Literature DB >> 29177608

Identification of Educational Gaps Among Oncologists Who Manage Patients with Pancreatic Cancer.

Justin A Barnes1, Melissa L Ellis2, Sharon Hwang2, Joan Emarine3, Patti Merwin3, Gregory D Salinas2, Benjamin L Musher4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is associated with poor outcomes and presents oncologists with a myriad of clinical challenges. This study was conducted to assess oncologists' practice patterns and to identify the greatest areas of need for future PDA continuing medical education (CME) programs.
METHODS: Case vignettes have been validated as an effective tool to assess how physicians approach and treat a wide array of diseases. In order to assess practice patterns for resectable, locally advanced unresectable, and metastatic PDA, an online case vignette survey was distributed to practicing medical oncologists.
RESULTS: Responses from 150 US-practicing oncologists were analyzed, and several key opportunities for future CME programs were identified. For case 1 (patient with resectable PDA), 44% of oncologists did not select an evidence-based adjuvant chemotherapy regimen. For case 2 (patient with locally advanced PDA who develops metastases and neuropathy after first-line nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine followed by chemoradiation), 57% of oncologists did not select an evidence-based second-line chemotherapy regimen, and 35% selected a regimen containing oxaliplatin, a chemotherapeutic known to cause neuropathy. For case 3 (patient with a pancreatic mass and liver metastases), only 34% of oncologists recommended a biopsy, chest imaging, and liver function tests which should be standard of care assessments with this presentation. For all three cases, clinical trial referral was selected by fewer than 5% of respondents.
CONCLUSIONS: This study identified appreciable discrepancies between oncologists' recommendations and standard evidence-based guidelines. Well-designed CME programs may help to bridge the educational gaps identified and improve adherence to practice guidelines.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Educational needs assessment; Medical oncologist; Pancreatic cancer; Survey

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29177608     DOI: 10.1007/s12029-017-0033-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer


  31 in total

1.  Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine vs observation in patients undergoing curative-intent resection of pancreatic cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Helmut Oettle; Stefan Post; Peter Neuhaus; Klaus Gellert; Jan Langrehr; Karsten Ridwelski; Harald Schramm; Joerg Fahlke; Carl Zuelke; Christof Burkart; Klaus Gutberlet; Erika Kettner; Harald Schmalenberg; Karin Weigang-Koehler; Wolf-Otto Bechstein; Marco Niedergethmann; Ingo Schmidt-Wolf; Lars Roll; Bernd Doerken; Hanno Riess
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  An automated scoring algorithm for computerized clinical vignettes: evaluating physician performance against explicit quality criteria.

Authors:  J Luck; J W Peabody; B L Lewis
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2006 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 4.046

3.  A cross-national comparison of the quality of clinical care using vignettes.

Authors:  John W Peabody; Anli Liu
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 3.344

Review 4.  Continuing medical education effect on practice performance: effectiveness of continuing medical education: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Educational Guidelines.

Authors:  Dave Davis; Robert Galbraith
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  A meta-analysis of continuing medical education effectiveness.

Authors:  Maliheh Mansouri; Jocelyn Lockyer
Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Impact of formal continuing medical education: do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes?

Authors:  D Davis; M A O'Brien; N Freemantle; F M Wolf; P Mazmanian; A Taylor-Vaisey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-09-01       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality.

Authors:  J W Peabody; J Luck; P Glassman; T R Dresselhaus; M Lee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-04-05       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Variations in referral patterns to high-volume centers for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  David C Chang; Yiyi Zhang; Debraj Mukherjee; Christopher L Wolfgang; Richard D Schulick; John L Cameron; Nita Ahuja
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Future of cancer incidence in the United States: burdens upon an aging, changing nation.

Authors:  Benjamin D Smith; Grace L Smith; Arti Hurria; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Thomas A Buchholz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Measuring the quality of physician practice by using clinical vignettes: a prospective validation study.

Authors:  John W Peabody; Jeff Luck; Peter Glassman; Sharad Jain; Joyce Hansen; Maureen Spell; Martin Lee
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.