Literature DB >> 27239422

Cachexia research in Japan: facts and numbers on prevalence, incidence and clinical impact.

Masaaki Konishi1, Junichi Ishida1, Jochen Springer1, Stefan D Anker1, Stephan von Haehling1.   

Abstract

Even though most clinical data on cachexia have been reported from Western countries, cachexia may be a growing problem in Asia as well, as the population in this area of the world is considerably larger. Considering the current definitions of obesity and sarcopenia in Japan, which are different from the ones in Western countries, the lack of a distinct cachexia definition in Japan is strinking. Only one epidemiological study has reported the prevalence of cachexia using weight loss as part of the definition in patients with stage III or IV non-small cell lung cancer. Although the reported prevalence of 45.6% is within the range of that in Western countries (28-57% in advanced cancer), we cannot compare the prevalence of cachexia in other types of cancer, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and kidney disease (CKD) between Japan and Western countries. In patients with heart failure, one third of Japanese patients has a body mass index <20.3 kg/m2 whereas the prevalence of underweight is 13.6% in reports from Western countries. These results may suggest that there are more cachectic heart failure patients in Japan, or that using the same definition like Western countries leads to gross overestimation of the prevalence of cachexia in Japan. The rate of underweight patients in COPD has been reported as 31-41% in COPD and seems to be high in comparison to the prevalence of cachexia in Western countries (27-35%). The reported lowest quartile value of BMI (19.6 kg/m2) in CKD may match with the prevalence of cachexia in Western countries (30-60%). The number of clinical trials targeting cachexia is very limited in Japan so far.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cachexia; Incidence; Japan; Prevalence; Treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27239422      PMCID: PMC4864161          DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle        ISSN: 2190-5991            Impact factor:   12.910


Cachexia is a complex metabolic syndrome associated with underlying illness, characterized by loss of muscle with or without loss of fat mass, and clinically diagnosed by the criteria including existence of underlying chronic disease, significant weight loss, and several evidences of abnormal metabolism.1 Because of the increasing prevalence of chronic diseases associated with the development of cachexia in advancing age, there is a large number of cachexia‐related hospitalizations with increasing costs in Western countries.2 Although most clinical data on cachexia have been reported from Western countries, cachexia may be a growing problem because of the larger population in Asia as well.3 As the definition of cachexia includes body weight, we have to pay attention to the fact that the body size in Asian people is different from that in Western countries because of difference in diet, lifestyle, and metabolism.4 For example, the cutoff value of the body mass index (BMI) for the definition of obesity is smaller in Japan than in Western countries (≥25 kg/m2 in Japan5 and ≥30 kg/m2 in Western countries). Hence, there is still some possibility that not only the prevalence but also the ideal therapeutic strategies are different between in Asian people and Caucasians. Research results in Japan as an Asian aged country could become more important both for Asia and western countries.

