Literature DB >> 27235308

Genomic Prediction for Quantitative Traits Is Improved by Mapping Variants to Gene Ontology Categories in Drosophila melanogaster.

Stefan M Edwards1, Izel F Sørensen2, Pernille Sarup2, Trudy F C Mackay3, Peter Sørensen4.   

Abstract

Predicting individual quantitative trait phenotypes from high-resolution genomic polymorphism data is important for personalized medicine in humans, plant and animal breeding, and adaptive evolution. However, this is difficult for populations of unrelated individuals when the number of causal variants is low relative to the total number of polymorphisms and causal variants individually have small effects on the traits. We hypothesized that mapping molecular polymorphisms to genomic features such as genes and their gene ontology categories could increase the accuracy of genomic prediction models. We developed a genomic feature best linear unbiased prediction (GFBLUP) model that implements this strategy and applied it to three quantitative traits (startle response, starvation resistance, and chill coma recovery) in the unrelated, sequenced inbred lines of the Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel. Our results indicate that subsetting markers based on genomic features increases the predictive ability relative to the standard genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model. Both models use all markers, but GFBLUP allows differential weighting of the individual genetic marker relationships, whereas GBLUP weighs the genetic marker relationships equally. Simulation studies show that it is possible to further increase the accuracy of genomic prediction for complex traits using this model, provided the genomic features are enriched for causal variants. Our GFBLUP model using prior information on genomic features enriched for causal variants can increase the accuracy of genomic predictions in populations of unrelated individuals and provides a formal statistical framework for leveraging and evaluating information across multiple experimental studies to provide novel insights into the genetic architecture of complex traits.
Copyright © 2016 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila Genetic Reference Population; GenPred; best linear unbiased prediction; chill coma recovery time; genomic feature models; genomic selection; shared data resource; startle response; starvation resistance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27235308      PMCID: PMC4981283          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.116.187161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  46 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms underlying insect chill-coma.

Authors:  Heath A Macmillan; Brent J Sinclair
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.354

2.  The Nature of Genetic Variation for Complex Traits Revealed by GWAS and Regional Heritability Mapping Analyses.

Authors:  Armando Caballero; Albert Tenesa; Peter D Keightley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

4.  The generalisation of student's problems when several different population variances are involved.

Authors:  B L WELCH
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  1947       Impact factor: 2.445

5.  Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers.

Authors:  José Crossa; Gustavo de Los Campos; Paulino Pérez; Daniel Gianola; Juan Burgueño; José Luis Araus; Dan Makumbi; Ravi P Singh; Susanne Dreisigacker; Jianbing Yan; Vivi Arief; Marianne Banziger; Hans-Joachim Braun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genetic architecture of complex traits and accuracy of genomic prediction: coat colour, milk-fat percentage, and type in Holstein cattle as contrasting model traits.

Authors:  Ben J Hayes; Jennie Pryce; Amanda J Chamberlain; Phil J Bowman; Mike E Goddard
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 7.  Estimation and partition of heritability in human populations using whole-genome analysis methods.

Authors:  Anna A E Vinkhuyzen; Naomi R Wray; Jian Yang; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 16.830

8.  A Bayesian variable selection procedure to rank overlapping gene sets.

Authors:  Axel Skarman; Mohammad Shariati; Luc Jans; Li Jiang; Peter Sørensen
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  The Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel.

Authors:  Trudy F C Mackay; Stephen Richards; Eric A Stone; Antonio Barbadilla; Julien F Ayroles; Dianhui Zhu; Sònia Casillas; Yi Han; Michael M Magwire; Julie M Cridland; Mark F Richardson; Robert R H Anholt; Maite Barrón; Crystal Bess; Kerstin Petra Blankenburg; Mary Anna Carbone; David Castellano; Lesley Chaboub; Laura Duncan; Zeke Harris; Mehwish Javaid; Joy Christina Jayaseelan; Shalini N Jhangiani; Katherine W Jordan; Fremiet Lara; Faye Lawrence; Sandra L Lee; Pablo Librado; Raquel S Linheiro; Richard F Lyman; Aaron J Mackey; Mala Munidasa; Donna Marie Muzny; Lynne Nazareth; Irene Newsham; Lora Perales; Ling-Ling Pu; Carson Qu; Miquel Ràmia; Jeffrey G Reid; Stephanie M Rollmann; Julio Rozas; Nehad Saada; Lavanya Turlapati; Kim C Worley; Yuan-Qing Wu; Akihiko Yamamoto; Yiming Zhu; Casey M Bergman; Kevin R Thornton; David Mittelman; Richard A Gibbs
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Genome-wide patterns of latitudinal differentiation among populations of Drosophila melanogaster from North America.

Authors:  Daniel K Fabian; Martin Kapun; Viola Nolte; Robert Kofler; Paul S Schmidt; Christian Schlötterer; Thomas Flatt
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 6.185

View more
  42 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative epigenetics and evolution.

Authors:  Joshua A Banta; Christina L Richards
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Incorporating Gene Annotation into Genomic Prediction of Complex Phenotypes.

Authors:  Ning Gao; Johannes W R Martini; Zhe Zhang; Xiaolong Yuan; Hao Zhang; Henner Simianer; Jiaqi Li
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Genetic Signatures of Drug Response Variability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Palle Duun Rohde; Iben Ravnborg Jensen; Pernille Merete Sarup; Michael Ørsted; Ditte Demontis; Peter Sørensen; Torsten Nygaard Kristensen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Genomic Analysis of Genotype-by-Social Environment Interaction for Drosophila melanogaster Aggressive Behavior.

Authors:  Palle Duun Rohde; Bryn Gaertner; Kirsty Ward; Peter Sørensen; Trudy F C Mackay
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Effects of genetic distance on heterosis in a Drosophila melanogaster model system.

Authors:  Charlotte Jensen; Michael Ørsted; Torsten Nygaard Kristensen
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  The Fate of Deleterious Variants in a Barley Genomic Prediction Population.

Authors:  Thomas J Y Kono; Chaochih Liu; Emily E Vonderharr; Daniel Koenig; Justin C Fay; Kevin P Smith; Peter L Morrell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Covariance Association Test (CVAT) Identifies Genetic Markers Associated with Schizophrenia in Functionally Associated Biological Processes.

Authors:  Palle Duun Rohde; Ditte Demontis; Beatriz Castro Dias Cuyabano; Anders D Børglum; Peter Sørensen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Understanding the potential bias of variance components estimators when using genomic models.

Authors:  Beatriz C D Cuyabano; A Christian Sørensen; Peter Sørensen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Prediction of complex phenotypes using the Drosophila melanogaster metabolome.

Authors:  Palle Duun Rohde; Torsten Nygaard Kristensen; Pernille Sarup; Joaquin Muñoz; Anders Malmendal
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Accelerated deciphering of the genetic architecture of agricultural economic traits in pigs using a low-coverage whole-genome sequencing strategy.

Authors:  Ruifei Yang; Xiaoli Guo; Di Zhu; Cheng Tan; Cheng Bian; Jiangli Ren; Zhuolin Huang; Yiqiang Zhao; Gengyuan Cai; Dewu Liu; Zhenfang Wu; Yuzhe Wang; Ning Li; Xiaoxiang Hu
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 6.524

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.