Literature DB >> 27226350

Highly specific targeted mutagenesis in plants using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9.

Hidetaka Kaya1, Masafumi Mikami1,2, Akira Endo1, Masaki Endo1, Seiichi Toki1,2,3.   

Abstract

The CRISPR/Cas9 system is an efficient and convenient tool for genome editing in plants. Cas9 nuclease derived from Streptococcus pyogenes (Sp) is commonly used in this system. Recently, Staphylococcus aureus Cas9 (SaCas9)-mediated genome editing was reported in human cells and Arabidopsis. Because SaCas9 (1053 a.a.) is smaller than SpCas9 (1368 a.a.), SaCas9 could have substantial advantages for delivering and expressing Cas9 protein, especially using virus vectors. Since the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence of SaCas9 (5'-NNGRRT-3') differs from that of SpCas9 (5'-NGG-3'), the use of this alternative Cas9 nuclease could expand the selectivity at potential cleavage target sites of the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Here we show that SaCas9 can mutagenize target sequences in tobacco and rice with efficiencies similar to those of SpCas9. We also analyzed the base preference for 'T' at the 6th position of the SaCas9 PAM. Targeted mutagenesis efficiencies in target sequences with non-canonical PAMs (5'-NNGRRV-3') were much lower than those with a canonical PAM (5'-NNGRRT-3'). The length of target sequence recognized by SaCas9 is one or two nucleotides longer than that recognized by SpCas9. Taken together, our results demonstrate that SaCas9 has higher sequence recognition capacity than SpCas9 and is useful for reducing off-target mutations in crop.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27226350      PMCID: PMC4881040          DOI: 10.1038/srep26871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-associated endonuclease (CRISPR/Cas) system, the feature widely observed in prokaryote genomes, functions as an adaptive immune system by installing short DNA fragments from viruses or plasmids into CRISPR loci using RNA from the CRISPR loci to target specific sequences in invader genomes12. Of the three types of CRISPR/Cas systems, type II has been most intensively studied and developed for genome engineering techniques in eukaryotes, including plants3456789. The type II CRISPR/Cas system is composed of a Cas9 nuclease and a guide RNA (gRNA)1011. The chimeric single gRNA comprises two parts: a scaffold, and a specific DNA target sequence on the 5′ end. The Cas9 nuclease most commonly used in genome editing research to date is derived from Streptococcus pyogenes (Sp)12. SpCas9 mediates genome editing at a site complementary to a 20-nucleotide DNA specific sequence in the gRNA13. Cas9 requires a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) at the 3′ end of the DNA target sequence to recognize and cleave the target DNA14. The PAM sequence for SpCas9 is 5′-NGG-3′15. Several Cas9 protein homologs have been identified and characterized for use in genome editing research16. Each Cas9 protein homolog functions similarly as an RNA-guided endonuclease, with homologs differing in their molecular weights and PAM preferences. Recently, Ran et al. reported that, when different Cas9 homologues were tested in mammalian cells, Staphylococcus aureus Cas9 (SaCas9) exhibited robust activity17. SaCas9 (1053 amino acids) is smaller than SpCas9 (1368 amino acids). The relatively large size of SpCas9 has limited its utility, thus the smaller Cas9 from Staphylococcus aureus might prove useful for therapeutic applications using the versatile adeno-associated virus delivery vehicle17. Unlike SpCas9, SaCas9 requires a 21- or 22-nt DNA specific sequence and the motif 5′-NNGRRT-3′ as a PAM sequence17. To broaden the spectrum of genome editing using the CRISPR/Cas9 system in plants, we need to widen the choice of Cas9 proteins beyond SpCas9. During the preparation of this paper, Steinert et al. reported that SaCas9 could induce mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana18. Here, we show that SaCas9 functions in rice and tobacco. The probability of off-target mutation induced by SaCas9 might be lower than that induced by SpCas9. SaCas9 prefers the canonical PAM for effective targeted mutagenesis. Our results suggest that SaCas9 can direct highly specific genome editing activity, and will be useful for targeted genome editing in crops.

