| Literature DB >> 27213498 |
Katrin Busch1, Hans-Reimer Rodewald.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation has yielded tremendous information on experimental properties of HSCs. Yet, it remains unclear whether transplantation reflects the physiology of hematopoiesis. A limitation is the difficulty in accessing HSC functions without isolation, in-vitro manipulation and readout for potential. New genetic fate mapping and clonal marking techniques now shed light on hematopoiesis under physiological conditions. RECENTEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27213498 PMCID: PMC4900429 DOI: 10.1097/MOH.0000000000000250
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Opin Hematol ISSN: 1065-6251 Impact factor: 3.284
FIGURE 1Schematic depiction of HSC diversity and contribution to hematopoiesis tested in transplantation or by fate mapping. (a) Transfer of HSC leads to a transient multiclonal contribution in the first weeks after injection. The majority of HSC clones is lost within the first 4 months, and long-term engraftment is achieved by only a few dominating HSC clones. Individual clones are symbolized by colored lines. (b) Tamoxifen induces Cre/loxP-mediated recombination of the Rosa26 reporter locus, resulting in YFP-expression in Tie2+ HSCs and their progeny. This reveals polyclonal participation of many HSCs in hematopoiesis, with each individual HSC contributing only rarely (on average about once every 110 days, with perhaps some variation in individual timing) [19▪▪]. Individual clones are indicated by colored lines, and waves indicate periods of activity. HSC, hematopoietic stem cell; Mer, mutated estrogen receptor site; MerCreMer, Cre recombinase fused to two Mer sites.
Quantitative and qualitative hallmarks of hematopoietic stem cells, and experimental advantages and limitations (shown on top) vs. experimental categories discussed in this review (shown on left)
| Number of contributing HSC | Progeny/clone size | Self-renewal | Multipotency | Advantages | Limitations | |
| Transplantation of HSC | Number of long-term contributing HSCs low | Expansion of few HSCs | High | Directly measureable for single cells | Measures stem-cell behavior | Test of repopulating activity; data valid for transplantation but not necessarily for normal hematopoiesis |
| Size of individual clones large | HSC exhaustion after 4–5 serial rounds of transplantation | Evidence for HSC heterogeneity | Direct comparison of stem-cell properties by competitive transplantation | Irradiation affects stem-cell niche | ||
| Shows whether defects are intrinsic or extrinsic of hematopoietic system | Only low number of transferred clones contribute long term | |||||
| Amplification (from one donor into many recipients) | Representative for all transferred HSCs? | |||||
| Transplantation of barcoded HSC | See above | See above | See above | See above | Marking and analysis of HSC on clonal level | Transplantation (see above) |
| High resolution of HSC output and lineage relationships under conditions of transplantation | Integration sites may not be neutral | |||||
| In-situ fate mapping (inducible genetic marks in HSC | High | Lower than in transplantation | Low | Yes, for labeled cell pool. At the clonal level unknown; requires ‘endogeneous barcoding’ | Physiological context; insight into unperturbed HSC functions; led to data on frequencies of active HSCs, flux through the system, and on ageing | Labelled HSC subset might not be representative for the whole population |
| Low individual contribution | Clone sizes strictly regulated to avoid dominant clones/prevent leukemia | Locus has to be HSC specific, no background in the absence of induction is essential | ||||
| HSC driver loci hard to identify and time consuming to test mouse lines | ||||||
| Single-cell tracing by transposon barcoding | High | Low | Low | Yes | Marking and analysis of individual cells | Barcodes have been introduced broadly into the entire hematopoietic system; information mostly limited to high-turnover populations (granulocytes) |
| Analysis of lineage relationships possible | Integration sites may not be neutral | |||||
| High resolution | ||||||
| Single-cell analysis by transcriptome, proteome analysis | These parameters (functional properties) cannot be directly addressed | New markers describing cell populations | Ideally, transcriptome data have to be combined with proteome analysis | |||
| Defining new subgroups | Correlation between phenotype and in-situ behavior uncertain | |||||
HSC, hematopoietic stem cell.