| Literature DB >> 27216740 |
Vidya Sagar1, Venkata Subba Rao Atluri1, Sudheesh Pilakka-Kanthikeel1, Madhavan Nair2.
Abstract
The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is a neurotropic virus. It induces neurotoxicity and subsequent brain pathologies in different brain cells. Addiction to recreational drugs remarkably affects the initiation of HIV infections and expedites the progression of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) associated neuropathogenesis. Symptoms of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) are noticed in many AIDS patients. At least 50 % of HIV diagnosed cases show one or other kind of neuropathological signs or symptoms during different stages of disease progression. In the same line, mild to severe neurological alterations are seen in at least 80 % autopsies of AIDS patients. Neurological illnesses weaken the connections between neurons causing significant altercations in synaptic plasticity. Synaptic plasticity alterations during HIV infection and recreational drug abuse are mediated by complex cellular phenomena involving changes in gene expression and subsequent loss of dendritic and spine morphology and physiology. New treatment strategies with ability to deliver drugs across blood-brain barrier (BBB) are being intensively investigated. In this context, magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) based nanoformulations have shown significant potential for target specificity, drug delivery, drug release, and bioavailability of desired amount of drugs in non-invasive brain targeting. MNPs-based potential therapies to promote neuronal plasticity during HIV infection and recreational drug abuse are being developed.Entities:
Keywords: BDNF; Bath salt; Blood-brain barrier; Cocaine; HDAC2; HIV/AIDS; Magnetic nanoparticles; Methamphetamine; Morphine; Neuropathogenesis; Nicotine; Synaptic plasticity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27216740 PMCID: PMC4878083 DOI: 10.1186/s13041-016-0236-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Brain ISSN: 1756-6606 Impact factor: 4.041
Fig. 1a–d- Confocal microscopy image showing changes in dendritic and spinal morphology of uninfected/untreated (a), HIV infected (b) [64], Morphine (c) [76], and Nicotine treated (d) [62] neuroblastoma (SKNMC) cells; e-f- Types of magnetic nanoformulations: Magnetoliposomes (e) [11] and Magnetic layer-by-layer assembly (f) [72]; g- In vitro BBB model for : Astrocytes-Endothelial cells co-culture in vitro BBB model: Culture plate is bi-compartmentalized via a transwell porous membrane. The top and underside of this membrane is cultured respectively with tightly junctioned endothelial cells and astrocytes which correspondingly mimics the external (peripheral blood side) and internal (brain microenvironment side) surface of BBB. Magnetic force is applied at the bottom of transwell which influence the transmigration of magnetic nanoformulations [11] (h)- Mechanism of MNPs targeting in rodent model: Anesthetized mouse can be placed in a platform with their head positioned between the poles of magnetic coil and retained in the desired field for desired time period. i- Proposed schematic of MNPs-based drugs delivery in human brain: Under the influence of in silico-controlled, non-invasive magnetic force from exterior, drug loaded magnetic nanocarriers can be directly transported across the BBB. Drug release at target is mediated by manually uncontrollable, cellular responses such as change in temperature, pH, intracellular Ca2 + level, etc. or by externally controlled mechanism such as magneto-electric force, radio-frequency magnetic force, etc. Leftover MNPs biodegrades automatically in 2–3 weeks without negative physiological implications in brain or may be cleared immediately by applying reverse magnetic force
A comparison of various nanoparticle systems: all of these systems are in preclinical stages for targeted delivery of anti-retroviral and/or anti-addiction drugs to the drug-impenetrable physiological barrier and more rigorous research-homework (particularly in vivo) has to be elucidated to sort out various associated shortcomings
| Nanocarriers | Current research standings | Technical limitations and potential improvements |
|---|---|---|
| Dendrimers | ✓ Preclinical: in vitro BBB model shows increased transmigration of therapeutics; however, yet to be supported by in vivo transendothelial migration assay. | ✓ Synthesis process is complex and drug release is inconsistent or premature as well. |
| ✓ Polycationic moieties of dendrimers induce cytotoxicity and as such, its toxicity on various brain cells must be well defined. | ||
| Polymers | ✓ Preclinical: In vitro and mouse model studies shows increased transendothelial migration of therapeutics. | ✓ Induces transient inflammation and found less ideal for delivery of polar/ionic compounds. As such occurrences of adverse effect, if any, on neuronal cells must be defined and potential of natural polymers should also be explored. |
| Liposomes | ✓ Preclinical: In vitro and rat model studies shows increased migration of therapeutics across BBB. | ✓ Drug entrapment ability, in general, is low and it worsens for the water-soluble drugs. Further, drug leaching and carrier instability during storage is also a concern. |
| ✓ Surface modifications such as PEGylation improves the inherent poor stability of conventional liposomes and can also reduce their uptake by reticuloendothelial system resulting in improved bioavailability. Further, it can be developed as “Trojan nanocarrier” residing in the monocytes/macrophages which naturally transmigrate across BBB. | ||
| Solid-lipid | ✓ Preclinical: in vitro BBB model shows increased trans-endothelia migration of therapeutics. | ✓ Although natural ability of lipophilic material (building block of Solid-lipid nanoparticles (SLN)) to cross the BBB makes SLN a favorable carrier for brain drug delivery, in vivo trans-endothelial migration studies are required to authenticate its applicability. |
| Micelle | ✓ Preclinical: In vitro and mouse model studies shows increased migration of therapeutics across BBB. | ✓ Intrinsic nature of particles instability cause premature drug release. In this regard, neuronal cells specific ligand tethering on surface of nanocarrier may improve the active brain targeting. |
| Magnetic | ✓ Preclinical: in vitro BBB model shows increased trans-endothelial migration of therapeutics and several in vivo study show successful brain delivery of MNPs. | ✓ Limited in vivo study showing site-specific targeting and lab-to-land transfer ability for anti-retroviral and anti-addiction drugs. |
| ✓ Advantages over other nanoparticles: Movement and speed of nanocarrier can be controlled by external magnetic force which helps in escape of nanocarriers’ uptake from reticuloendothelial system and subsequently accelerated active targeting and increased bioavailability is achieved. | ✓ Also, MNPs can be hybridized with liposomes as “Magneto-liposomes” for development of magnetized “Trojan nanocarrier” residing in the monocytes/macrophages. While monocytes/macrophages can naturally transmigrate across BBB, presence of “magneto-liposomes” in its cytoplasmic space can add to its movement influenced by external magnetic force. |
Fig. 2a - Schematic illustration showing process of drug loading on MNPs. Interaction between negative charge on MNPs surface and positive charge on different moieties of drug molecules influence drug binding on MNPs [62]. b-c-Geometry of magnetic-polymer layer-by-layer (b) and magnetoliposomes (c) assembly under magnetic field: Application of external magnetic field generate torque and magnetic pulse in the encapsulated MNPs such that external layer of carrier is disturbed and distorted. This results in increased carrier permeability [84, 85]