Literature DB >> 27237580

Toward a National Initiative in Cancer Rehabilitation: Recommendations From a Subject Matter Expert Group.

Nicole L Stout1, Julie K Silver2, Vishwa S Raj3, Julia Rowland4, Lynn Gerber5, Andrea Cheville6, Kirsten K Ness7, Mary Radomski8, Ralph Nitkin9, Michael D Stubblefield10, G Stephen Morris11, Ana Acevedo12, Zavera Brandon12, Brent Braveman13, Schuyler Cunningham14, Laura Gilchrist15, Lee Jones16, Lynne Padgett17, Timothy Wolf18, Kerri Winters-Stone19, Grace Campbell20, Jennifer Hendricks14, Karen Perkin12, Leighton Chan12.   

Abstract

The health care delivery system in the United States is challenged to meet the needs of a growing population of cancer survivors. A pressing need is to optimize overall function and reduce disability in these individuals. Functional impairments and disability affect most patients during and after disease treatment. Rehabilitation health care providers can diagnose and treat patients' physical, psychological, and cognitive impairments in an effort to maintain or restore function, reduce symptom burden, maximize independence and improve quality of life in this medically complex population. However, few care delivery models integrate comprehensive cancer rehabilitation services into the oncology care continuum. The Rehabilitation Medicine Department of the Clinical Center at the National Institutes of Health with support from the National Cancer Institute and the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research convened a subject matter expert group to review current literature and practice patterns, identify opportunities and gaps regarding cancer rehabilitation and its support of oncology care, and make recommendations for future efforts that promote quality cancer rehabilitation care. The recommendations suggest stronger efforts toward integrating cancer rehabilitation care models into oncology care from the point of diagnosis, incorporating evidence-based rehabilitation clinical assessment tools, and including rehabilitation professionals in shared decision-making in order to provide comprehensive cancer care and maximize the functional capabilities of cancer survivors. These recommendations aim to enable future collaborations among a variety of stakeholders to improve the delivery of high-quality cancer care.
Copyright © 2016 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Morbidity; Neoplasms; Recovery of function; Rehabilitation; Secondary prevention

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27237580     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  31 in total

1.  Most National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Center Websites Do Not Provide Survivors with Information About Cancer Rehabilitation Services.

Authors:  Julie K Silver; Vishwa S Raj; Jack B Fu; Eric M Wisotzky; Sean Robinson Smith; Sasha E Knowlton; Alexander J Silver
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  Making Cancer Rehabilitation Services Work for Cancer Patients: Recommendations for Research and Practice to Improve Employment Outcomes.

Authors:  Catherine M Alfano; Erin E Kent; Lynne S Padgett; Melvin Grimes; Janet S de Moor
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 3.  A Systematic Review of Exercise Systematic Reviews in the Cancer Literature (2005-2017).

Authors:  Nicole L Stout; Jennifer Baima; Anne K Swisher; Kerri M Winters-Stone; Judith Welsh
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  Training and Practice Patterns in Cancer Rehabilitation: A Survey of Physiatrists Specializing in Oncology Care.

Authors:  Raman Sharma; Diana Molinares-Mejia; Ashish Khanna; Susan Maltser; Lisa Ruppert; Sarah Wittry; Ryan Murphy; Anne Felicia Ambrose; Julie K Silver
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 5.  A Bibliometric Analysis of the Landscape of Cancer Rehabilitation Research (1992-2016).

Authors:  Nicole L Stout; Catherine M Alfano; Christopher W Belter; Ralph Nitkin; Alison Cernich; Karen Lohmann Siegel; Leighton Chan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Targeted muscle reinnervation in oncologic amputees: Early experience of a novel institutional protocol.

Authors:  John H Alexander; Sumanas W Jordan; Julie M West; Amy Compston; Jennifer Fugitt; J Byers Bowen; Gregory A Dumanian; Raphael Pollock; Joel L Mayerson; Thomas J Scharschmidt; Ian L Valerio
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  Promoting assessment and management of function through navigation: opportunities to bridge oncology and rehabilitation systems of care.

Authors:  Nicole L Stout; Alix Sleight; Denise Pfeiffer; Mary Lou Galantino; Bianca deSouza
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Clinically Integrated Physical Therapist Practice in Cancer Care: A New Comprehensive Approach.

Authors:  Christopher A Barnes; Nicole L Stout; Thomas K Varghese; Cornelia M Ulrich; Daniel R Couriel; Catherine J Lee; Christopher S Noren; Paul C LaStayo
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2020-03-10

9.  Bridging the gap: a pre-post feasibility study of embedding exercise therapy into a co-located cancer unit.

Authors:  Amy M Dennett; Bernadette Zappa; Rachel Wong; Stephen B Ting; Kimberley Williams; Casey L Peiris
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  A systematic review of rehabilitation and exercise recommendations in oncology guidelines.

Authors:  Nicole L Stout; Daniel Santa Mina; Kathleen D Lyons; Karen Robb; Julie K Silver
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 508.702

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.