The present state of cachexia in Japan

Although the researchers in Asia have proposed an Asian definition for sarcopenia, which includes different cutoff values of muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance than that for Western countries,6, 7 there has been no distinct Asian definition for cachexia so far. A simple quotation from the global definition of cachexia8 has been included in the Clinical Guidelines for Infusion Therapy in Advanced Cancer Patients 2013 edited by the Japanese Society for Palliative Medicine, which is the only one cachexia definition with a cutoff for weight loss in Japan.9 No other definition of cachexia is shown in guidelines for chronic diseases such as heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or chronic kidney disease (CKD). Regarding heart failure, unintentional weight loss is alerted as cachexia in Guidelines for Treatment of Acute Heart Failure.10 For COPD patients, nutritional evaluation including weight assessment are recommended in a section of ‘Nutrition management’ in the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of COPD (3rd edition) without referring to cachexia itself.11 In CKD guidelines, continual diet therapy is recommended without referring to cachexia itself.12 Lack of distinct cachexia definitions in Japan does not necessarily mean that researchers have accepted the global definition but may rather suggest that many researchers have not paid much attention to cachexia. In fact, there seems to be only one epidemiological research study reporting the prevalence of cachexia using weight loss as a part of the definition. Kimura et al. retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of consecutive patients with stage III or IV non‐small cell lung cancer who had received their first‐line chemotherapy, after having excluded those who were candidates for curative radiotherapy or who had received palliative radiotherapy.13 Cachexia, defined as a body weight loss >5% over the past 6 month or >2% in patients with a BMI <20 kg/m2, was observed in 45.6% of the overall cohort, and its presence was associated with a poor prognosis. Although this number is within the range of Western countries (the prevalence ranging from 28 to 57% in advanced cancer14 and 50–80% in several types of cancer15), we cannot compare the prevalence of cachexia in other types of cancer, heart failure, COPD, and CKD between Japan and Western countries. Hence, here we listed epidemiologic researches ‘suggesting’ the prevalence of cachexia, which includes BMI data in chronic diseases (Table 1). In recent years, a significant amount of data has been updated. However, many of these reports16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 had criteria including only BMI cut‐off of 18.5 kg/m2, which is related to the World Health Organization definition of ‘malnutrition’.22 Table 1 includes the data with tertile or quantile value of BMI, if the value is close to 20 kg/m2, which is one of the criteria in universal cachexia definition.1 The lack of data with regards to weight loss in most of the listed reports may be because of the fact that such data cannot be assembled from many databases in retrospect, if the researchers did not record the history of weight loss at the beginning of the studies. According to the epidemiologic data with BMI, one‐thirds of Japanese heart failure patients had a BMI <20.3 kg/m2 23 whereas the prevalence of underweight (BMI <20.7 kg/m2) was 13.6% in reports from Western countries.24 These data may suggest that there are more cachectic heart failure patients in Japan than in Western countries, or that the use of the same definition as in Western countries can overestimate the prevalence of cachexia in Japan. Although direct comparisons between Japan and Western countries cannot be performed either in CKD and COPD, the reported lowest quartile value of BMI (19.6 kg/m2) in CKD25 may match the prevalence of Western countries (30–60%14). In COPD, the rate of low BMI (<20 kg/m2) and underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m2) patients were 41%26 and 31%,21 which seem to be high in comparison with the prevalence of cachexia in Western countries (27–35%).14
Table 1

Epidemiologic researches suggesting the prevalence of cachexia

DiseaseInclusion criteriaExclusion criteriaReferenceDefinition used N Prevalence (%)
CancerAdvanced NSCLC planned to CTPatients planned to radiotherapyKimura et al. 2015 13 CachexiaWeight loss >5% over 6 month or >2% in patients with a BMI <20 kg/m2 13446
Head and neck cancerNoneTakenaka et al. 2014 16 UnderweightBMI <18.5 kg/m2 72618
Breast cancer planned to CT and surgeryDistant metastasisIwase et al. 2014 17 UnderweightBMI <18.5 kg/m2 2487
Stomach cancerNoneMinami et al. 2015 18 UnderweightBMI <18.5 kg/m2 10338
Chronic HFStable HFNoneNochioka et al. 2010 19 UnderweightBMI <18.5 kg/m2 9729
Hospitalized HFAcute CVD, dialysis, cancerTakiguchi et al. 2014 20 UnderweightBMI <18.5 kg/m2 64813
Hospitalized HFNoneHamaguchi et al. 2010 23 Lower tertile in BMIBMI <20.3 kg/m2 2488(33)
Hospitalized HFAMI, dialysis, cardiac surgeryKomukai et al. 2012 42 Lowest quartile in BMIBMI ≤21.4 kg/m2 219(25)
CKDHemodialysisAcute CVD, active infection, cancerTakahashi et al. 2012 25 Lowest quartile in BMIBMI <19.6 kg/m2 1228(25)
COPDStable COPDTuberculosis, cancerHigashimoto et al. 2011 26 Low BMIBMI <20 kg/m2 6941
Hospitalized COPD (>65 y)NoneYamauchi et al. 2014 21 UnderweightBMI <18.5 kg/m2 263 94031

BMI, body mass index; CKD, chronic kidney disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CT, Chemotherapy; CVD, cardiovascular diseases; HF, heart failure; NSCLC, non‐small cell lung cancer.

Epidemiologic researches suggesting the prevalence of cachexia BMI, body mass index; CKD, chronic kidney disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CT, Chemotherapy; CVD, cardiovascular diseases; HF, heart failure; NSCLC, non‐small cell lung cancer.

