Literature DB >> 23539127

Cachexia as a major public health problem: frequent, costly, and deadly.

Jerneja Farkas1, Stephan von Haehling, Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh, John E Morley, Stefan D Anker, Mitja Lainscak.   

Abstract

Perception of healthy body size and composition differs considerably across the globe, ethnic groups, cultures, and even inside medical community. Although the concept of ideal body weight has evolved over the past decades, the observation that weight loss can have more deleterious effects within a short-term period than weight gain has remained rather consistent. Weight loss, as a prelude to cachexia, occurs frequently in a variety of disease states and meets the requirements of a global public health problem. Consequently, interventions to prevent and control chronic diseases require a comprehensive approach that targets a population as a whole and includes both prevention and treatment strategies. Around the globe, cachexia awareness campaigns and expanding the current public health priorities to highlight the cachexia magnitude and areas of interventions is necessary. Simultaneously, scientific efforts should provide us with more reliable estimates of body wasting and cachexia as well as pathophysiology of cachexia-associated death. As certain proportion of patients will, irrespective of preventive measures, eventually develop cachexia, a quest for effective remedy remains vital.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23539127      PMCID: PMC3774921          DOI: 10.1007/s13539-013-0105-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle        ISSN: 2190-5991            Impact factor:   12.910


Introduction

Perception of healthy body size and composition differs considerably across the globe, ethnic groups, cultures, and even inside medical community. During lifetime, most individuals experience weight reduction due to many reasons. The world is primarily aware of malnutrition consequences. These clearly represent a major health problem worldwide with over a billion persons, mostly women and children, suffering from hunger. More persons die from hunger each year than AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis combined. However, in the developed world and much of the developing world disease-related weight loss, which is assuming epidemic proportions, is frequently ignored. Body wasting and cachexia, however, can develop in a variety of acute and chronic conditions to be associated with grim outcome [1, 2]. These include infectious diseases, such as HIV/AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis, as well as many chronic conditions like cancer, chronic heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), cystic fibrosis, liver cirrhosis, Crohn’s disease, rheumatoid arthritis, stroke, and neurological degenerative disease [3-5]. Cachexia has also been noted in patients after extensive traumatic injury and sepsis [1, 2]. The prevalence of an illness or condition is defined as the number of individuals who have the condition at any moment [6]. Exact prevalence of cachexia-associated conditions is essential to assess cachexia prevalence. Table 1 summarizes the prevalence of various conditions from World Health Organization (WHO) regions [6]. Several relevant diseases that can lead to cachexia are not included in this report thus worldwide estimation of cachexia burden remains inconclusive [1, 7]. We therefore often have to rely on fragmented data from individual countries [8, 9] or on several studies focusing on various conditions [1] (Table 2). Unfortunately, the estimate is only as good as the available data. Across the existing literature, several definitions and different populations have been evaluated. With recent cachexia definition [10] from the Cachexia Consensus Working Group at hand (Fig. 1), more reliable data about cachexia should be available in the next years [11]. With new data at hand, past estimates may need adjustment and prevalence of cachexia is likely to increase [1].
Table 1

Prevalence (in millions) of selected conditions by World Health Organization region, 2004

Condition (millions)WorldEuropeAfricaAmericasSouth-East AsiaWestern PacificEastern Mediterranean
Tuberculosis13.90.63.00.55.03.81.1
HIV infection31.42.021.72.83.31.00.5
Stroke survivors30.79.61.64.84.59.11.1
COPD63.611.31.513.213.920.23.3
Rheumatoid arthritis23.76.21.24.64.46.01.3

Modified from [6]

HIV human immunodeficiency virus, COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Table 2

Prevalence (in percent) of cachexia in some diseases

DiseasePrevalence (%)
Cancer28–57
Chronic heart failure16–42
Chronic kidney disease30–60
COPD27–35
Rheumatoid arthritis18–67
HIV/AIDS10–35

Modified from [1, 8]

COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, HIV/AIDS human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

Fig. 1

Cachexia definition from the Cachexia Consensus Working Group. Modified from [10]

Prevalence (in millions) of selected conditions by World Health Organization region, 2004 Modified from [6] HIV human immunodeficiency virus, COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Prevalence (in percent) of cachexia in some diseases Modified from [1, 8] COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, HIV/AIDS human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome Cachexia definition from the Cachexia Consensus Working Group. Modified from [10]

