Literature DB >> 2722943

Morphology of the femur in proximal femoral fractures.

B D Ferris1, C Kennedy, M Bhamra, W Muirhead-Allwood.   

Abstract

We studied the morphology of the contralateral femur in 10 patients with subcapital fractures, 10 with trochanteric fractures and 10 with unilateral osteoarthritis. We found that the patients with trochanteric fractures had a significantly shorter femoral neck (4.5 +/- 0.5 cm) than patients with subcapital fractures or osteoarthritis (5.4 +/- 0.4 cm). It may be that this difference in femoral neck length is related to the site at which a proximal femoral fracture occurs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2722943     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.71B3.2722943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  10 in total

1.  Image resolution and magnification using a cone beam densitometer: optimizing data acquisition for hip morphometric analysis.

Authors:  V Boudousq; D Mariano Goulart; J M Dinten; C Caderas de Kerleau; E Thomas; O Mares; P O Kotzki
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-10-16       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Atypical subtrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures and possible association with bisphosphonates.

Authors:  Jeri W Nieves; Felicia Cosman
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  A comparison of presenting characteristics of patients with intracapsular and extracapsular proximal femoral fractures.

Authors:  M J Parker; G A Pryor; J K Anand; R Lodwick; J W Myles
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Bilateral atypical femoral fractures: how much symmetry is there on imaging?

Authors:  Linda Probyn; Angela M Cheung; Catherine Lang; Leon Lenchik; Jonathan D Adachi; Aliya Khan; Robert G Josse; George Tomlinson; Robert Bleakney
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Can Lateral Offset Be Used as a Predictive Marker for Proximal Femur Disorders?

Authors:  Bilge İpek Torun; Simel Kendir; Ferhat Geneci; Muhammed B Uzuner; Mert Ocak; Burak Bilecenoğlu; Çetin Işık; Kadir Desdicioğlu
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 1.251

6.  Influence of acetabular and femoral version on fractures of the femoral neck.

Authors:  A Frost; G Pavlou; P J Richards; J Belcher; V Jasani
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Fragility fractures of the hip and femur: incidence and patient characteristics.

Authors:  J W Nieves; J P Bilezikian; J M Lane; T A Einhorn; Y Wang; M Steinbuch; F Cosman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Comparison of morphological features in the femur between femoral neck fractures and femoral intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Koun Yamauchi; Mitsuishi Naofumi; Hisashi Sumida; Shoji Fukuta; Hirohiko Hori
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 1.246

9.  Radiographic study on the anatomical characteristics of the proximal femur in Brazilian adults.

Authors:  Tércio Henrique Soares de Farias; Vinícius Quadros Borges; Eduardo Soares de Souza; Natália Miki; Fernando Abdala
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-02-18

10.  Morphometric Evaluation of Korean Femurs by Geometric Computation: Comparisons of the Sex and the Population.

Authors:  Ho-Jung Cho; Dai-Soon Kwak; In-Beom Kim
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.