Literature DB >> 27218886

Personalized in vitro cancer models to predict therapeutic response: Challenges and a framework for improvement.

Molly M Morgan1, Brian P Johnson1, Megan K Livingston1, Linda A Schuler2, Elaine T Alarid3, Kyung E Sung4, David J Beebe5.   

Abstract

Personalized cancer therapy focuses on characterizing the relevant phenotypes of the patient, as well as the patient's tumor, to predict the most effective cancer therapy. Historically, these methods have not proven predictive in regards to predicting therapeutic response. Emerging culture platforms are designed to better recapitulate the in vivo environment, thus, there is renewed interest in integrating patient samples into in vitro cancer models to assess therapeutic response. Successful examples of translating in vitro response to clinical relevance are limited due to issues with patient sample acquisition, variability and culture. We will review traditional and emerging in vitro models for personalized medicine, focusing on the technologies, microenvironmental components, and readouts utilized. We will then offer our perspective on how to apply a framework derived from toxicology and ecology towards designing improved personalized in vitro models of cancer. The framework serves as a tool for identifying optimal readouts and culture conditions, thus maximizing the information gained from each patient sample.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse outcome pathway; Chemotherapy sensitivity and resistance assays; Microenvironment; Personalized medicine; Targeted therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27218886      PMCID: PMC5439438          DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0163-7258            Impact factor:   12.310


  218 in total

Review 1.  Adverse outcome pathways: a conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment.

Authors:  Gerald T Ankley; Richard S Bennett; Russell J Erickson; Dale J Hoff; Michael W Hornung; Rodney D Johnson; David R Mount; John W Nichols; Christine L Russom; Patricia K Schmieder; Jose A Serrrano; Joseph E Tietge; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 2.  Mammary expression of xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes and their potential role in breast cancer.

Authors:  J A Williams; D H Phillips
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Breast cancer survival and in vitro tumor response in the extreme drug resistance assay.

Authors:  R S Mehta; R Bornstein; I R Yu; R J Parker; C E McLaren; K P Nguyen; K T Li; J P Fruehauf
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 4.  Estrogens as endogenous genotoxic agents--DNA adducts and mutations.

Authors:  E Cavalieri; K Frenkel; J G Liehr; E Rogan; D Roy
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2000

5.  Estrogen down-regulates uncoupling proteins and increases oxidative stress in breast cancer.

Authors:  Jorge Sastre-Serra; Adamo Valle; Maria Margarita Company; Isabel Garau; Jordi Oliver; Pilar Roca
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 7.376

6.  Enhancement of insulin-like growth factor signaling in human breast cancer: estrogen regulation of insulin receptor substrate-1 expression in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  A V Lee; J G Jackson; J L Gooch; S G Hilsenbeck; E Coronado-Heinsohn; C K Osborne; D Yee
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  1999-05

Review 7.  Multicellular spheroids in ovarian cancer metastases: Biology and pathology.

Authors:  Kristy Shield; M Leigh Ackland; Nuzhat Ahmed; Gregory E Rice
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Understanding the impact of 2D and 3D fibroblast cultures on in vitro breast cancer models.

Authors:  Kyung Eun Sung; Xiaojing Su; Erwin Berthier; Carolyn Pehlke; Andreas Friedl; David J Beebe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Estrogen, mitochondria, and growth of cancer and non-cancer cells.

Authors:  Quentin Felty; Deodutta Roy
Journal:  J Carcinog       Date:  2005-01-15

10.  Microfluidic model of ductal carcinoma in situ with 3D, organotypic structure.

Authors:  Lauren L Bischel; David J Beebe; Kyung E Sung
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Genomic evolution of cancer models: perils and opportunities.

Authors:  Uri Ben-David; Rameen Beroukhim; Todd R Golub
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  A Three-Dimensional In Vitro Coculture Model to Quantify Breast Epithelial Cell Adhesion to Endothelial Cells.

Authors:  Swathi Swaminathan; Aaron N Cranston; Alisa Morss Clyne
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.056

3.  Organotypic Models of Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Anna Pomerenke
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.291

4.  The Adverse Outcome Pathway: A Multifaceted Framework Supporting 21st Century Toxicology.

Authors:  Gerald T Ankley; Stephen W Edwards
Journal:  Curr Opin Toxicol       Date:  2018-06-01

Review 5.  Modeling chemical effects on breast cancer: the importance of the microenvironment in vitro.

Authors:  Molly M Morgan; Linda A Schuler; Jordan C Ciciliano; Brian P Johnson; Elaine T Alarid; David J Beebe
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  Mammary adipose stromal cells derived from obese women reduce sensitivity to the aromatase inhibitor anastrazole in an organotypic breast model.

Authors:  Molly M Morgan; Lisa M Arendt; Elaine T Alarid; David J Beebe; Brian P Johnson
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  In Silico Approaches In Carcinogenicity Hazard Assessment: Current Status and Future Needs.

Authors:  Raymond R Tice; Arianna Bassan; Alexander Amberg; Lennart T Anger; Marc A Beal; Phillip Bellion; Romualdo Benigni; Jeffrey Birmingham; Alessandro Brigo; Frank Bringezu; Lidia Ceriani; Ian Crooks; Kevin Cross; Rosalie Elespuru; David M Faulkner; Marie C Fortin; Paul Fowler; Markus Frericks; Helga H J Gerets; Gloria D Jahnke; David R Jones; Naomi L Kruhlak; Elena Lo Piparo; Juan Lopez-Belmonte; Amarjit Luniwal; Alice Luu; Federica Madia; Serena Manganelli; Balasubramanian Manickam; Jordi Mestres; Amy L Mihalchik-Burhans; Louise Neilson; Arun Pandiri; Manuela Pavan; Cynthia V Rider; John P Rooney; Alejandra Trejo-Martin; Karen H Watanabe-Sailor; Angela T White; David Woolley; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2021-09-23

8.  Evaluation of PEG-based hydrogel influence on estrogen receptor driven responses in MCF7 breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Megan K Livingston; Molly M Morgan; William T Daly; William L Murphy; Brian P Johnson; David J Beebe; Maria Virumbrales-Muñoz
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2019

Review 9.  FutureTox IV Workshop Summary: Predictive Toxicology for Healthy Children.

Authors:  Thomas B Knudsen; Suzanne Compton Fitzpatrick; K Nadira De Abrew; Linda S Birnbaum; Anne Chappelle; George P Daston; Dana C Dolinoy; Alison Elder; Susan Euling; Elaine M Faustman; Kristi Pullen Fedinick; Jill A Franzosa; Derik E Haggard; Laurie Haws; Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Germaine M Buck Louis; Donna L Mendrick; Ruthann Rudel; Katerine S Saili; Thaddeus T Schug; Robyn L Tanguay; Alexandra E Turley; Barbara A Wetmore; Kimberly W White; Todd J Zurlinden
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 10.  Cancer models in preclinical research: A chronicle review of advancement in effective cancer research.

Authors:  Humna Sajjad; Saiqa Imtiaz; Tayyaba Noor; Yusra Hasan Siddiqui; Anila Sajjad; Muhammad Zia
Journal:  Animal Model Exp Med       Date:  2021-03-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.