Epidemiological considerations

Misconceptions about cachexia, even in medical and scientific community, are many. Terms as “cachexia,” “malnutrition,” “anorexia,” and “sarcopenia” are frequently used as synonyms although they relate to completely different conditions [4]. With regard to topic of this article, malnutrition needs particular attention. It is frequent around the world and represents a major issue for developing countries and community as a whole. However, it can be reversed by simple refeeding whereas such a strategy alone is ineffective in cachexia. On the other hand, in developing countries malnutrition is, if present sufficiently long and particularly in combination with rheumatic heart disease or Chagas disease, a major contributor to CHF and increased risk to develop cachexia [2]. A recent estimate suggests that approximately nine million patients have cachexia of chronic disease, with the highest prevalence (currently about 1 %) being recorded in North America, Europe, and Japan [1]. Given the population size in Asia, it is very likely that the worldwide burden of cachexia will continue to escalate. The data for Africa and South America are scarce, although reports on cardiovascular disease [12-14] suggest that epidemiological transition has broadened the spectrum of cachexia aetiology in these regions. Different figures have been reported for prevalence of cachexia in individual conditions; yet, common belief is that patients with advanced conditions, particularly cancer, are more prone to develop cachexia (Table 2). In terms of absolute numbers, conditions with high population burden like COPD and CHF cachexia take the lead. Cachexia increases mortality in chronic disease and is present in about 30 % of patients that die. Annual mortality rates are disease dependent: COPD, 10–15 % and CHF or CKD, 20–30 % [1]. An exponential increase to 80 % in cancer translates to two million cancer-related cachexia deaths, i.e., about every second patient with malignant disease will die with some degree of cachexia [15]. From this point of view, cachexia is not merely a complex syndrome that occurs in advanced stages of various chronic diseases but one of the major killers worldwide.

Is cachexia a public health problem?

The ultimate goal of public health has always been and remains the prevention of disease and the promotion of health in communities [16]. In contrast to clinical medicine, public health addresses population groups rather than single individuals and acts through comprehensive and multisectoral interventions. Whereas target diseases and risk factors are largely shared with clinical medicine, public health aims to prevent development of clinically relevant or even full-blown disease to reduce the burden for population and healthcare system. Although no mandatory definition of public health problem is accepted, some general guidance is adopted in the scientific community. For a health condition to be considered as a public health problem, at least four characteristics should be present (Fig. 2). Firstly, the condition burden is high in terms of morbidity, mortality, quality of life, and costs. Secondly, the problem is distributed unfairly, affecting disadvantaged population groups to a greater extent. Thirdly, there must be some evidence that public health strategies could substantially reduce the burden of the condition. Lastly, such preventive strategies are not yet fully in place [17, 18]. Next to the epidemiological and causation background [19], maybe the most important requirement should be the feasibility of relatively simple and cost-effective population-wide strategies to reverse the natural course of the condition [20].
Fig. 2

Characteristics of a public health problem

Characteristics of a public health problem Although many people still believe that chronic diseases are problems of developed communities who have acquired them primarily through indulging in four preventable behaviors (insufficient physical activity, tobacco use, unhealthy diet, and the harmful use of alcohol) [21], the situation around the globe has already started to change [12, 20, 22, 23]. Based on the latest WHO Global Status Report on Non-communicable Diseases, it is estimated that out of 57 million global deaths in 2008, 36 million (63 %) were due to chronic diseases, principally cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, cancers, and chronic respiratory diseases [20]. Nearly 80 % (29 million) of chronic disease deaths occur in the developing world: about 80 % of cardiovascular and diabetes deaths, 90 % of COPD deaths, and about two thirds of cancer deaths. Importantly, in low- and middle-income countries deaths from chronic diseases occur at younger age that hampers social and economic development [20, 24]. As chronic diseases have already started to dominate global public health [24], low- and middle-income countries are facing a double burden of disease. While they continue to deal with the problems of infectious diseases, they are experiencing a rapid upsurge in chronic disease risk factors and deaths, especially in urban settings [25]. Over last decades, we have witnessed dramatic changes in eating, drinking, and moving habits around the globe. Generally, these now clash with our biology and physiology to cause major shifts in body size and composition [26]. The body mass index had a constant trend of increase by 0.4 kg/m2 per decade thus doubling the worldwide obesity and overweight prevalence from 1980 to 2008 [27, 28]. Importantly, this increase occurred in an accelerated fashion with half of the rise occurring in 1980 to 2000 and half in only 8 years from 2000 to 2008 [28]. There is some variation in levels and trends [27-29] but generally speaking, the increase is more pronounced in low and middle income countries [30]. Similarly, the prevalence of hypertension is increasing in developing countries with the current prevalence of 16–37 %, and increases of up to 30 % in last decades [31]. This eventually translates into double burden of disease as these countries are facing an epidemic of chronic diseases through increasing prevalence of risk factors [32]. Indeed, the risk factor associated population attributable fractions of fatal coronary heart disease and stroke indicate further increase in double burden with the growing potential for wasting and cachexia associated with chronic disease [30]. Taking different projections of global mortality and disease burden into account, the world will experience further shift in the distribution of deaths from younger to older age groups and from infectious to chronic diseases during next decades. Large declines in mortality are projected to occur between 2002 and 2030 for all of the principle communicable, maternal, perinatal, and nutritional causes, with the exception of HIV/AIDS. The four leading causes of death globally in 2030 will be ischemic heart disease, stroke, COPD and HIV/AIDS [33]. Based on epidemiological data and public health problem characteristics, we are proponents of qualifying cachexia as a global public health problem. This should in our opinion increase the awareness about cachexia and help the community to comprehend its complexity and magnitude.