Recent cachexia research in Japan

As expected by the lack of epidemiologic data in cachexia, most of observational/interventional studies in Japan have been based on various definitions for cachexia. Table 2 shows observational/interventional parallel‐group comparison studies using some clear definitions for cachexia. There are wide difference among studies in the definition of cachexia, although some of them have taken weight loss into account as part of the definition.27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 Four interventional studies using ghrelin and octanoic acid‐rich formula have been reported in the field of COPD, including two studies with weight loss >7.5% over 6 months32, 33 and 2 studies with BMI <21 kg/m2 34, 35 as the definition of cachexia. On the other hand, there is no published interventional research targeting cachexia in cancer, heart failure, and CKD. Most of the studies in cancer and heart failure focused on blood levels of hormones or cytokines in those with and without cachexia, but used definitions for cachexia that are completely different from each other. Two of them did not include body weight, but only included cancer stage36 or blood markers37 as definitions of cachexia. The other studies in cancer had an endpoint of weight loss and inflammatory responses38, 39 without any definition of cachexia. The reasons for such a wide variety of inclusion criteria are not clear, but it could be speculated that the researchers intended to simplify the enrollment of patients.40 Although the number of clinical trials targeting cachexia is very limited in Japan so far, researchers may have a potential to produce more evidence in this field, having fruitful results as their background especially in the field of basic research.41 Further studies targeting cachexia patients defined by universal criteria are desirable when we consider to apply the results for Western countries.
Table 2

Observational and interventional studies for cachexia and definitions

DiseaseClassificationReferenceDefinition of cachexiaStudy endpointsType of study N
CancerColorectal and gastric cancerShibata et al. 2002 27 Recurrence or metastasis and >5% weight loss over 3 months or alb <3.0 g/dLThe production of cytokines by peripheral blood mononuclear cellsObservational61
Lung cancerShimizu et al. 2003 28 Weight loss >5% over 3 monthPlasma ghrelin levelsObservational43
Gastric cancerTakahashi et al. 2009 36 Stage IV, subjective symptomsPlasma ghrelin and leptin levelsObservational16
Any cancersNaito et al. 2012 37 GPS as a continuous scaleOxycodone metabolismObservational47
Pancreatic cancerFujiwara et al. 2014 29 Performance Status >0, anorexia, and weight loss >10% over 6 monthsSerum metabolite levelsObservational21
Any cancersSuno et al. 2015 30 Weight loss >5% over 6 month or >2% in patients with a BMI <20 kg/m2 or with sarcopeniaDose‐adjusted plasma fentanyl concentrationsObservational21
Chronic HFStable HFNagaya et al. 2001 31 Weight loss >7.5% over 6 monthPlasma levels of ghrelin and other cytokinesObservational74
COPDCOPDAshitani et al. 200932 Weight loss >7.5% over 6 month or BMI <21 kg/m2 The effect of an octanoic acid‐rich formula on plasma acyl‐ghrelin levelsInterventional23
COPDNagaya et al. 2005 33 Weight loss >7.5% over 6 monthThe effects of ghrelin on body composition, muscle strength, and functional capacityInterventional7
COPDMiki et al. 2012 34 BMI <21 kg/m2 The efficacy and safety of adding ghelin to pulmonary rehabilitationInterventional33
COPDMatsumoto et al. 2015 35 BMI <21 kg/m2 The optimal dose of ghrelinInterventional44

BMI, body mass index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases; GPS, the glasgow Prognostic Score; calculated using serum albumin and C reacting protein, HF; heart failure.

Observational and interventional studies for cachexia and definitions BMI, body mass index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases; GPS, the glasgow Prognostic Score; calculated using serum albumin and C reacting protein, HF; heart failure.

Conclusions

In recent years, many epidemiological data have been updated reporting the distribution of BMI in chronic diseases in Japan, however, most of them have not referred to the definition of cachexia. The clinical course and background of cachectic patients in Japan may be different from that of patients in Western countries. There have been several observational studies comparing patients with and without cachexia, but the definitions of cachexia used have widely varied among studies. Interventional clinical trials for cachectic patients are still lacking especially in cancer, heart failure, and CKD. Further studies are needed to assess the epidemiologic/pathological background, as well as the effect of therapeutic approach, in cachexia.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.
  41 in total

Review 1.  Global trend in overweight and obesity and its association with cardiovascular disease incidence.

Authors:  Hiroshi Yatsuya; Yuanying Li; Esayas Haregot Hilawe; Atsuhiko Ota; Chaochen Wang; Chifa Chiang; Yan Zhang; Mayu Uemura; Ayaka Osako; Yukio Ozaki; Atsuko Aoyama
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 2.993

2.  Impact of cachexia on pharmacokinetic disposition of and clinical responses to oxycodone in cancer patients.

Authors:  Takafumi Naito; Masaki Tashiro; Keisuke Yamamoto; Kazunori Ohnishi; Yoshiyuki Kagawa; Junichi Kawakami
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Elevated circulating level of ghrelin in cachexia associated with chronic heart failure: relationships between ghrelin and anabolic/catabolic factors.

