Literature DB >> 19484169

Fragility fractures of the hip and femur: incidence and patient characteristics.

J W Nieves1, J P Bilezikian, J M Lane, T A Einhorn, Y Wang, M Steinbuch, F Cosman.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: Using national discharge and medical claims data, we studied the epidemiology of femoral fractures from 1996 to 2006. The annual hip fracture incidence declined from 600/100,000 to 400/100,000, without decline in the more rare femur fractures. Incidence rates for subtrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures were each below 20 per 100,000.
INTRODUCTION: This study's purpose is to describe the site-specific epidemiology of femur fractures among people aged 50 and older.
METHODS: Using the National Hospital Discharge Survey from 1996 to 2006 and a large medical claims database (MarketScan), we studied epidemiology of all femur fractures. Hip fractures were grouped together; subtrochanteric, shaft, and distal femur fractures were kept separate.
RESULTS: In females, the overall hospital discharge rates of hip fracture decreased from about 600/100,00 to 400/100,000 person-years from 1996 to 2006. Subtrochanteric, femoral shaft, and lower femur rates remained stable, each approximately 20 per 100,000 person-years. Similar trends but lower rates existed in males. No significant trends were found in any of these fractures during the more recent years of 2002-2006 (MarketScan data). Using MarketScan, the overall incidence of hip fracture was <300/100,000 person-years; incidence of subtrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures combined was <25/100,000 person-years and distal femur fracture incidence was <18/100,000 person-years in females; rates were lower in males. The incidence of hip and other femur fractures increased exponentially with age.
CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence of an increasing incidence of any femoral fracture. Hip fracture incidence is declining but the incidence of each of the more rare femur fractures (distal to the lesser trochanter) is stable over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19484169     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-009-0962-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  26 in total

Review 1.  Are the etiologies of cervical and trochanteric hip fractures different?

Authors:  C A Mautalen; E M Vega; T A Einhorn
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Trends in hospital care for hip fractures.

Authors:  S H Gehlbach; J S Avrunin; E Puleo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Nutritional differences in patients with proximal femoral fractures.

Authors:  N Maffulli; T W Dougall; M T Brown; M H Golden
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 10.668

4.  Morphology of the femur in proximal femoral fractures.

Authors:  B D Ferris; C Kennedy; M Bhamra; W Muirhead-Allwood
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1989-05

5.  Bilateral fractures of the femoral neck.

Authors:  D A Boston
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  Epidemiology of diaphyseal and distal femoral fractures in Rochester, Minnesota, 1965-1984.

Authors:  T J Arneson; L J Melton; D G Lewallen; W M O'Fallon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femur fractures in patients treated with alendronate: a register-based national cohort study.

Authors:  Bo Abrahamsen; Pia Eiken; Richard Eastell
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Classification of trochanteric fracture of the proximal femur: a study of the reliability of current systems.

Authors:  Humayon Pervez; Martyn J Parker; Glyn A Pryor; Lennel Lutchman; Nishan Chirodian
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  Relative rates of fracture of the hip in the United States. Geographic, sex, and age variations.

Authors:  R Y Hinton; D W Lennox; F R Ebert; S J Jacobsen; G S Smith
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 10.  Looking beyond low bone mineral density: multiple insufficiency fractures in a woman with post-menopausal osteoporosis on alendronate therapy.

Authors:  P Lee; H van der Wall; M J Seibel
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.256

View more
  79 in total

Review 1.  Aging and bone.

Authors:  A L Boskey; R Coleman
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 2.  Atypical femoral fractures: epidemiology, etiology, and patient management.

Authors:  Eve Donnelly; Anas Saleh; Aasis Unnanuntana; Joseph M Lane
Journal:  Curr Opin Support Palliat Care       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.302

3.  The incidence of and risk factors for developing atypical femoral fractures in Japan.

Authors:  Yoshitomo Saita; Muneaki Ishijima; Atsuhiko Mogami; Mitsuaki Kubota; Tomonori Baba; Takefumi Kaketa; Masashi Nagao; Yuko Sakamoto; Kensuke Sakai; Yasuhiro Homma; Rui Kato; Nana Nagura; Kei Miyagawa; Tomoki Wada; Lizu Liu; Joe Matsuoka; Osamu Obayashi; Katsuo Shitoto; Masahiko Nozawa; Hajime Kajihara; Hogaku Gen; Kazuo Kaneko
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Treatment of femoral subtrochanteric fractures with proximal lateral femur locking plates.

Authors:  Sun-Jun Hu; Shi-Min Zhang; Guang-Rong Yu
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.513

5.  Changes in femur neck bone density in US adults between 1988-1994 and 2005-2008: demographic patterns and possible determinants.

Authors:  A C Looker; L J Melton; L G Borrud; J A Shepherd
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Potential and pitfalls of using large administrative claims data to study the safety of osteoporosis therapies.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Huifeng Yun; Nicole C Wright; Meredith Kilgore; Kenneth G Saag; Elizabeth Delzell
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 7.  Atypical femoral fractures: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Pingal A Desai; Parth A Vyas; Joseph M Lane
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.096

8.  Unchanging incidence of hip fracture in southeastern norway.

Authors:  Sam Polesie; Ulf Sigurdsen; Kristian Bjørgul
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2013-06

9.  Variation in risk factors for fractures at different sites.

Authors:  Jennifer L Kelsey; Elizabeth J Samelson
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.096

10.  Hip fracture epidemiological trends, outcomes, and risk factors, 1970-2009.

Authors:  Ray Marks
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2010-04-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.