Management strategies

Cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, and chronic respiratory diseases are both most prevalent and largely preventable conditions. Population-wide interventions to prevent chronic disease are feasible at low-cost which gives ample opportunities even in countries with low income levels. Bringing this to a higher level, WHO considers some interventions as “best buys” when immediate actions should be undertaken to produce accelerated results in terms of lives saved, diseases prevented, and heavy costs avoided (Table 3) [20]. For those at high risk or with chronic disease, an alternate approach through individual healthcare interventions is necessary.
Table 3

Examples of “best buys” according to World Health Organization

Population-wide interventionsIndividual healthcare interventions
Bans: on smoking in public places and on tobacco and alcohol advertisingAspirin, statin, and blood pressure-lowering agents for people at high cardiovascular risk
Raising taxes: on tobacco and alcoholAdministration of aspirin to people who develop a myocardial infarction
Raising public awareness: about diet and physical activityBlood pressure, glycemic control, and foot care for patients with diabetes
Vaccination: against hepatitis B and human papilloma virus

Modified from [20]

Examples of “best buys” according to World Health Organization Modified from [20] Evidence from high-income countries shows that a focus on both prevention and improved treatment following cardiovascular events led to dramatic declines in mortality rates. Similarly, progress in cancer treatment combined with early detection and screening have improved survival rates for many cancers. As these approaches address risk factors and progression of disease, respectively, population-wide approach has to be complemented by individual healthcare interventions [20]. Effective preventive strategies to tackle socio-economic inequalities, malnutrition, infectious disease, and modern community-related conditions will merely shift the burden towards refractory chronic disease stage with significant potential to increase cachexia burden. Future management, provided that preventive strategies are implemented and successful, will therefore critically depend upon potent remedy against cachexia (not available yet) and supportive measures to meet needs of dependent patients (currently not affordable by any community). In other words, we may experience a transition of cachexia aetiology rather than a story of success. Therefore, a joined perspective of public health practitioners and clinicians about issues dealing with cachexia should be initiated. Meanwhile, intense efforts to find treatment for cachexia should be maintained [34]. To identify suitable patients, a reliable and routine marker reflecting therapeutic target (muscle mass in this case) would be preferred, and creatinine appears as an attractive option [35]. Public and medical community awareness about cachexia should be a primary target for future interventions. This could enhance detection of individuals at risk of or those with body wasting and pre-cachexia. Around the globe, target populations and interventions may differ. Socio-economic inequalities like poverty, level of education, housing and type of occupation are in an independent manner associated with risk factors, disease progression and outcome. As a key and maybe even a rate limiting step in disease’s natural course, they require multisectoral and comprehensive measures, which to a great extent are beyond the scope of medicine alone. Accessibility to healthcare system and basic level of drug availability remain an issue at large. Unmanaged chronic conditions can therefore easily and more quickly develop into full-blown disease and eventually cachexia. After several trials with pharmacological interventions in chronic disease, including the polypill in cardiovascular disease [36], such an approach is promoted over standard public health measures. The jury about this disputed topic, however, is still out and additional research is warranted before accepting such an approach as first line management.

Conclusions and future research

Identifying condition as a public health problem often serves implicit normative or political purposes [19]. Yet, in case of cachexia this is true reflection of epidemiological and clinical circumstances, which has not been acknowledged neither by the community nor by the medical care professionals. We have to perceive the dynamic course of body weight through lifespan where weight loss can have more deleterious effects than weight gain [37, 38]. This should in our opinion increase the awareness about cachexia and help the community to comprehend its complexity and magnitude. Action to prevent and control chronic diseases requires a comprehensive approach that targets a population as a whole and includes both prevention and treatment interventions. It has to be multisectorial with collaboration efforts from government, international organizations, academic institutions, civil society and the private sector [39]. Around the globe, a shift in current public health priorities to highlight the magnitude of the problem and areas of interventions is necessary. Simultaneously, scientific efforts should provide us with more reliable estimates of body wasting and cachexia as well as pathophysiology of cachexia-associated death. As a certain proportion of patients will, irrespective of preventive measures, eventually develop cachexia, a quest for effective remedies remains vital.
  32 in total

Review 1.  The polypill in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases: key concepts, current status, challenges, and future directions.

