| Literature DB >> 27237631 |
Islem Ben Bahria-Sediki1,2,3, Nadhir Yousfi1,2, Catherine Paul1,2, Mohamed Chebil4, Mohamed Cherif4, Rachida Zermani4, Amel Ben Ammar El Gaaied3, Ali Bettaieb5,6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical significance of three immune cell-related transcription factors, T-bet, GATA-3 and Bcl-6 in bladder cancer in Tunisian patients.Entities:
Keywords: Bcl-6; Bladder carcinomas; GATA-3; Prognosis; T-bet
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27237631 PMCID: PMC4885121 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-016-0891-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Characteristics of TCC tumor samples and patient information
| Characteristics | Number of patients (n = 65) |
|---|---|
| Mean age (years) | |
| Median | 65.63 |
| Range | 42–107 |
| Gender | |
| Male | (93.85 %) |
| Female | (6.15 %) |
| Tumor stage | |
| Superficial (pta: ptl, TIS) | 39 (60.00 %) |
| Invasive (pt>2) | 25 (38.46 %) |
| Unknown | 1 (1.54 %) |
| Tumor grade | |
| Low-grade (GI) | 24 (37.50 %) |
| Medium-grade (GII) | 8 (12.50 %) |
| High-grade (GIII) | 31 (48.44 %) |
| Unknown | 1 (1.56 %) |
| Bladder cancer recurrence | |
| Recurrence | 28 (49.12 %) |
| No recurrence | 29 (50.88 %) |
| Bladder cancer progression | |
| Progression | 11 (39.29 %) |
| No progression | 17 (60.71 %) |
TCC transitional cell carcinoma
Sequences of primers for RT-PCR
| Target gene | Oligonucleotide sequence (5ʹ→ 3ʹ) |
|---|---|
| L32 | F- CTG CAG TCT CCT TGC ACA CTT |
| R-TCT CCT GAA TGT GGT CAC CTG A | |
| T-bet | F-CCC CTT GGT GTG GAC TGA GA |
| R-ACG CGC CTC CTC TTA GAG TC | |
| GATA-3 | F-GTC CTC CCT GAG CCA CAT CT |
| R-GTG GTC CAA AGG ACA GGC TG | |
| Bcl-6 | F-ACC TGC GAA TCC ACA CAG GA |
| R-AGT CGC AGC TGG CTT TTG TG |
F forward primer, R reverse primer
Fig. 1Kaplan–Meir plots for overall survival (OS) according clinic-pathological feature in patients with primary bladder cancer. Stratified survival curves for 65 patients were evaluated. a Patients with superficial and invasive stage *p = 0.03. b Patients with low and medium- and high- grade tumors *p = 0.01. c Patients with and without recurrence history *p = 0.04. d Patients with and without tumor progression ***p = 0.0002
Fig. 2Relative expression of T-bet in primary tumor biopsies. Histogram showing the expression levels of T-bet according to clinic-pathological features: a Statistical analyses of T-bet expression between superficial and invasive histological stage of bladder cancer *p = 0.02. b Statistical analyses of T-bet expression between low and high histological grade of bladder cancer **p = 0.005. c No correlation of T-bet expression according to recurrence. d No correlation of T-bet expression according to tumor progression. L32 was used as the endogenous reference, and the expression of T-bet target gene in each sample was normalized (as described in “Methods” section). All PCR samples were assessed in triplicate
Fig. 3GATA-3 expression levels according to clinic-pathological features: a Statistical analyses of GATA-3 expression and pathological stage **p = 0.008. b Statistical analyses of GATA-3 expression and pathological grade **p = 0.001. c No correlation between GATA-3 expression and recurrence. d No correlation between GATA-3 expression and tumor progression
Fig. 4Bcl-6 expression levels according to clinic-pathological features: a Statistical analyses of Bcl-6 expression between superficial and invasive histological stages of bladder cancer ***p = 0.0003. b Statistical analyses of Bcl-6 expression between low and high histological grades of bladder cancer ****p < 0.0001. c No correlation between Bcl-6 expression and recurrence. d No correlation between Bcl-6 expression and tumor progression
Fig. 5Kaplan–Meir plots for overall survival (OS) for T-bet, GATA-3, and Bcl-6 gene expression in patients with primary bladder cancer. Stratified survival curves for 65 patients by relative gene expression evaluated by qPCR. A Survival of patients with low and high T-bet expression levels. B Survival of patients with low and high GATA-3 expression levels *p = 0.04. C Survival of patients with low and high Bcl-6 expression levels *p = 0.04
Fig. 6Correlation of T-bet, GATA-3 and Bcl-6 gene expression with response to BCG therapy. Expression of these transcription factors was evaluated by RT-qPCR. a Statistical analyses of GATA-3 expression for poor and good responders to BCG *p = 0.02. b Statistical analyses of Bcl-6 expression for poor and good responders to BCG. c Statistical analyses of T-bet expression for poor and good responders to BCG
Fig. 7Correlation of T-bet, GATA-3 and Bcl-6 expression levels and intensity of tobacco consumption of patients with bladder cancer. a Frequency of smokers’ patients according the BCG response. b Statistical analyses of T-bet expression levels between heavy and light smoker patients. c Statistical analyses of GATA-3 expression levels between heavy and light smokers *p = 0.01. d Statistical analyses of Bcl-6 expression levels between heavy and light smokers *p = 0.03. PY packets per year