Authors:  N Nagaya; M Uematsu; M Kojima; Y Date; M Nakazato; H Okumura; H Hosoda; W Shimizu; M Yamagishi; H Oya; H Koh; C Yutani; K Kangawa
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-10-23       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Cachexia as a major underestimated and unmet medical need: facts and numbers.

Authors:  Stephan von Haehling; Stefan D Anker
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 12.910

5.  Metabolomics evaluation of serum markers for cachexia and their intra-day variation in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Yutaka Fujiwara; Takashi Kobayashi; Naoko Chayahara; Yoshinori Imamura; Masanori Toyoda; Naomi Kiyota; Toru Mukohara; Shin Nishiumi; Takeshi Azuma; Masaru Yoshida; Hironobu Minami
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Paradoxical association between body mass index and in-hospital mortality in elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Japan.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Yamauchi; Wakae Hasegawa; Hideo Yasunaga; Mitsuhiro Sunohara; Taisuke Jo; Kazutaka Takami; Hiroki Matsui; Kiyohide Fushimi; Takahide Nagase
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2014-12-09

7.  Effect of octanoic acid-rich formula on plasma ghrelin levels in cachectic patients with chronic respiratory disease.

Authors:  Jun-Ichi Ashitani; Nobuhiro Matsumoto; Masamitsu Nakazato
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 3.271

8.  Ghrelin treatment of cachectic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Keisuke Miki; Ryoji Maekura; Noritoshi Nagaya; Masamitsu Nakazato; Hiroshi Kimura; Shinsuke Murakami; Shunsuke Ohnishi; Toru Hiraga; Mari Miki; Seigo Kitada; Kenji Yoshimura; Yoshitaka Tateishi; Yasuji Arimura; Nobuhiro Matsumoto; Masanori Yoshikawa; Kenichi Yamahara; Kenji Kangawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Cachexia as a major public health problem: frequent, costly, and deadly.

Authors:  Jerneja Farkas; Stephan von Haehling; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; John E Morley; Stefan D Anker; Mitja Lainscak
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 12.910

10.  Highlights from the 7th Cachexia Conference: muscle wasting pathophysiological detection and novel treatment strategies.

Authors:  Nicole Ebner; Lisa Steinbeck; Wolfram Doehner; Stefan D Anker; Stephan von Haehling
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 12.910

View more
  9 in total

1.  A cross-sectional study examining the prevalence of cachexia and areas of unmet need in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Ola Magne Vagnildhaug; Trude Rakel Balstad; Sigrun Saur Almberg; Cinzia Brunelli; Anne Kari Knudsen; Stein Kaasa; Morten Thronæs; Barry Laird; Tora Skeidsvoll Solheim
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Publication trends in cachexia and sarcopenia in elderly heart failure patients.

Authors:  Jochen Springer; Stefan D Anker
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  Ethical guidelines for publishing in the journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle: update 2017.

Authors:  Stephan von Haehling; John E Morley; Andrew J S Coats; Stefan D Anker
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 12.910

Review 4.  Skeletal muscle wasting in chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Suzuki; Sandra Palus; Jochen Springer
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2018-12-07

5.  Contemporary publication patterns in the Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle by type and sub-speciality: facts and numbers.

Authors:  Louise G Shewan
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 12.910

6.  A multicenter, open-label, single-arm study of anamorelin (ONO-7643) in advanced gastrointestinal cancer patients with cancer cachexia.

Authors:  Satoshi Hamauchi; Junji Furuse; Toshimi Takano; Yoshinori Munemoto; Ken Furuya; Hideo Baba; Manabu Takeuchi; Yasuhiro Choda; Takashi Higashiguchi; Tateaki Naito; Kei Muro; Koichi Takayama; Shusuke Oyama; Toru Takiguchi; Naoyuki Komura; Kazuo Tamura
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Incidence and frequency of cancer cachexia during chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Shuichi Mitsunaga; Eiji Kasamatsu; Koji Machii
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 8.  Muscle wasting and sarcopenia in heart failure and beyond: update 2017.

Authors:  Jochen Springer; Joshua-I Springer; Stefan D Anker
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2017-11

9.  More variety with the Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle: JCSM Clinical Reports and JCSM Rapid Communications have both gone live.

Authors:  Stefan D Anker; Stephan von Haehling; Andrew J S Coats
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 12.910

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.