Literature DB >> 36263889

Genetically modified (GM) late blight-resistant potato and consumer attitudes before and after a field visit.

Jéssica Bubolz1, Patrycja Sleboda2, Anna Lehrman3, Sven-Ove Hansson3, Carl Johan Lagerkvist2, Björn Andersson4, Marit Lenman1, Svante Resjö1, Marc Ghislain5, Muhammad Awais Zahid1, Nam Phuong Kieu1,6, Erik Andreasson1.   

Abstract

Late blight, caused by Phytophthora infestans, is the most devastating disease in potato production. Here, we show full late blight resistance in a location with a genetically diverse pathogen population with the use of GM potato stacked with three resistance (R) genes over three seasons. In addition, using this field trials, we demonstrate that in-the-field intervention among consumers led to change for more favorable attitude generally toward GM crops.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GM foods; GM potato; IPM; R-genes; late blight; phytophthora infestans

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36263889      PMCID: PMC9586588          DOI: 10.1080/21645698.2022.2133396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  GM Crops Food        ISSN: 2164-5698            Impact factor:   3.118


  21 in total

1.  Consumer attitudes towards genetically modified foods.

Authors:  Maria K Magnusson; Ulla-Kaisa Koivisto Hursti
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.868

2.  Effects of Knowledge on Attitude Formation and Change Toward Genetically Modified Foods.

Authors:  Xiaoqin Zhu; Xiaofei Xie
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 4.000

3.  Extreme opponents of genetically modified foods know the least but think they know the most.

Authors:  Philip M Fernbach; Nicholas Light; Sydney E Scott; Yoel Inbar; Paul Rozin
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2019-01-14

4.  Genetically modified food versus knowledge and fear: A Noumenic approach for consumer behaviour.

Authors:  Flavio Boccia; Daniela Covino; Pasquale Sarnacchiaro
Journal:  Food Res Int       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 6.475

5.  Actually, natural is neutral.

Authors:  Sydney E Scott; Paul Rozin
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-10

6.  Communicating about the risks and benefits of genetically modified foods: the mediating role of trust.

Authors:  Lynn J Frewer; Joachim Scholderer; Lone Bredahl
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.000

7.  Poppr: an R package for genetic analysis of populations with clonal, partially clonal, and/or sexual reproduction.

Authors:  Zhian N Kamvar; Javier F Tabima; Niklaus J Grünwald
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Determinants of stated willingness to pay for public goods: A study in the headline method.

Authors:  Daniel Kahneman; Ilana Ritov
Journal:  J Risk Uncertain       Date:  1994

9.  Tissue Culture and Refreshment Techniques for Improvement of Transformation in Local Tetraploid and Diploid Potato with Late Blight Resistance as an Example.

Authors:  Eu Sheng Wang; Nam Phuong Kieu; Marit Lenman; Erik Andreasson
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-29

10.  The inverse relation between risks and benefits: The impact of individual differences in information processing style.

Authors:  Patrycja Sleboda; Carl Johan Lagerkvist
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.