| Literature DB >> 27217243 |
Sydney E Scott1, Yoel Inbar2, Paul Rozin3.
Abstract
Public opposition to genetic modification (GM) technology in the food domain is widespread (Frewer et al., 2013). In a survey of U.S. residents representative of the population on gender, age, and income, 64% opposed GM, and 71% of GM opponents (45% of the entire sample) were "absolutely" opposed-that is, they agreed that GM should be prohibited no matter the risks and benefits. "Absolutist" opponents were more disgust sensitive in general and more disgusted by the consumption of genetically modified food than were non-absolutist opponents or supporters. Furthermore, disgust predicted support for legal restrictions on genetically modified foods, even after controlling for explicit risk-benefit assessments. This research suggests that many opponents are evidence insensitive and will not be influenced by arguments about risks and benefits.Keywords: biotechnology; disgust; genetic engineering; genetic modification; moralization; protected values; sacred values
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27217243 DOI: 10.1177/1745691615621275
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Perspect Psychol Sci ISSN: 1745-6916