CONTEXT: Currently, bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) intravesical instillations are standard treatment for patients with high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer; however, no markers are available to predict BCG response. OBJECTIVE: To review the contemporary literature on markers predicting BCG response, to discuss the key issues concerning the identification of predictive markers, and to provide recommendations for further research studies. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We performed a systematic review of the literature using PubMed and Embase databases in the period 1996-2010. The free-text search was extended by adding the following keywords: recurrence, progression, survival, molecular marker, prognosis, TP53, Ki-67, RB, fibronectin, immunotherapy, cytokine, interleukin, natural killer, macrophage, PMN, polymorphism, SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism, and gene signature. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: If thresholds for the detection of urinary interleukin (IL)-8, IL-18, and tumour necrosis factor apoptosis-inducing ligand levels are standardised, measurement of these cytokines holds promise in the assessment of BCG therapy outcome. Studies on immunohistochemical markers (ie, TP53, Ki-67, and retinoblastoma) display contradictory results, probably because of the small patient groups that were used and seem unsuitable to predict BCG response. Exploring combinations of protein levels might prove to be more helpful to establish the effect of BCG therapy. Single nucleotide polymorphisms, either in cytokines or in genes involved in DNA repair, need to be investigated in different ethnicities before their clinical relevance can be determined. Measurement of urinary IL-2 levels seems to be the most potent marker of all the clinical parameters reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: IL-2 levels are currently the most promising predictive markers of BCG response. For future studies focusing on new biomarkers, it is essential to make more use of new biomedical techniques such as microRNA profiling and genomewide sequencing.
CONTEXT: Currently, bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) intravesical instillations are standard treatment for patients with high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer; however, no markers are available to predict BCG response. OBJECTIVE: To review the contemporary literature on markers predicting BCG response, to discuss the key issues concerning the identification of predictive markers, and to provide recommendations for further research studies. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We performed a systematic review of the literature using PubMed and Embase databases in the period 1996-2010. The free-text search was extended by adding the following keywords: recurrence, progression, survival, molecular marker, prognosis, TP53, Ki-67, RB, fibronectin, immunotherapy, cytokine, interleukin, natural killer, macrophage, PMN, polymorphism, SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism, and gene signature. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: If thresholds for the detection of urinary interleukin (IL)-8, IL-18, and tumour necrosis factor apoptosis-inducing ligand levels are standardised, measurement of these cytokines holds promise in the assessment of BCG therapy outcome. Studies on immunohistochemical markers (ie, TP53, Ki-67, and retinoblastoma) display contradictory results, probably because of the small patient groups that were used and seem unsuitable to predict BCG response. Exploring combinations of protein levels might prove to be more helpful to establish the effect of BCG therapy. Single nucleotide polymorphisms, either in cytokines or in genes involved in DNA repair, need to be investigated in different ethnicities before their clinical relevance can be determined. Measurement of urinary IL-2 levels seems to be the most potent marker of all the clinical parameters reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: IL-2 levels are currently the most promising predictive markers of BCG response. For future studies focusing on new biomarkers, it is essential to make more use of new biomedical techniques such as microRNA profiling and genomewide sequencing.
Authors: Maria Frantzi; Agnieszka Latosinska; Leif Flühe; Marie C Hupe; Elena Critselis; Mario W Kramer; Axel S Merseburger; Harald Mischak; Antonia Vlahou Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2015-05-26 Impact factor: 14.432
Authors: Andrea Slusser-Nore; Scott H Garrett; Xu Dong Zhou; Donald A Sens; Mary Ann Sens; Seema Somji Journal: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol Date: 2017-05-10 Impact factor: 4.219
Authors: Tom J H Arends; Johannes Falke; Rianne J M Lammers; Diederik M Somford; Jan C M Hendriks; Mirjam C A de Weijert; Harm C Arentsen; Antoine G van der Heijden; Egbert Oosterwijk; J Alfred Witjes Journal: World J Urol Date: 2014-12-10 Impact factor: 4.226