Results

Comparing the efficiencies of SaCas9 and SpCas9 for genome editing in tobacco

A synthetic SpCas9 gene19 and the SaCas9 gene optimized for Arabidopsis thaliana codon usage were expressed to induce mutation in the tobacco genome. Expression of both Cas9 genes was controlled by the Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter (35S) (Fig. 1a). The gRNA, consisting of a sequence specific to the target DNA and a scaffold sequence, was expressed under the control of the U6-26 promoter20 derived from Arabidopsis thaliana. We selected two target genes in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum): the PHYTOENE DESATURASE (NtPDS) gene21 and the NtFT4 gene22. Tobacco is an allotetraploid derived from ancestors of two diploids, Nicotiana tomentosiformis and Nicotiana sylvestris, thus there are two homologous genes for PDS and four homologous genes (FT1–4) for FT in the tobacco genome. The PDS gene encodes a phytoene desaturase involving in carotenoid biosynthesis and disruption of PDS causes albino phenotype resulting from lack of carotenoid derivatives such as chlorophyll23. The NtFT4 gene induces flowering in tobacco, while the other three (NtFT1–3) repress flowering22. To evaluate the genome editing activity of SaCas9 in comparison with that of SpCas9, we selected target sequences of 21 nt and 20 nt, the 3′ end of which have 5′-NNGRRT-3′ and 5′-NGG-3′ as the PAM sequences for SaCas9 and SpCas9, respectively (Table 1). To eliminate position effects on genome editing, the two target sequences (SaCas9 and SpCas9) were designed to be mostly same (Table 1). Transgenic tobacco was produced by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation with the constructs shown in Fig. 1a. The transformed tobacco (T0 generation) was regenerated from leaf disks on kanamycin plates for 4–6 weeks (Supplementary Fig. S1a). Genomic DNA was extracted independently from each regenerated shoot and subjected to cleaved amplified polymorphic sequences (CAPS) analysis to assess the presence or absence of mutations in the target sequences. The genome editing frequency was estimated by determining the ratio of regenerated shoots with mutation to those without mutation. The mutation frequency induced by SaCas9 at the NtPDS and NtFT4 gene loci was 75.6% and 65.1%, respectively (Table 2). These results indicate that SaCas9 can induce targeted mutation in tobacco. The mutation frequency induced by SaCas9 was almost same as that induced by SpCas9 at both loci (Table 2). We examined the patterns of mutation induced by SaCas9 and SpCas9 at the NtPDS gene and NtFT4 gene loci (Fig. 1b,c). SaCas9 most often induced small deletions or small insertions around the PAM sequence (Fig. 1b,c). Some transgenic tobacco plants expressing gPDS_Sa and SaCas9 showed an albino phenotype; plants with this phenotype possessed biallelic mutation in two NtPDS genes (Fig. 1d).
Figure 1

SaCas9 induced mutation in tobacco.

(a) Expression construct for SaCas9 (top) and SpCas9 (bottom) in tobacco. A 3 × FLAG tag and 3 × NLS peptide were translationally fused in tandem to the N-terminus of Cas9. The AtADH 5′-UTR and HSP terminator enhance transcription of the Cas9 gene. NLS: nuclear localization signal. AtADH 5′-UTR: 5′ untranslated region of Arabidopsis thaliana ALCOHOL DEHYDROGENASE gene. HSP-ter: the terminator region of Arabidopsis thaliana HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 18.2 gene. (b,c) Mutations detected in NtPDS (b) and NtFT4 (c) gene loci. The wild-type sequence is shown at the top with the target sequence underlined and the PAM in bold. DNA deletions and insertions are shown in dashes and lower case red letters. The net change in length, and the number of clones are noted to the right of each sequence (+, insertion; −, deletion; ×, number of clones). (t): Genomic DNA derived from N. tomentosiformis, (s): genomic DNA derived from N. sylvestris. (d) Phenotype of pds mutant. Left A regenerated plant with wild-type PDS gene, right a regenerated plant with mutation in all four NtPDS genes. (e) Potential off-target genes for NtFT4. The target sequence of the NtFT4 gene is shown at the top with PAM. The mismatched bases in NtFT1 and NtFT2 genes are shown in blue letters. (f) CAPS analysis of NtFT4 gene locus in the T1 generation. Each T1 progeny was segregated from biallelic mutant (T0) or monoallelic mutant (T0). -: Non-digested PCR products, +: DdeI-digested PCR products. An undigested band indicates mutation in the NtFT4 gene.

