PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To determine test-re-test reliabilities of novel Evoked Response Potential (ERP)-based Brain Network Activation (BNA) scores in healthy athletes. RESEARCH DESIGN: Observational, repeated-measures study. METHODS AND DESIGN: Forty-two healthy male and female high school and collegiate athletes completed auditory oddball and go/no-go ERP assessments at baseline, 1 week, 6 weeks and 1 year. The BNA algorithm was applied to the ERP data, considering electrode location, frequency band, peak latency and normalized amplitude to generate seven unique BNA scores for each testing session. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Mean BNA scores, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) values and reliable change (RC) values were calculated for each of the seven BNA networks. BNA scores ranged from 46.3 ± 34.9 to 69.9 ± 22.8, ICC values ranged from 0.46-0.65 and 95% RC values ranged from 38.3-68.1 across the seven networks. CONCLUSIONS: The wide range of BNA scores observed in this population of healthy athletes suggests that a single BNA score or set of BNA scores from a single after-injury test session may be difficult to interpret in isolation without knowledge of the athlete's own baseline BNA score(s) and/or the results of serial tests performed at additional time points. The stability of each BNA network should be considered when interpreting test-re-test BNA score changes.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To determine test-re-test reliabilities of novel Evoked Response Potential (ERP)-based Brain Network Activation (BNA) scores in healthy athletes. RESEARCH DESIGN: Observational, repeated-measures study. METHODS AND DESIGN: Forty-two healthy male and female high school and collegiate athletes completed auditory oddball and go/no-go ERP assessments at baseline, 1 week, 6 weeks and 1 year. The BNA algorithm was applied to the ERP data, considering electrode location, frequency band, peak latency and normalized amplitude to generate seven unique BNA scores for each testing session. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Mean BNA scores, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) values and reliable change (RC) values were calculated for each of the seven BNA networks. BNA scores ranged from 46.3 ± 34.9 to 69.9 ± 22.8, ICC values ranged from 0.46-0.65 and 95% RC values ranged from 38.3-68.1 across the seven networks. CONCLUSIONS: The wide range of BNA scores observed in this population of healthy athletes suggests that a single BNA score or set of BNA scores from a single after-injury test session may be difficult to interpret in isolation without knowledge of the athlete's own baseline BNA score(s) and/or the results of serial tests performed at additional time points. The stability of each BNA network should be considered when interpreting test-re-test BNA score changes.
Authors: Thomas W McAllister; James C Ford; Laura A Flashman; Arthur Maerlender; Richard M Greenwald; Jonathan G Beckwith; Richard P Bolander; Tor D Tosteson; John H Turco; Rema Raman; Sonia Jain Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Wesley R Cole; Jacques P Arrieux; Karen Schwab; Brian J Ivins; Felicia M Qashu; Steven C Lewis Journal: Arch Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2013-07-02 Impact factor: 2.813
Authors: Anthony P Kontos; Amit Reches; R J Elbin; Dalia Dickman; Ilan Laufer; Amir B Geva; Galit Shacham; Ryan DeWolf; Michael W Collins Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 3.978
Authors: Steven P Broglio; Richelle Williams; Ashley Rettmann; Brandon Moore; James T Eckner; Sean Meehan Journal: Clin J Sport Med Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 3.638
Authors: Steven P Broglio; Richelle Williams; Andrew Lapointe; Ashley Rettmann; Brandon Moore; Sean K Meehan; James T Eckner Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 4.003