Literature DB >> 32043139

Clinically Integrated Physical Therapist Practice in Cancer Care: A New Comprehensive Approach.

Christopher A Barnes1, Nicole L Stout2,3, Thomas K Varghese4, Cornelia M Ulrich5, Daniel R Couriel6, Catherine J Lee6, Christopher S Noren7, Paul C LaStayo8.   

Abstract

Best practice recommendations in cancer care increasingly call for integrated rehabilitation services to address physical impairments and disability. These recommendations have languished primarily due to a lack of pragmatic, generalizable intervention models. This perspective paper proposes a clinically integrated physical therapist (CI-PT) model that enables flexible and scalable services for screening, triage, and intervention addressing functional mobility. The model is based on (1) a CI-PT embedded in cancer care provider clinics, and (2) rehabilitation across the care continuum determined by the patient's level of functional mobility. The CI-PT model includes regular screening of functional mobility in provider clinics via a patient-reported mobility measure-the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care, a brief physical therapy evaluation tailored to the specific functional needs of the individual-and a tailored, skilled physical therapist intervention based on functional level. The CI-PT model provides a pragmatic, barrier-free, patient-centric, data-driven approach to integrating rehabilitation as part of standard care for survivors of cancer. The model standardizes CI-PT practice and may be sufficiently agile to provide targeted interventions in widely varying cancer settings and populations. Therefore, it may be ideal for wide implementation among outpatient oncological settings. Implementation of this model requires a shared approach to care that includes physical therapists, rehabilitation administrators, cancer care providers, and cancer center administrators.
© 2020 American Physical Therapy Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32043139      PMCID: PMC8204882          DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzz169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  33 in total

Review 1.  Early recognition of malnutrition and cachexia in the cancer patient: a position paper of a European School of Oncology Task Force.

Authors:  M Aapro; J Arends; F Bozzetti; K Fearon; S M Grunberg; J Herrstedt; J Hopkinson; N Jacquelin-Ravel; A Jatoi; S Kaasa; F Strasser
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 2.  The Case for Prehabilitation Prior to Breast Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Daniel Santa Mina; Priya Brahmbhatt; Christian Lopez; Jennifer Baima; Chelsia Gillis; Lianne Trachtenberg; Julie K Silver
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 3.  A Bibliometric Analysis of the Landscape of Cancer Rehabilitation Research (1992-2016).

Authors:  Nicole L Stout; Catherine M Alfano; Christopher W Belter; Ralph Nitkin; Alison Cernich; Karen Lohmann Siegel; Leighton Chan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Impairment-driven cancer rehabilitation: an essential component of quality care and survivorship.

Authors:  Julie K Silver; Jennifer Baima; R Samuel Mayer
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 5.  Survival prediction in terminal cancer patients: a systematic review of the medical literature.

Authors:  A Viganò; M Dorgan; J Buckingham; E Bruera; M E Suarez-Almazor
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.762

Review 6.  A prospective surveillance model for rehabilitation for women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Nicole L Stout; Jill M Binkley; Kathryn H Schmitz; Kimberly Andrews; Sandra C Hayes; Kristin L Campbell; Margaret L McNeely; Peter W Soballe; Ann M Berger; Andrea L Cheville; Carol Fabian; Lynn H Gerber; Susan R Harris; Karin Johansson; Andrea L Pusic; Robert G Prosnitz; Robert A Smith
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  The detection and treatment of cancer-related functional problems in an outpatient setting.

Authors:  A L Cheville; L A Beck; T L Petersen; R S Marks; G L Gamble
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Symptom burden and comorbidities impact the consistency of responses on patient-reported functional outcomes.

Authors:  Andrea Lynne Cheville; Jeffrey Rogers Basford; Katiuska Dos Santos; Kurt Kroenke
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  PROMIS measures can be used to assess symptoms and function in long-term hematopoietic cell transplantation survivors.

Authors:  Bronwen E Shaw; Karen L Syrjala; Lynn E Onstad; Eric J Chow; Mary E Flowers; Heather Jim; K Scott Baker; Sarah Buckley; Diane L Fairclough; Mary M Horowitz; Stephanie J Lee
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Barriers to rehabilitation of the neurosurgical spine cancer patient.

Authors:  Michael D Stubblefield; Mark H Bilsky
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-04-01       Impact factor: 3.454

View more
  1 in total

1.  A systematic review of rehabilitation and exercise recommendations in oncology guidelines.

Authors:  Nicole L Stout; Daniel Santa Mina; Kathleen D Lyons; Karen Robb; Julie K Silver
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 508.702

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.