Table 1

List of target genes, guide RNAs (gRNA), target sequences and PAM sequences used in this study.

target genegRNAtarget sequencePAMreference
NtFT4gFT4_SaGCCCAAGCAACCCTAACCTGAGGGAGTThis study
 gFT4_SpCCCAAGCAACCCTAACCTGAGGGThis study
NtPDSgPDS_SaTTGCGATGCCTAACAAGCCAGGGGARTThis study
 gPDS_SpTGCGATGCCTAACAAGCCAGGGGThis study
OsDL1gDL-1_SaGTCTTTTGGGTAGCTGCAGGTTGGAGTThis study
 gDL-1_SpTCTTTTGGGTAGCTGCAGGTTGGMikami et al.25
 gDL-2_SaGACTGACCTGAAACGGGCCCAAGGGGTThis study
 gDL-2_SpACTGACCTGAAACGGGCCCAAGGMikami et al.25
OsCYP72A33gCYP72A33_SaCGTACGAGGTGGATTGCTGGCCGGAGTThis study
OsCYP72A32gCYP72A33_SaCGTACGAGGTGGATTGCTGGCCGGAGCThis study
OsVIP1gVIP1_SaTAAGAGGAGCGGGTCGATGGATGGGGTThis study
OsVIP1-likegVIP1_SaTAAGAGGAGCGGGTCGATGGATGGGGAThis study

Differences from canonical PAM “5-NNGRRT-3” for SaCas9 are underlined.

Table 2

Mutation rate of T0 regenerated tobacco plants in the target gene.

target geneCas9No. of plants examinedNo. of plants with mutationsMutation rate (%)
NtPDSSaCas9453475.6
 SpCas9443579.5
NtFT4SaCas9432865.1
 SpCas9221359.1

Analysis of off-target mutations induced by SaCas9

We examined the possibility that SaCas9 induces off-target mutations in tobacco. The NtFT1 and NtFT2 genes have two and four mismatched bases, respectively, in the NtFT4 target sequence (Fig. 1e). No regenerated plants with a mutation in the NtFT1 or NtFT2 gene were detected, suggesting that SaCas9 does not induce mutation in a target sequence that has two mismatched bases in the corresponding gRNA sequence (Table 3).
Table 3

Mutation rate of T0 regenerated tobacco plants with mismatched bases in the target sequence.

target genegRNANo. of mismatched basesCas9No. of examined plantsNo. of plants with mutationsMutation rate (%)
NtFT1gNtFT4_Sa2SaCas93200
NtFT2gNtFT4_Sa4SaCas93200

Heritable targeted mutagenesis using SaCas9

We next examined whether the mutation induced by SaCas9 is inherited by the next generation. Because the pds null mutant is seedling lethal, we analyzed the mutation in the NtFT4 gene. Genomic DNA extracted independently from the T1 progenies of biallelic (T0) and monoallelic (T0) mutant was subjected to CAPS analysis. PCR products that were not digested by restriction enzyme (DdeI) indicated that the mutation had been introduced into NtFT4 gene. All T1 progenies of the T0 biallelic mutant had biallelic mutations induced by SaCas9 in the NtFT4 gene (Fig. 1f). Both biallelic mutants and monoallelic mutants were segregated from the monoallelic mutant in the T1 generation (Fig. 1f). These results indicate that the mutation induced by SaCas9 is inherited to the next generation.

