Literature DB >> 27235797

Developmental validation of STRmix™, expert software for the interpretation of forensic DNA profiles.

Jo-Anne Bright1, Duncan Taylor2, Catherine McGovern3, Stuart Cooper3, Laura Russell3, Damien Abarno4, John Buckleton3.   

Abstract

In 2015 the Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods published the SWGDAM Guidelines for the Validation of Probabilistic Genotyping Systems [1]. STRmix™ is probabilistic genotyping software that employs a continuous model of DNA profile interpretation. This paper describes the developmental validation activities of STRmix™ following the SWGDAM guidelines. It addresses the underlying scientific principles, and the performance of the models with respect to sensitivity, specificity and precision and results of interpretation of casework type samples. This work demonstrates that STRmix™ is suitable for its intended use for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Continuous method; DNA mixtures; Probabilistic genotyping; STRmix; Validation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27235797     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  15 in total

1.  A response to "Likelihood ratio as weight of evidence: A closer look" by Lund and Iyer.

Authors:  Simone Gittelson; Charles E H Berger; Graham Jackson; Ian W Evett; Christophe Champod; Bernard Robertson; James M Curran; Duncan Taylor; Bruce S Weir; Michael D Coble; John S Buckleton
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Massively parallel sequencing-enabled mixture analysis of mitochondrial DNA samples.

Authors:  Jennifer D Churchill; Monika Stoljarova; Jonathan L King; Bruce Budowle
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Simplification of complex DNA profiles using front end cell separation and probabilistic modeling.

Authors:  Nancy A Stokes; Cristina E Stanciu; Emily R Brocato; Christopher J Ehrhardt; Susan A Greenspoon
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 4.882

4.  Enhanced mixture interpretation with macrohaplotypes based on long-read DNA sequencing.

Authors:  Jianye Ge; Jonathan King; Sammed Mandape; Bruce Budowle
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  MaSTR™: an effective probabilistic genotyping tool for interpretation of STR mixtures associated with differentially degraded DNA.

Authors:  Mitchell M Holland; Teresa M Tiedge; Abigail J Bender; Sidney A Gaston-Sanchez; Jennifer A McElhoe
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  Mitochondrial genome sequencing with short overlapping amplicons on MiSeq FGx system.

Authors:  Yang Xin; Rulin Jia; Suhua Zhang; Fei Guo
Journal:  Forensic Sci Res       Date:  2021-12-23

7.  Development and validation of open-source software for DNA mixture interpretation based on a quantitative continuous model.

Authors:  Sho Manabe; Chie Morimoto; Yuya Hamano; Shuntaro Fujimoto; Keiji Tamaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A 124-plex Microhaplotype Panel Based on Next-generation Sequencing Developed for Forensic Applications.

Authors:  Jing-Bo Pang; Min Rao; Qing-Feng Chen; An-Quan Ji; Chi Zhang; Ke-Lai Kang; Hao Wu; Jian Ye; Sheng-Jie Nie; Le Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  An integrated system for forensic DNA testing of sexual assault cases in the Philippines.

Authors:  Jae Joseph Russell B Rodriguez; Rita P Laude; Maria Corazon A De Ungria
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 10.  Interpol review of forensic biology and forensic DNA typing 2016-2019.

Authors:  John M Butler; Sheila Willis
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 2.395

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.