| Literature DB >> 27237580 |
Nicole L Stout1, Julie K Silver2, Vishwa S Raj3, Julia Rowland4, Lynn Gerber5, Andrea Cheville6, Kirsten K Ness7, Mary Radomski8, Ralph Nitkin9, Michael D Stubblefield10, G Stephen Morris11, Ana Acevedo12, Zavera Brandon12, Brent Braveman13, Schuyler Cunningham14, Laura Gilchrist15, Lee Jones16, Lynne Padgett17, Timothy Wolf18, Kerri Winters-Stone19, Grace Campbell20, Jennifer Hendricks14, Karen Perkin12, Leighton Chan12.
Abstract
The health care delivery system in the United States is challenged to meet the needs of a growing population of cancer survivors. A pressing need is to optimize overall function and reduce disability in these individuals. Functional impairments and disability affect most patients during and after disease treatment. Rehabilitation health care providers can diagnose and treat patients' physical, psychological, and cognitive impairments in an effort to maintain or restore function, reduce symptom burden, maximize independence and improve quality of life in this medically complex population. However, few care delivery models integrate comprehensive cancer rehabilitation services into the oncology care continuum. The Rehabilitation Medicine Department of the Clinical Center at the National Institutes of Health with support from the National Cancer Institute and the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research convened a subject matter expert group to review current literature and practice patterns, identify opportunities and gaps regarding cancer rehabilitation and its support of oncology care, and make recommendations for future efforts that promote quality cancer rehabilitation care. The recommendations suggest stronger efforts toward integrating cancer rehabilitation care models into oncology care from the point of diagnosis, incorporating evidence-based rehabilitation clinical assessment tools, and including rehabilitation professionals in shared decision-making in order to provide comprehensive cancer care and maximize the functional capabilities of cancer survivors. These recommendations aim to enable future collaborations among a variety of stakeholders to improve the delivery of high-quality cancer care.Entities:
Keywords: Morbidity; Neoplasms; Recovery of function; Rehabilitation; Secondary prevention
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27237580 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.05.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil ISSN: 0003-9993 Impact factor: 3.966