Steven P Broglio, Richelle Williams1, Ashley Rettmann1, Brandon Moore2, James T Eckner3, Sean Meehan4. 1. NeuroTrauma Research Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. 2. Michigan NeuroSport, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. 3. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Michigan NeuroSport, University of Michigan. 4. Human Sensorimotor Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate neuroelectric and cognitive function relative to a season of football participation. Cognitive and neuroelectric function declines are hypothesized to be present in football athletes. DESIGN: Observational. SETTING: Athletic fields and research laboratory. PATIENTS (OR PARTICIPANTS): Seventy-seven high school athletes (15.9 + 0.9 years, 178.6 + 7.2 cm, 74.4 + 14.7 kg, and 0.8 + 0.8 self-reported concussions) participating in football (n = 46) and noncontact sports (n = 31). INTERVENTIONS (OR ASSESSMENT OF RISK FACTORS): All athletes completed preseason, midseason, and postseason assessments of cognitive and neuroelectric function, self-reported symptoms, and quality of life. All athletes participated in their respective sports without intervention, while head impact exposure in football athletes was tracked using the Head Impact Telemetry System. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cognitive performance was based on Cogstate computerized cognitive assessment tool processing speed, attention, learning, working memory speed, and working memory accuracy scores. ElMindA brain network activation amplitude, synchronization, timing and connectivity brain network activation scores demarcated neuroelectric performance. Quality of life was assessed on the Health Behavior Inventory and Satisfaction with Life Scale and symptoms on the SCAT3 inventory. RESULTS: Football and control sport athletes did not show declines in cognitive or neuroelectric function, quality-of-life measures, or symptom reports across a season of sport participation. CONCLUSIONS: These findings refute the notion that routine football participation places athletes at risk for acute cognitive declines. The lack of impairment may be associated with no association with head impacts and cognitive function, increased physical activity offsetting any declines, and/or test sensitivity. How these findings are associated with long-term cognitive function is unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate neuroelectric and cognitive function relative to a season of football participation. Cognitive and neuroelectric function declines are hypothesized to be present in football athletes. DESIGN: Observational. SETTING: Athletic fields and research laboratory. PATIENTS (OR PARTICIPANTS): Seventy-seven high school athletes (15.9 + 0.9 years, 178.6 + 7.2 cm, 74.4 + 14.7 kg, and 0.8 + 0.8 self-reported concussions) participating in football (n = 46) and noncontact sports (n = 31). INTERVENTIONS (OR ASSESSMENT OF RISK FACTORS): All athletes completed preseason, midseason, and postseason assessments of cognitive and neuroelectric function, self-reported symptoms, and quality of life. All athletes participated in their respective sports without intervention, while head impact exposure in football athletes was tracked using the Head Impact Telemetry System. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cognitive performance was based on Cogstate computerized cognitive assessment tool processing speed, attention, learning, working memory speed, and working memory accuracy scores. ElMindA brain network activation amplitude, synchronization, timing and connectivity brain network activation scores demarcated neuroelectric performance. Quality of life was assessed on the Health Behavior Inventory and Satisfaction with Life Scale and symptoms on the SCAT3 inventory. RESULTS: Football and control sport athletes did not show declines in cognitive or neuroelectric function, quality-of-life measures, or symptom reports across a season of sport participation. CONCLUSIONS: These findings refute the notion that routine football participation places athletes at risk for acute cognitive declines. The lack of impairment may be associated with no association with head impacts and cognitive function, increased physical activity offsetting any declines, and/or test sensitivity. How these findings are associated with long-term cognitive function is unknown.
Authors: Laura Chaddock; Kirk I Erickson; Ruchika Shaurya Prakash; Matt VanPatter; Michelle W Voss; Matthew B Pontifex; Lauren B Raine; Charles H Hillman; Arthur F Kramer Journal: Dev Neurosci Date: 2010-08-06 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Charles H Hillman; Matthew B Pontifex; Darla M Castelli; Naiman A Khan; Lauren B Raine; Mark R Scudder; Eric S Drollette; Robert D Moore; Chien-Ting Wu; Keita Kamijo Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Anthony P Kontos; Amit Reches; R J Elbin; Dalia Dickman; Ilan Laufer; Amir B Geva; Galit Shacham; Ryan DeWolf; Michael W Collins Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 3.978
Authors: Bennet I Omalu; Steven T DeKosky; Ronald L Hamilton; Ryan L Minster; M Ilyas Kamboh; Abdulrezak M Shakir; Cyril H Wecht Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Virginia T Gallagher; Prianka Murthy; Jane Stocks; Brian Vesci; Danielle Colegrove; Jeffrey Mjaanes; Yufen Chen; Hans Breiter; Cynthia LaBella; Amy A Herrold; James L Reilly Journal: Neurotrauma Rep Date: 2020-11-10