Literature DB >> 11510694

Breast cancer survival and in vitro tumor response in the extreme drug resistance assay.

R S Mehta1, R Bornstein, I R Yu, R J Parker, C E McLaren, K P Nguyen, K T Li, J P Fruehauf.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether in vitro extreme drug resistance (EDR) assay results for patients with breast carcinoma were associated with clinical outcome after chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: EDR assays were performed on tumor tissue obtained from 103 newly diagnosed breast cancer cases. EDR scores of 2 for low, 1 for intermediate, or 0 for extreme drug resistance were determined for each agent tested. In vitro EDR scores for 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide (4HC) and doxorubicin were summed for patients treated with AC, or for 4HC and 5-FU for patients treated with CMF. Treatment selection was blinded to assay results.
RESULTS: Median time to progression was significantly shorter for patients with extreme or intermediate in vitro resistance (n = 55, 48 months), compared to patients with low in vitro resistance, (n = 41, 100 months, p = 0.022). Patients demonstrating extreme to intermediate drug resistance also showed poorer survival than the low resistance group (49.5 months vs. not reached, median follow-up 48 months, p =0.011). Summed EDR scores, stage, and number of lymph nodes were significantly associated with survival in univariate and multivariate analysis. Compared to EDR scores of 4, summed EDR scores of 0-1 and summed EDR scores of 2-3 were associated with a relative risk of death of 3.09 (95%, CI 1.05-9.06, Cox proportional hazards model, p = 0.040) and 2.35 (95%, CI 1.07-5.15, Cox proportional hazards model, p = 0.033), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Extreme drug resistance testing identified patients with individual patterns of drug resistance prior to therapy. In this cohort of breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy, summed EDR scores were significantly associated with time to tumor progression and overall survival. EDR results may offer a method for optimizing treatment selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11510694     DOI: 10.1023/a:1010604502627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  13 in total

Review 1.  Perspectives in chemosensitivity and chemoresistance assays and their implementation in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Lara Bussmann; Chia-Jung Busch; Balazs B Lörincz; Thorsten Rieckmann; Andreas Block; Rainald Knecht
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Recent applications of chemosensitivity tests for colorectal cancer treatment.

Authors:  Yong Sik Yoon; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  In vitro extreme drug resistance assay to taxanes or platinum compounds for the prediction of clinical outcomes in epithelial ovarian cancer: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hee Seung Kim; Tae Joong Kim; Hyun Hoon Chung; Jae Weon Kim; Byung Gie Kim; Noh Hyun Park; Yong Sang Song; Duk Soo Bae; Soon Beom Kang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-05-16       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  A prospective blinded study of the predictive value of an extreme drug resistance assay in patients receiving CPT-11 for recurrent glioma.

Authors:  Ricardo J Parker; John P Fruehauf; Rita Mehta; Emese Filka; Timothy Cloughesy
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Prediction of drug response in breast cancer using integrative experimental/computational modeling.

Authors:  Hermann B Frieboes; Mary E Edgerton; John P Fruehauf; Felicity R A J Rose; Lisa K Worrall; Robert A Gatenby; Mauro Ferrari; Vittorio Cristini
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 6.  Personalized in vitro cancer models to predict therapeutic response: Challenges and a framework for improvement.

Authors:  Molly M Morgan; Brian P Johnson; Megan K Livingston; Linda A Schuler; Elaine T Alarid; Kyung E Sung; David J Beebe
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 12.310

7.  A novel 96well-formatted micro-gap plate enabling drug response profiling on primary tumour samples.

Authors:  Wei-Yuan Ma; Lo-Chang Hsiung; Chen-Ho Wang; Chi-Ling Chiang; Ching-Hung Lin; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Andrew M Wo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Ex Vivo Analysis of Primary Tumor Specimens for Evaluation of Cancer Therapeutics.

Authors:  Cristina E Tognon; Rosalie C Sears; Gordon B Mills; Joe W Gray; Jeffrey W Tyner
Journal:  Annu Rev Cancer Biol       Date:  2020-12-08

Review 9.  Tumor Chemosensitivity Assays Are Helpful for Personalized Cytotoxic Treatments in Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Engin Ulukaya; Didem Karakas; Konstantinos Dimas
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 2.430

10.  Prediction of clinical response to drugs in ovarian cancer using the chemotherapy resistance test (CTR-test).

Authors:  Frank Christian Kischkel; Carina Meyer; Julia Eich; Mani Nassir; Monika Mentze; Ioana Braicu; Annette Kopp-Schneider; Jalid Sehouli
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 4.234

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.