Literature DB >> 27225773

Encoding of Touch Intensity But Not Pleasantness in Human Primary Somatosensory Cortex.

Laura K Case1, Claire M Laubacher2, Håkan Olausson3, Binquan Wang2, Primavera A Spagnolo4, M Catherine Bushnell2.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Growing interest in affective touch has delineated a neural network that bypasses primary somatosensory cortex (S1). Several recent studies, however, have cast doubt on the segregation of touch discrimination and affect, suggesting that S1 also encodes affective qualities. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to examine the role of S1 in processing touch intensity and pleasantness. Twenty-six healthy human adults rated brushing on the hand during fMRI. Intensity ratings significantly predicted activation in S1, whereas pleasantness ratings predicted activation only in the anterior cingulate cortex. Nineteen subjects also received inhibitory rTMS over right hemisphere S1 and the vertex (control). After S1 rTMS, but not after vertex rTMS, sensory discrimination was reduced and subjects with reduced sensory discrimination rated touch as more intense. In contrast, rTMS did not alter ratings of touch pleasantness. Our findings support divergent neural processing of touch intensity and pleasantness, with affective touch encoded outside of S1. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Growing interest in affective touch has identified a neural network that bypasses primary somatosensory cortex (S1). Several recent studies, however, cast doubt on the separation of touch discrimination and affect. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to demonstrate the representation of touch discrimination and intensity in S1, but the representation of pleasantness in the anterior cingulate cortex, not S1. Our findings support divergent neural processing of touch intensity and pleasantness, with affective touch encoded outside of S1. Our study contributes to growing delineation of the affective touch system, a crucial step in understanding its dysregulation in numerous clinical conditions such as autism, eating disorders, depression, and chronic pain.
Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/365850-11$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  affect; c-tactile fibers; pleasantness; rTMS; somatosensory cortex; touch discrimination

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27225773      PMCID: PMC4879201          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1130-15.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  62 in total

1.  The representation of pleasant touch in the brain and its relationship with taste and olfactory areas.

Authors:  S Francis; E T Rolls; R Bowtell; F McGlone; J O'Doherty; A Browning; S Clare; E Smith
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1999-02-25       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Brain mechanisms for processing affective touch.

Authors:  Ilanit Gordon; Avery C Voos; Randi H Bennett; Danielle Z Bolling; Kevin A Pelphrey; Martha D Kaiser
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  How cognition modulates affective responses to taste and flavor: top-down influences on the orbitofrontal and pregenual cingulate cortices.

Authors:  Fabian Grabenhorst; Edmund T Rolls; Amy Bilderbeck
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 6.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a primer.

Authors:  Mark Hallett
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging data in FSL.

Authors:  Mark W Woolrich; Saad Jbabdi; Brian Patenaude; Michael Chappell; Salima Makni; Timothy Behrens; Christian Beckmann; Mark Jenkinson; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Coding of pleasant touch by unmyelinated afferents in humans.

Authors:  Line S Löken; Johan Wessberg; India Morrison; Francis McGlone; Håkan Olausson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Vicarious responses to social touch in posterior insular cortex are tuned to pleasant caressing speeds.

Authors:  India Morrison; Malin Björnsdotter; Håkan Olausson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  FSL.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  32 in total

Review 1.  Neural Basis of Touch and Proprioception in Primate Cortex.

Authors:  Benoit P Delhaye; Katie H Long; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 9.090

2.  Low-threshold mechanoreceptors play a frequency-dependent dual role in subjective ratings of mechanical allodynia.

Authors:  Line S Löken; Eugene P Duff; Irene Tracey
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Defining pleasant touch stimuli: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pankaj Taneja; Håkan Olausson; Mats Trulsson; Peter Svensson; Lene Baad-Hansen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-10-19

4.  Inhibitory rTMS of secondary somatosensory cortex reduces intensity but not pleasantness of gentle touch.

Authors:  Laura K Case; Claire M Laubacher; Emily A Richards; P A Spagnolo; Håkan Olausson; M Catherine Bushnell
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 5.  Emotion Perception from Face, Voice, and Touch: Comparisons and Convergence.

Authors:  Annett Schirmer; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 6.  Brain circuits for pain and its treatment.

Authors:  Nicole Mercer Lindsay; Chong Chen; Gadi Gilam; Sean Mackey; Grégory Scherrer
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 7.  Do we enjoy what we sense and perceive? A dissociation between aesthetic appreciation and basic perception of environmental objects or events.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Michael J Proulx; Alexandra A de Sousa; Lora T Likova
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.526

8.  Altered Intrinsic Brain Activity in Patients With Toothache Using the Percent Amplitude of a Fluctuation Method: A Resting-State fMRI Study.

Authors:  Jun Yang; Yi Shao; Yan-Kun Shen; Hong-Shui Zhu; Bin Li; Qiu-Yue Yu; Min Kang; San-Hua Xu; Ping Ying; Qian Ling; Jie Zou; Hong Wei; Yu-Lin He
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.086

9.  Low threshold unmyelinated mechanoafferents can modulate pain.

Authors:  Kathrin Habig; Anne Schänzer; Wolfgang Schirner; Gothje Lautenschläger; Benjamin Dassinger; Håkan Olausson; Frank Birklein; Elke R Gizewski; Heidrun H Krämer
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.474

10.  Large Postural Sways Prevent Foot Tactile Information From Fading: Neurophysiological Evidence.

Authors:  Marie Fabre; Marine Antoine; Mathieu Germain Robitaille; Edith Ribot-Ciscar; Rochelle Ackerley; Jean-Marc Aimonetti; Pascale Chavet; Jean Blouin; Martin Simoneau; Laurence Mouchnino
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-12-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.