Literature DB >> 27220944

Understanding Treatment Effect Terminology in Pain and Symptom Management Research.

Melissa M Garrido1, Bryan Dowd2, Paul L Hebert3, Matthew L Maciejewski4.   

Abstract

Within health services and medical research, there is a wide variety of terminology related to treatment effects. Understanding differences in types of treatment effects is especially important in pain and symptom management research where nonexperimental and quasiexperimental observational data analysis is common. We use the example of a palliative care consultation team leader considering implementation of a medication reconciliation program and a care-coordination intervention reported in the literature to illustrate population-level and conditional treatment effects and to highlight the sensitivity of values of treatment effects to sample selection and treatment assignment. Our goal is to facilitate appropriate reporting and interpretation of study results and to help investigators understand what information a decision maker needs when deciding whether to implement a treatment. Greater awareness of the reasons why treatment effects may differ across studies of the same patients in the same treatment settings can help policy makers and clinicians understand to whom a study's results may be generalized. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Treatment effect; health services research; observational study; randomized controlled trial; selection bias; terminology; treatment assignment

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27220944      PMCID: PMC6794006          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.01.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  20 in total

1.  Treating individuals 2. Subgroup analysis in randomised controlled trials: importance, indications, and interpretation.

Authors:  Peter M Rothwell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Jan 8-14       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Authors:  Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  ESTIMATING PERSON-CENTERED TREATMENT (PeT) EFFECTS USING INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES: AN APPLICATION TO EVALUATING PROSTATE CANCER TREATMENTS.

Authors:  Anirban Basu
Journal:  J Appl Econ (Chichester Engl)       Date:  2014 June/July

4.  Generalizing observational study results: applying propensity score methods to complex surveys.

Authors:  Eva H Dugoff; Megan Schuler; Elizabeth A Stuart
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Choosing models for health care cost analyses: issues of nonlinearity and endogeneity.

Authors:  Melissa M Garrido; Partha Deb; James F Burgess; Joan D Penrod
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of octreotide in malignant bowel obstruction.

Authors:  David C Currow; Stephen Quinn; Meera Agar; Belinda Fazekas; Janet Hardy; Nikki McCaffrey; Simon Eckermann; Amy P Abernethy; Katherine Clark
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.612

7.  Interpreting treatment-effect estimates with heterogeneity and choice: simulation model results.

Authors:  John M Brooks; Gang Fang
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.393

8.  CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.

Authors:  Kenneth F Schulz; Douglas G Altman; David Moher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-03-23

9.  Use of instrumental variables in the presence of heterogeneity and self-selection: an application to treatments of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Anirban Basu; James J Heckman; Salvador Navarro-Lozano; Sergio Urzua
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  A tutorial on propensity score estimation for multiple treatments using generalized boosted models.

Authors:  Daniel F McCaffrey; Beth Ann Griffin; Daniel Almirall; Mary Ellen Slaughter; Rajeev Ramchand; Lane F Burgette
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  4 in total

1.  Assessing the ability of an instrumental variable causal forest algorithm to personalize treatment evidence using observational data: the case of early surgery for shoulder fracture.

Authors:  John M Brooks; Cole G Chapman; Sarah B Floyd; Brian K Chen; Charles A Thigpen; Michael Kissenberth
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 4.612

2.  Association of Surgical Treatment With Adverse Events and Mortality Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Proximal Humerus Fracture.

Authors:  Sarah B Floyd; Charles Thigpen; Michael Kissenberth; John M Brooks
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-01-03

3.  The Impact of Primary Tumor Resection on Survival in Asymptomatic Colorectal Cancer Patients With Unresectable Metastases.

Authors:  Ki Yoon Doah; Ui Sup Shin; Byong Ho Jeon; Sang Sik Cho; Sun Mi Moon
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2021-04-30

4.  What are the health consequences associated with differences in medical malpractice liability laws? An instrumental variable analysis of surgery effects on health outcomes for proximal humeral facture across states with different liability rules.

Authors:  Brian Chen; Sarah Floyd; Dakshu Jindal; Cole Chapman; John Brooks
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 2.908

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.