Literature DB >> 27217243

Evidence for Absolute Moral Opposition to Genetically Modified Food in the United States.

Sydney E Scott1, Yoel Inbar2, Paul Rozin3.   

Abstract

Public opposition to genetic modification (GM) technology in the food domain is widespread (Frewer et al., 2013). In a survey of U.S. residents representative of the population on gender, age, and income, 64% opposed GM, and 71% of GM opponents (45% of the entire sample) were "absolutely" opposed-that is, they agreed that GM should be prohibited no matter the risks and benefits. "Absolutist" opponents were more disgust sensitive in general and more disgusted by the consumption of genetically modified food than were non-absolutist opponents or supporters. Furthermore, disgust predicted support for legal restrictions on genetically modified foods, even after controlling for explicit risk-benefit assessments. This research suggests that many opponents are evidence insensitive and will not be influenced by arguments about risks and benefits.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Keywords:  biotechnology; disgust; genetic engineering; genetic modification; moralization; protected values; sacred values

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27217243     DOI: 10.1177/1745691615621275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci        ISSN: 1745-6916


  16 in total

1.  Aversion to playing God and moral condemnation of technology and science.

Authors:  Adam Waytz; Liane Young
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Why are people antiscience, and what can we do about it?

Authors:  Aviva Philipp-Muller; Spike W S Lee; Richard E Petty
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 12.779

3.  Genetically modified (GM) late blight-resistant potato and consumer attitudes before and after a field visit.

Authors:  Jéssica Bubolz; Patrycja Sleboda; Anna Lehrman; Sven-Ove Hansson; Carl Johan Lagerkvist; Björn Andersson; Marit Lenman; Svante Resjö; Marc Ghislain; Muhammad Awais Zahid; Nam Phuong Kieu; Erik Andreasson
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2022-12-31       Impact factor: 3.118

4.  Scaling up interactive argumentation by providing counterarguments with a chatbot.

Authors:  Sacha Altay; Marlène Schwartz; Anne-Sophie Hacquin; Aurélien Allard; Stefaan Blancke; Hugo Mercier
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2022-02-14

5.  Food Neophobia and Food Disgust: The Mediating Role of Perceived Vulnerability to Disease.

Authors:  Giuseppe Santisi; Paola Magnano; Vittorio Edoardo Scuderi
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-29

6.  Attitudes to in vitro meat: A survey of potential consumers in the United States.

Authors:  Matti Wilks; Clive J C Phillips
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Spiritual skepticism? Heterogeneous science skepticism in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Bastiaan T Rutjens; Romy van der Lee
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2020-03-04

8.  Integrating social and cognitive aspects of belief dynamics: towards a unifying framework.

Authors:  Mirta Galesic; Henrik Olsson; Jonas Dalege; Tamara van der Does; Daniel L Stein
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Not All Skepticism Is Equal: Exploring the Ideological Antecedents of Science Acceptance and Rejection.

Authors:  Bastiaan T Rutjens; Robbie M Sutton; Romy van der Lee
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2017-12-01

10.  Acceptability of genetically engineered algae biofuels in Europe: opinions of experts and stakeholders.

Authors:  Jessica Varela Villarreal; Cecilia Burgués; Christine Rösch
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 6.040

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.