Comparing the efficiency of SaCas9 and SpCas9 for genome editing in rice

The SpCas9 gene24 optimized for rice codon usage was expressed in rice. It has been reported that an Arabidopsis thaliana codon-optimized SpCas9 gene works as well as the Oryza sativa codon-optimized SpCas9 gene in rice25, thus we used Arabidopsis thaliana codon-optimized SaCas9 gene in rice. The expression of both SaCas9 and SpCas9 was controlled by a dual CaMV 35S promoter (2 × 35S) (Fig. 2a). The guide RNA was expressed under the control of the U6-2 promoter derived from Oryza sativa26. We used the DROOPING LEAF (DL) gene for targeted mutagenesis in rice27. The Cas9 gene and gRNA expression vector were both transfected into 1-month-old scutellum-derived rice calli via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Transformed rice calli were selected on hygromycin plates for 3 weeks (Supplementary Fig. S1b). The mutation frequency was estimated in two ways as follows: (1) by measuring the ratio of calli with mutation to those without, and (2) by measuring the ratio of clones with mutation versus total randomly sequenced clones.
Figure 2

SaCas9 induced mutation in rice.

(a) Expression construct for SaCas9 (upper) and SpCas9 (bottom) in rice. A 3 × FLAG tag and 3 × NLS peptide translationally fused in tandem to the N-terminus of SaCas9. A 1 × FLAG tag was translationally fused to the N-terminus of SpCas9. The OsADH 5′-UTR was added to enhance transcription of the Cas9 gene. OsADH 5′-UTR: 5′ untranslated region of Oryza sativa ALCOHOL DEHYDROGENASE gene. Pea 3A-ter: terminator region of Pea RBCS-3A gene, OsACT1-ter: terminator region of OsACTIN1 gene. (b) CAPS analysis of the OsDL gene locus in SaCas9- and SpCas9-expressing calli. Mutation frequency (%) was calculated from the number of clones with mutation versus total number of sequenced clones indicated under the callus number. -: Non-digested PCR products, +: PstI- or ApaI-digested PCR products. (c) Mutations detected in red rectangle in (b). The wild-type sequence is shown at the top with the target sequence underlined and the PAM in bold. DNA deletions and insertions are shown as dashes and lower case red letters. The net change in length and the number of clones are noted to the right of each sequence (+, insertion; −, deletion; ×, number of clones). (d) Phenotype of dl mutant. Left Wild-type plant, right a regenerated plant from calli with mutation in OsDL gene.

In CAPS analysis, PCR products not digested by restriction enzyme indicated that Cas9 had induced a mutation in the target sequence (Fig. 2b). Mutations were detected in all eight calli expressing gDL-1_Sa and SaCas9 (Fig. 2b, upper left). Also, mutations were detected in all calli expressing gDL-1_Sp and SpCas9 (Fig. 2b, upper right). The same results were obtained in gDL-2_Sa- and SaCas9-expressing calli and gDL-2_Sp- and SpCas9-expressing calli (Fig. 2b, lower). We estimated the mutation frequency in independent calli; PCR products derived from independent calli were cloned into plasmids and sequenced. The mutation frequencies of #1 and #2 callus lines expressing gDL-1_Sa and SaCas9 were 87.5% and 93.7%, respectively. The mutation frequency of #2 callus expressing gDL-1_Sp and SpCas9 was 81.2%. The same results were obtained in gDL-2_Sa, SaCas9- and gDL-2_Sp, SpCas9-expressing callus. These results indicate that SaCas9 could induce mutations in rice just as well as SpCas9, and also that the targeted mutagenesis efficiency of SaCas9 is comparable to that of SpCas9. We examined the patterns of mutation in rice calli caused by SaCas9 and SpCas9 (Fig. 2c). Like SpCas9, small deletions or small insertions close to the PAM sequence were found most often in SaCas9-induced mutations, while large deletions (>25 bp) were rarely detected. We examined the genotype and phenotype of rice plants regenerated from transformed calli that express gDL-1_Sa or gDL-2_Sa and SaCas9 (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Fig. S2). The OsDL gene is a member of the YABBY gene family, and the dl mutation causes defects in midrib formation in leaves, resulting in a drooping leaf phenotype28; regenerated rice plants possessing a biallelic mutation in the DL gene exhibited this phenotype.