Authors:  Eva Lonn; Jackie Bosch; Koon K Teo; Prem Pais; Denis Xavier; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Prevention and treatment of cancer cachexia: new insights into an old problem.

Authors:  Maurizio Muscaritoli; Maurizio Bossola; Zaira Aversa; Rocco Bellantone; Filippo Rossi Fanelli
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Cachexia as a major underestimated and unmet medical need: facts and numbers.

Authors:  Stephan von Haehling; Stefan D Anker
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 12.910

Review 4.  Cachexia: prevalence and impact in medicine.

Authors:  Benjamin H L Tan; Kenneth C H Fearon
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.294

5.  Cachexia: common, deadly, with an urgent need for precise definition and new therapies.

Authors:  Mitja Lainscak; Gerasimos S Filippatos; Mihai Gheorghiade; Gregg C Fonarow; Stefan D Anker
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 6.  Cardiac cachexia: a systematic overview.

Authors:  Stephan von Haehling; Mitja Lainscak; Jochen Springer; Stefan D Anker
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 12.310

7.  Predominance of heart failure in the Heart of Soweto Study cohort: emerging challenges for urban African communities.

Authors:  Simon Stewart; David Wilkinson; Craig Hansen; Vinesh Vaghela; Robert Mvungi; John McMurray; Karen Sliwa
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  The ACT-ONE trial, a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study of the anabolic/catabolic transforming agent, MT-102 in subjects with cachexia related to stage III and IV non-small cell lung cancer and colorectal cancer: study design.

Authors:  Andrew J Stewart Coats; Venkatesan Srinivasan; Jayaraman Surendran; Haritha Chiramana; Shankar R K G Vangipuram; Nirajkumar N Bhatt; Minish Jain; Sandip Shah; Irfhan A B H Ali; Ho G Fuang; Mohammed Z M Hassan; John Beadle; Julia Tilson; Bridget-Anne Kirwan; Stefan D Anker
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2011-10-16       Impact factor: 12.910

9.  The obesity paradox in chronic disease: facts and numbers.

Authors:  Mitja Lainscak; Stephan von Haehling; Wolfram Doehner; Stefan D Anker
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 12.910

10.  Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030.

Authors:  Colin D Mathers; Dejan Loncar
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  58 in total

1.  Nutritional status in the elderly: misbeliefs, misconceptions and the real world.

Authors:  Mitja Lainscak; Cristiana Vitale
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  A cross-sectional study examining the prevalence of cachexia and areas of unmet need in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Ola Magne Vagnildhaug; Trude Rakel Balstad; Sigrun Saur Almberg; Cinzia Brunelli; Anne Kari Knudsen; Stein Kaasa; Morten Thronæs; Barry Laird; Tora Skeidsvoll Solheim
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Exercise capacity, physical activity, and morbidity.

Authors:  Danielle L Brunjes; Peter J Kennel; P Christian Schulze
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 4.  Anabolism to Catabolism: Serologic Clues to Nutritional Status in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Laura Murphy; Alastair Gray; Emer Joyce
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2019-10

5.  Ovarian function's role during cancer cachexia progression in the female mouse.

Authors:  Kimbell L Hetzler; Justin P Hardee; Holly A LaVoie; E Angela Murphy; James A Carson
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 4.310

6.  Sex differences in the relationship of IL-6 signaling to cancer cachexia progression.

Authors:  Kimbell L Hetzler; Justin P Hardee; Melissa J Puppa; Aditi A Narsale; Shuichi Sato; J Mark Davis; James A Carson
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2014-12-30

7.  The Effect of Cannabis-Based Medicine in the Treatment of Cachexia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Samuel Hammond; Simon Erridge; Nagina Mangal; Barbara Pacchetti; Mikael H Sodergren
Journal:  Cannabis Cannabinoid Res       Date:  2021-10-18

8.  Why cachexia kills: examining the causality of poor outcomes in wasting conditions.

Authors:  Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Connie Rhee; John J Sim; Peter Stenvinkel; Stefan D Anker; Csaba P Kovesdy
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 12.910

9.  Cachexia in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Risk Factors and Relation to Disease Activity and Damage.

Authors:  George Stojan; Jessica Li; Amaya Wittmaack; Michelle Petri
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 4.794

10.  Pharmacological or genetic inhibition of iNOS prevents cachexia-mediated muscle wasting and its associated metabolism defects.

Authors:  Jason Sadek; Derek T Hall; Bianca Colalillo; Amr Omer; Anne-Marie K Tremblay; Virginie Sanguin-Gendreau; William Muller; Sergio Di Marco; Marco Emilio Bianchi; Imed-Eddine Gallouzi
Journal:  EMBO Mol Med       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 12.137

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.