Literature DB >> 28529174

Inhibitory rTMS of secondary somatosensory cortex reduces intensity but not pleasantness of gentle touch.

Laura K Case1, Claire M Laubacher2, Emily A Richards2, P A Spagnolo3, Håkan Olausson4, M Catherine Bushnell2.   

Abstract

Research suggests that the discriminative and affective aspects of touch are processed differently in the brain. Primary somatosensory cortex is strongly implicated in touch discrimination, whereas insular and prefronal regions have been associated with pleasantness aspects of touch. However, the role of secondary somatosensory cortex (S2) is less clear. In the current study we used inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to temporarily deactivate S2 and probe its role in touch perception. Nineteen healthy adults received two sessions of 1-Hz rTMS on separate days, one targeting right S2 and the other targeting the vertex (control). Before and after rTMS, subjects rated the intensity and pleasantness of slow and fast gentle brushing of the hand and performed a 2-point tactile discrimination task, followed by fMRI during additional brushing. rTMS to S2 (but not vertex) decreased intensity ratings of fast brushing, without altering touch pleasantness or spatial discrimination. MRI showed a reduced response to brushing in S2 (but not in S1 or insula) after S2 rTMS. Together, our results show that reducing touch-evoked activity in S2 decreases perceived touch intensity, suggesting a causal role of S2 in touch intensity perception. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intensity; Pleasantness; Secondary somatosensory cortex; Tactile; Touch; rTMS

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28529174      PMCID: PMC5530593          DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  39 in total

1.  Somatotopic organization of human secondary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  J Ruben; J Schwiemann; M Deuchert; R Meyer; T Krause; G Curio; K Villringer; R Kurth; A Villringer
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Short-lasting impairment of tactile perception by 0.9Hz-rTMS of the sensorimotor cortex.

Authors:  T Satow; T Mima; J Yamamoto; T Oga; T Begum; T Aso; N Hashimoto; J C Rothwell; H Shibasaki
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2003-03-25       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of deep brain regions: evidence for efficacy of the H-coil.

Authors:  Abraham Zangen; Yiftach Roth; Bernhard Voller; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-12-16       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 4.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a primer.

Authors:  Mark Hallett
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  A time-varying source connectivity approach to reveal human somatosensory information processing.

Authors:  L Hu; Z G Zhang; Y Hu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Direct skin-to-skin versus indirect touch modulates neural responses to stroking versus tapping.

Authors:  Inge U Kress; Ludovico Minati; Stefania Ferraro; Hugo D Critchley
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Encoding of Touch Intensity But Not Pleasantness in Human Primary Somatosensory Cortex.

Authors:  Laura K Case; Claire M Laubacher; Håkan Olausson; Binquan Wang; Primavera A Spagnolo; M Catherine Bushnell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Improvement of tactile discrimination performance and enlargement of cortical somatosensory maps after 5 Hz rTMS.

Authors:  Martin Tegenthoff; Patrick Ragert; Burkhard Pleger; Peter Schwenkreis; Ann-Freya Förster; Volker Nicolas; Hubert R Dinse
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-10-18       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus Responses Predict Perceived Pleasantness of Skin Stroking.

Authors:  Monika Davidovic; Emma H Jönsson; Håkan Olausson; Malin Björnsdotter
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Brain circuits for pain and its treatment.

Authors:  Nicole Mercer Lindsay; Chong Chen; Gadi Gilam; Sean Mackey; Grégory Scherrer
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  Balancing body ownership: Visual capture of proprioception and affectivity during vestibular stimulation.

Authors:  Sonia Ponzo; Louise P Kirsch; Aikaterini Fotopoulou; Paul M Jenkinson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Sensitivity to CT-optimal, Affective Touch Depends on Adult Attachment Style.

Authors:  Charlotte Krahé; Mariana von Mohr; Antje Gentsch; Lisette Guy; Chiara Vari; Tobias Nolte; Aikaterini Fotopoulou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Deactivation of default mode network during touch.

Authors:  Timmy Strauss; Robin Kämpe; J Paul Hamilton; Hakan Olausson; Fabian Rottstädt; Claudia Raue; Ilona Croy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  The Effectiveness of High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Patients with Neuropathic Orofacial Pain: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Yingxiu Diao; Yuhua Xie; Jiaxin Pan; Manxia Liao; Hao Liu; Linrong Liao
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 3.144

6.  Lack of Target Engagement Following Low-Frequency Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Anterior Insula.

Authors:  Primavera A Spagnolo; Han Wang; Prachaya Srivanitchapoom; Melanie Schwandt; Markus Heilig; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2018-10-29

7.  Effects of cTBS on the Frequency-Following Response and Other Auditory Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Fran López-Caballero; Pablo Martin-Trias; Teresa Ribas-Prats; Natàlia Gorina-Careta; David Bartrés-Faz; Carles Escera
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Dissociable sources of erogeneity in social touch: Imagining and perceiving C-Tactile optimal touch in erogenous zones.

Authors:  Elena Panagiotopoulou; Maria Laura Filippetti; Antje Gentsch; Aikaterini Fotopoulou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Damage to the right insula disrupts the perception of affective touch.

Authors:  Louise P Kirsch; Sahba Besharati; Christina Papadaki; Laura Crucianelli; Sara Bertagnoli; Nick Ward; Valentina Moro; Paul M Jenkinson; Aikaterini Fotopoulou
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 8.140

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.