Base preference for ‘T’ at the 6th position of the SaCas9 PAM in plants

Ran et al. reported that the thymine (T) at the 6th position of the SaCas9 PAM 5′-NNGRRT-3′ is not necessary for genome editing in human cells17. If this is also the case in plants, the selectivity of potential SaCas9 target sequences can be expanded. To explore this possibility, we selected two pairs of target genes (CYP72A33 and OsCYP72A32, and OsVIP1 and OsVIP1-like). Each pair of genes has a perfect-match target sequence differing only at the 6th position of the PAM sequence (Table 1). We applied a heteroduplex mobility assay (HMA) that has been used previously to detect both transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs)-induced mutation29 and CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutation30. Genomic DNA was prepared from individual calli expressing SaCas9 and gCYP72A33_Sa. Each of the PCR products from the CYP72A33 and CYP72A32 gene loci derived from the same genomic DNA was subjected to HMA. The presence of a heteroduplex structure indicates that the targeted mutation has been introduced into the genomic DNA. Heteroduplex structure was detected in the CYP72A33 target sequence that has a ‘T’ at the 6th position of PAM (Fig. 3a upper panel). The number of calli exhibiting the presence of the heteroduplex structure was reduced in the CYP72A32 target sequence, which has a ‘C’ at the 6th position of PAM (Fig. 3a). The frequency of targeted mutagenesis in the CYP72A33 gene was also reduced to 0–4.1% in the CYP72A32 gene. The same results were obtained in the VIP1 gene and VIP1-like gene loci (Fig. 3b). The VIP1 target sequence has a ‘T’ at the 6th position of PAM, while the VIP1-like target sequence has an ‘A’ at this position. We examined the patterns of mutation induced in #4 calli at CYP72A33 and CYP72A32 gene loci (Fig. 3c). We also analyzed the mutation frequency using other target sequences with non-canonical PAM sequences (Table 4). The results suggested that the ‘T’ at the 6th position of PAM is necessary in order for SaCas9 to recognize and cleave the target sequence in plant cells.
Figure 3

Targeted mutagenesis efficiency in target gene with canonical or non-canonical PAM for SaCas9.

(a,b) Heteroduplex mobility assay of SaCas9 expression calli. CYP72A33 and VIP1 target sequences have canonical PAM (5′-NNGRRT-3′) (upper panel). CYP72A32 and VIP1-like target sequences have non-canonical PAM (5′-NNGRRC-3′ and 5′-NNGRRA-3′) (lower panel). (c) Mutations detected in OsCYP72A33 and OsCYP72A32 gene loci. The wild-type sequence is shown at the top with the target sequence underlined and the PAM in bold. DNA deletions and insertions are shown as dashes and lower case red letters. The net change in length and the number of clones are noted to the right of each sequence (+, insertion; −, deletion; ×, number of clones). The asterisk (*) indicates the difference from the canonical PAM for SaCas9.

Table 4

Mutation rate of transformed rice callus in target sequences with non-canonical PAM for SaCas9.

target genegRNAtarget sequencePAMMutation rate (%)
OsDLgDL-3_SaGCCAGCTCCTGAATGTTCATGAGGAAG0
OsALSgALS-2_SaGGACCTTGCACTGACTGCAGGAGGAAC0
OsLIG6gLIG6_SaACGGAGAGCGATTTGGAGTCCGGGGAG0
OsPDSgPDS-1_SaCCGTCCAACCCATTCCTCTGCAGGAGC8.3
OsPOLQgPOLQ-1_SaTGTATATAGCACAGAGCTCAGGGGGAA15.7

Differences from the canonical PAM “5-NNGRRT-3” for SaCas9 are underlined.

