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki.
PURPOSE: To provide evidence-based recommendations to oncologists and others for the treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. METHODS: American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, gastroenterology, palliative care, and advocacy experts to conduct a systematic review of the literature from April 2004 to June 2015. Outcomes were overall survival, disease-free survival, progression-free survival, and adverse events. RESULTS: Twenty-four randomized controlled trials met the systematic review criteria. RECOMMENDATIONS: A multiphase computed tomography scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis should be performed. Baseline performance status and comorbidity profile should be evaluated. Goals of care, patient preferences, treatment response, psychological status, support systems, and symptom burden should guide decisions for treatments. A palliative care referral should occur at first visit. FOLFIRINOX (leucovorin, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin; favorable comorbidity profile) or gemcitabine plus nanoparticle albumin-bound (NAB) -paclitaxel (adequate comorbidity profile) should be offered to patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0 to 1 based on patient preference and support system available. Gemcitabine alone is recommended for patients with ECOG PS 2 or with a comorbidity profile that precludes other regimens; the addition of capecitabine or erlotinib may be offered. Patients with an ECOG PS ≥ 3 and poorly controlled comorbid conditions should be offered cancer-directed therapy only on a case-by-case basis; supportive care should be emphasized. For second-line therapy, gemcitabine plus NAB-paclitaxel should be offered to patients with first-line treatment with FOLFIRINOX, an ECOG PS 0 to 1, and a favorable comorbidity profile; fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin, irinotecan, or nanoliposomal irinotecan should be offered to patients with first-line treatment with gemcitabine plus NAB-paclitaxel, ECOG PS 0 to 1, and favorable comorbidity profile, and gemcitabine or fluorouracil should be offered to patients with either an ECOG PS 2 or a comorbidity profile that precludes other regimens. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/guidelines/MetPC and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki.
Authors: Arti Hurria; Kayo Togawa; Supriya G Mohile; Cynthia Owusu; Heidi D Klepin; Cary P Gross; Stuart M Lichtman; Ajeet Gajra; Smita Bhatia; Vani Katheria; Shira Klapper; Kurt Hansen; Rupal Ramani; Mark Lachs; F Lennie Wong; William P Tew Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-08-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Thierry Conroy; Françoise Desseigne; Marc Ychou; Olivier Bouché; Rosine Guimbaud; Yves Bécouarn; Antoine Adenis; Jean-Luc Raoul; Sophie Gourgou-Bourgade; Christelle de la Fouchardière; Jaafar Bennouna; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Faiza Khemissa-Akouz; Denis Péré-Vergé; Catherine Delbaldo; Eric Assenat; Bruno Chauffert; Pierre Michel; Christine Montoto-Grillot; Michel Ducreux Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-05-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: A Maraveyas; J Waters; R Roy; D Fyfe; D Propper; F Lofts; J Sgouros; E Gardiner; K Wedgwood; C Ettelaie; G Bozas Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2011-11-17 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Giuseppe Colucci; Roberto Labianca; Francesco Di Costanzo; Vittorio Gebbia; Giacomo Cartenì; Bruno Massidda; Elisa Dapretto; Luigi Manzione; Elena Piazza; Mirella Sannicolò; Marco Ciaparrone; Luigi Cavanna; Francesco Giuliani; Evaristo Maiello; Antonio Testa; Paolo Pederzoli; Massimo Falconi; Ciro Gallo; Massimo Di Maio; Francesco Perrone Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jürg Bernhard; Daniel Dietrich; Werner Scheithauer; Daniela Gerber; György Bodoky; Thomas Ruhstaller; Bengt Glimelius; Emilio Bajetta; Johannes Schüller; Piercarlo Saletti; Jean Bauer; Arie Figer; Bernhard C Pestalozzi; Claus-Henning Köhne; Walter Mingrone; Salomon M Stemmer; Karin Tàmas; Gabriela V Kornek; Dieter Koeberle; Richard Herrmann Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-08-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jordan D Berlin; Paul Catalano; James P Thomas; John W Kugler; Daniel G Haller; Al Bowen Benson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-08-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Caio M Rocha Lima; Mark R Green; Robert Rotche; Wilson H Miller; G Mark Jeffrey; Laura A Cisar; Adele Morganti; Nicoletta Orlando; Gabriela Gruia; Langdon L Miller Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-09-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Philippe Rougier; Hanno Riess; Robert Manges; Petr Karasek; Yves Humblet; Carlo Barone; Armando Santoro; Sylvie Assadourian; Laurence Hatteville; Philip A Philip Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2013-04-30 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Matteo Figini; Xifu Wang; Tianchu Lyu; Zhanliang Su; Bin Wang; Chong Sun; Junjie Shangguan; Liang Pan; Kang Zhou; Quanhong Ma; Vahid Yaghmai; Daniele Procissi; Andrew C Larson; Zhuoli Zhang Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: Davendra P S Sohal; Erin B Kennedy; Alok Khorana; Mehmet S Copur; Christopher H Crane; Ignacio Garrido-Laguna; Smitha Krishnamurthi; Cassadie Moravek; Eileen M O'Reilly; Philip A Philip; Ramesh K Ramanathan; Joseph T Ruggiero; Manish A Shah; Susan Urba; Hope E Uronis; Michelle W Lau; Daniel Laheru Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Justin A Barnes; Melissa L Ellis; Sharon Hwang; Joan Emarine; Patti Merwin; Gregory D Salinas; Benjamin L Musher Journal: J Gastrointest Cancer Date: 2019-03
Authors: Joseph Carmicheal; Chihiro Hayashi; Xi Huang; Lei Liu; Yao Lu; Alexey Krasnoslobodtsev; Alexander Lushnikov; Prakash G Kshirsagar; Asish Patel; Maneesh Jain; Yuri L Lyubchenko; Yongfeng Lu; Surinder K Batra; Sukhwinder Kaur Journal: Nanomedicine Date: 2018-12-11 Impact factor: 5.307