Literature DB >> 30662238

Complications following allograft reconstruction for primary bone tumors: Considerations for management.

Joseph A Ippolito1, Maximilian Martinez1, Jennifer E Thomson1, Alexander R Willis1, Kathleen S Beebe1, Francis R Patterson1, Joseph Benevenia1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate complication rates and types following allograft reconstruction and discuss unique considerations for management.
METHODS: Seventy-four consecutive patients underwent large segment allograft reconstruction following resection of primary musculoskeletal tumors from 1991 to 2016. Mean patient age was 32 ± 20 years (range, 5-71 years). Minimum follow-up was 2 years unless patients were lost to disease prior. Mean follow-up was 105 months.
RESULTS: Thirty-five patients had complications requiring subsequent surgery at a mean of 30 months (range, 1-146 months) post-operatively. Individual complication rates were 29%, 50%, and 42% for Allograft Prosthetic Composite, Intercalary, and Osteoarticular allograft reconstruction, respectively. Risk factors for complication included age less than 30 (OR 4.5; p = 0.002), male gender (OR 2.8; p = 0.031), chemotherapy (OR 4.4; p = 0.003), lower extremity disease (OR 3.4; p = 0.025). In patients with complications, limb-retention rate was 91% and mean MSTS scores were 23.6.
CONCLUSION: Despite considerable complication rates, management with a systematic approach results in successful outcomes with limb-retention greater than 90% and mean MSTS scores of 79%. In carefully selected patients, allografts provide a reliable method of reconstruction with treatable complications occurring at a mean of 30 months.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allograft; Musculoskeletal oncology; Reconstruction

Year:  2018        PMID: 30662238      PMCID: PMC6324760          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.12.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  54 in total

1.  Factors affecting nonunion of the allograft-host junction.

Authors:  F J Hornicek; M C Gebhardt; W W Tomford; J I Sorger; M Zavatta; J P Menzner; H J Mankin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Osteoarticular allograft in surgery for high-grade malignant tumours of bone.

Authors:  R W Rödl; T Ozaki; C Hoffmann; F Böttner; N Lindner; W Winkelmann
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-09

Review 3.  The use of allografts in musculoskeletal oncology.

Authors:  Norbert Dion; Franklin H Sim
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2002

4.  Long-term results of allograft composite total hip prostheses for tumors.

Authors:  F Langlais; J C Lambotte; P Collin; H Thomazeau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Allograft prosthetic composite reconstruction for limb salvage and severe deficiency of bone at the knee or hip.

Authors:  A I Harris; S Gitelis; M B Sheinkop; A G Rosenberg; P Piasecki
Journal:  Semin Arthroplasty       Date:  1994-04

6.  Allograft fractures revisited.

Authors:  J I Sorger; F J Hornicek; M Zavatta; J P Menzner; M C Gebhardt; W W Tomford; H J Mankin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Fractures in large-segment allografts.

Authors:  R C Thompson; A Garg; D R Clohisy; E Y Cheng
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Complications and functional outcomes of reconstruction with an osteoarticular allograft after intra-articular resection of the proximal aspect of the humerus.

Authors:  P J Getty; T D Peabody
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Intercalary femur and tibia segmental allografts provide an acceptable alternative in reconstructing tumor resections.

Authors:  D Luis Muscolo; Miguel A Ayerza; Luis Aponte-Tinao; Maximiliano Ranalletta; Eduardo Abalo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Current status of allografting for bone tumors.

Authors:  H J Mankin; D S Springfield; M C Gebhardt; W W Tomford
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparison of recycled autograft versus allograft in osteosarcoma with pathological fracture.

Authors:  Pai-Han Wang; Chao-Ming Chen; Cheng-Fong Chen; Wei-Ming Chen; Po-Kuei Wu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  A comparative study of autogenous, allograft and artificial bone substitutes on bone regeneration and immunotoxicity in rat femur defect model.

Authors:  Wen Zou; Xing Li; Na Li; Tianwei Guo; Yongfu Cai; Xiaoqin Yang; Jie Liang; Yong Sun; Yujiang Fan
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2020-09-30

3.  Allograft versus autograft for reconstruction after resection of primary bone tumors: a comparative study of long-term clinical outcomes and risk factors for failure of reconstruction.

Authors:  Taweechok Wisanuyotin; Permsak Paholpak; Winai Sirichativapee; Weerachai Kosuwon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Intercalary Reconstruction of the "Ultra-Critical Sized Bone Defect" by 3D-Printed Porous Prosthesis After Resection of Tibial Malignant Tumor.

Authors:  Dingyun Zhao; Fan Tang; Li Min; Minxun Lu; Jie Wang; Yuqi Zhang; Kun Zhao; Yong Zhou; Yi Luo; Chongqi Tu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.989

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.