Discussion

We compared the efficiency of targeted mutagenesis using SaCas9 and SpCas9 on multiple target sequences in rice and tobacco, and showed that SaCas9 works with comparable efficiency to SpCas9. Utilization of SaCas9, which recognizes 5′-NNGRRT-3′ as PAM, expands the selectivity of targeted mutagenesis sites in dicots and monocots and will be a useful addition to the widely used SpCas9. We used target sequences with three (5′-NNGAGT-3′, 5′-NNGGGT-3′, 5′-NNGAAT-3′) out of four PAM patterns for SaCas9 at their 3′ end to induce mutations in tobacco and rice. No obvious difference in targeted mutagenesis efficiency was found between them. These findings suggest that both G and A at the 4th or 5th position of PAM for SaCas9 are equally suitable for genome editing in plants. The efficiency of targeted mutagenesis with non-canonical PAMs (5′-NNGRRV-3′) is much lower than that with a canonical PAM (5′-NNGRRT-3′) in rice (Fig. 3). Ran et al. showed that 5′-NNGRRN-3′ can work as a PAM for SaCas9 in human cells, but that 5′-NNGRRT-3′ was the most efficient in inducing mutation. Kleinstiver et al. showed using a bacterial-based negative selection system that three PAMs (5′-NNGAGT-3′, 5′-NNGGGT-3′, 5′-NNGAAT-3′) were more functional than other PAMs31. These data are consistent with our experimental data in plant cells. We also recommend that 5′-NNGRRT-3′ be used for SaCas9 PAM in plant cells. Therefore, the sequence 5′-NNGRRT-3′ should be selected as the preferred PAM sequence when designing an efficient targeted mutagenesis strategy in plants using the SaCas9 system. SpCas9 induces off-target mutations, even at the sites that possess five mismatched bases in the corresponding on-target sequence in human cells323334. In rice cells, SpCas9 with gCDKB2, which is targeted to the OsCDKB2 gene, induced off-target mutation in the OsCDKB1 gene, which has two mismatched bases and one of two mismatched bases is located in seed sequence24. NtFT1 gene possesses two mismatched bases at the NtFT4 target sequence for SaCas9, and one mismatched base in the seed sequence (Fig. 1e). However, we detected no mutation in the NtFT1 gene (Table 3). The 21- or 22-nt target sequence for SaCas9 is 1 or 2 nt longer than that of SpCas9, and the PAM for SaCas9 is 2 nt longer than that of SpCas9. We have shown that 5′-NNGRRT-3′ is the preferred PAM for targeted mutagenesis using SaCas9 in plants. These results suggest that the probability of off-target mutation induced by SaCas9 might be lower than that induced by SpCas9. This suggestion is supported by data from Friedland et al.35. Their GUIDE-seq result shows that SaCas9 is more specific than SpCas9 in human cells35.

Methods

Plasmid construction

The Arabidopsis thaliana codon-optimized SaCas9 gene was synthesized by GeneArt Gene Synthesis (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The backbone of the binary vector used in this study was derived from pRI201-AN (TaKaRa, Japan) and pPZP200 for tobacco and rice, respectively. The Cas9 expression vector in tobacco, pRI201-AN was constructed as follows: (1) the Arabidopsis thaliana codon-optimized Cas9 was fused to 3 × FLAG tag (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and 3 × NLS (nuclear localization signal), respectively. (2) CaMV 35S promoter (35S) and the sequences of Arabidopsis thaliana alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) 5′-untranslated region (UTR) were connected upstream of Cas9, and the terminator sequence of Arabidopsis thaliana HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN (HSP) gene was connected downstream of Cas9 (Supplementary Figs S3 and S4). The Cas9 expression vector in rice, pPZP200, was constructed as follows: (1-1) the Arabidopsis thaliana codon-optimized SaCas9 was fused to 3 × FLAG tag and 3 × NLS. (1–2) the Oryza sativa codon-optimized SpCas9 was fused to 1 × NLS. (2) the dual CaMV 35S promoter (2 × 35S) and the sequences of the rice alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) 5′-untranslated region (UTR) were connected upstream of Cas9, and the pea RBCS3A (pea3A) terminator sequence and the sequence of the Oryza sativa ACTIN1 (ACT1) gene 3′-UTR were connected downstream of Cas9 (Supplementary Figs S5 and S6). The guide RNA expression vector was constructed as follows. (1) The sequence of the OsU6 promoter and AtU6, RNA scaffold and poly (T) were synthesized. (2) The synthesized target sequence (21 nt or 20 nt) was cloned into the BbsI site of the single guide RNA expression vector (Supplementary Fig. S7). The PacI-AscI fragment of the single guide RNA expression vector was subcloned into the Cas9 expression binary vector.

Transformation of rice callus

Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Nipponbare) using scutellum-derived calli was performed as described previously3637. Briefly, one-month-cultured rice calli were infected by Agrobacterium (EHA105 strain). After 3 days of co-cultivation, calli were transferred to callus-induction medium containing 50 mg/L hygromycin B (Wako Pure Chemicals, Osaka, Japan) and 25 mg/L meropenem (Wako Pure Chemicals, Japan). Hygromycin-resistant calli were selected over 4 weeks.

Transformation of tobacco

Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Petit Havana SR-1) was transformed via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation as described previously38. Transgenic tobacco plants were regenerated from leaf disks on medium containing 50 mg/L kanamycin (Wako Pure Chemicals, Japan) and 25 mg/L meropenem.

CAPS analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from calli, regenerated rice plants or transgenic tobacco shoots using Agencourt Chloro Pure (BECKMAN COULTER, USA), and target loci were amplified by PCR. PCR products were digested by restriction enzymes.

Heteroduplex mobility assay

Heteroduplex mobility assay (HMA) was applied to detect mutations induced by Cas9 with a microchip electrophoresis system30. PCR products were analyzed using MCE-202 MultiNA with a DNA-500 kit (SHIMADZU, Japan).

Additional Information

Accession codes: NtFT4; AWOKO1087688, DROOPING LEAF; Os03g0215200/LOC_Os03g11600 LOC_Os11g04954, CYP72A32; LOC_Os01g41810, CYP72A33; LOC_Os01g41820, VIP1; LOC_Os12g06520, VIP1-like; LOC_Os11g06170, OsALS; LOC_Os02g30630, OsLIG6; Os01g49180, OsPDS; LOC_Os03g08570, OsPOLQ; LOC_Os12g19370. How to cite this article: Kaya, H. et al. Highly specific targeted mutagenesis in plants using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Sci. Rep. 6, 26871; doi: 10.1038/srep26871 (2016).
  36 in total

Review 1.  CRISPR-Cas systems in bacteria and archaea: versatile small RNAs for adaptive defense and regulation.

Authors:  Devaki Bhaya; Michelle Davison; Rodolphe Barrangou
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 16.830

2.  Early infection of scutellum tissue with Agrobacterium allows high-speed transformation of rice.

Authors:  Seiichi Toki; Naho Hara; Kazuko Ono; Haruko Onodera; Akemi Tagiri; Seibi Oka; Hiroshi Tanaka
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.417

Review 3.  Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9.

Authors:  Jennifer A Doudna; Emmanuelle Charpentier
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Genome editing with engineered nucleases in plants.

Authors:  Yuriko Osakabe; Keishi Osakabe
Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 4.927

Review 5.  The CRISPR/Cas9 system for plant genome editing and beyond.

Authors:  Luisa Bortesi; Rainer Fischer
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 14.227

6.  Both CRISPR/Cas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genome engineering in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Friedrich Fauser; Simon Schiml; Holger Puchta
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 6.417

7.  CRISPR RNA maturation by trans-encoded small RNA and host factor RNase III.

Authors:  Elitza Deltcheva; Krzysztof Chylinski; Cynthia M Sharma; Karine Gonzales; Yanjie Chao; Zaid A Pirzada; Maria R Eckert; Jörg Vogel; Emmanuelle Charpentier
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Efficient genome editing in plants using a CRISPR/Cas system.

Authors:  Zhengyan Feng; Botao Zhang; Wona Ding; Xiaodong Liu; Dong-Lei Yang; Pengliang Wei; Fengqiu Cao; Shihua Zhu; Feng Zhang; Yanfei Mao; Jian-Kang Zhu
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 25.617

9.  In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9.

Authors:  F Ann Ran; Le Cong; Winston X Yan; David A Scott; Jonathan S Gootenberg; Andrea J Kriz; Bernd Zetsche; Ophir Shalem; Xuebing Wu; Kira S Makarova; Eugene V Koonin; Phillip A Sharp; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Targeted mutagenesis using CRISPR/Cas system in medaka.

Authors:  Satoshi Ansai; Masato Kinoshita
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.422

View more
  32 in total

1.  PAM-less plant genome editing using a CRISPR-SpRY toolbox.

Authors:  Qiurong Ren; Simon Sretenovic; Shishi Liu; Xu Tang; Lan Huang; Yao He; Li Liu; Yachong Guo; Zhaohui Zhong; Guanqing Liu; Yanhao Cheng; Xuelian Zheng; Changtian Pan; Desuo Yin; Yingxiao Zhang; Wanfeng Li; Liwang Qi; Chenghao Li; Yiping Qi; Yong Zhang
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 15.793

Review 2.  CRISPR/Cas- and Topical RNAi-Based Technologies for Crop Management and Improvement: Reviewing the Risk Assessment and Challenges Towards a More Sustainable Agriculture.

Authors:  Fabiano Touzdjian Pinheiro Kohlrausch Távora; Francisco de Assis Dos Santos Diniz; Camila de Moraes Rêgo-Machado; Natália Chagas Freitas; Fabrício Barbosa Monteiro Arraes; Eduardo Chumbinho de Andrade; Leila Lourenço Furtado; Karen Ofuji Osiro; Natália Lima de Sousa; Thiago Bérgamo Cardoso; Liliane Márcia Mertz Henning; Patrícia Abrão de Oliveira Molinari; Sérgio Enrique Feingold; Wayne B Hunter; Maria Fátima Grossi de Sá; Adilson Kenji Kobayashi; Alexandre Lima Nepomuceno; Thaís Ribeiro Santiago; Hugo Bruno Correa Molinari
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-28

3.  Development of chimeric antigen receptors targeting T-cell malignancies using two structurally different anti-CD5 antigen binding domains in NK and CRISPR-edited T cell lines.

Authors:  Sunil S Raikar; Lauren C Fleischer; Robert Moot; Andrew Fedanov; Na Yoon Paik; Kristopher A Knight; Christopher B Doering; H Trent Spencer
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 8.110

4.  Application of Cas12a and nCas9-activation-induced cytidine deaminase for genome editing and as a non-sexual strategy to generate homozygous/multiplex edited plants in the allotetraploid genome of tobacco.

Authors:  Chen-Tran Hsu; Yu-Jung Cheng; Yu-Hsua Yuan; Wei-Fon Hung; Qiao-Wei Cheng; Fu-Hui Wu; Lan-Ying Lee; Stanton B Gelvin; Choun-Sea Lin
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 5.  CRISPR/Cas-mediated gene targeting in plants: finally a turn for the better for homologous recombination.

Authors:  Teng-Kuei Huang; Holger Puchta
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.570

6.  Efficient targeted mutagenesis of rice and tobacco genomes using Cpf1 from Francisella novicida.

Authors:  Akira Endo; Mikami Masafumi; Hidetaka Kaya; Seiichi Toki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Rapid Evolution of Manifold CRISPR Systems for Plant Genome Editing.

Authors:  Levi Lowder; Aimee Malzahn; Yiping Qi
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 8.  New variants of CRISPR RNA-guided genome editing enzymes.

Authors:  Jana Murovec; Žan Pirc; Bing Yang
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 9.803

Review 9.  Plant genome editing with TALEN and CRISPR.

Authors:  Aimee Malzahn; Levi Lowder; Yiping Qi
Journal:  Cell Biosci       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 7.133

Review 10.  CRISPR-Cas Targeting of Host Genes as an Antiviral Strategy.

Authors:  Shuliang Chen; Xiao Yu; Deyin Guo
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 5.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.