Lina Zhao1, Shouhao Zhou2, Peter Balter3, Chan Shen4, Daniel R Gomez1, James D Welsh1, Steve H Lin1, Joe Y Chang5. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 2. Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 3. Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 4. Department of Health Service Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: jychang@mdanderson.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To identify the optimal dose parameters predictive for local/lobar control after stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study encompassed a total of 1092 patients (1200 lesions) with NSCLC of clinical stage T1-T2 N0M0 who were treated with SABR of 50 Gy in 4 fractions or 70 Gy in 10 fractions, depending on tumor location/size, using computed tomography-based heterogeneity corrections and a convolution superposition calculation algorithm. Patients were monitored by chest CT or positron emission tomography/CT and/or biopsy after SABR. Factors predicting local/lobar recurrence (LR) were determined by competing risk multivariate analysis. Continuous variables were divided into 2 subgroups at cutoff values identified by receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: At a median follow-up time of 31.7 months (interquartile range, 14.8-51.3 months), the 5-year time to local recurrence within the same lobe and overall survival rates were 93.8% and 44.8%, respectively. Total cumulative number of patients experiencing LR was 40 (3.7%), occurring at a median time of 14.4 months (range, 4.8-46 months). Using multivariate competing risk analysis, independent predictive factors for LR after SABR were minimum biologically effective dose (BED10) to 95% of planning target volume (PTVD95 BED10) ≤86 Gy (corresponding to PTV D95 physics dose of 42 Gy in 4 fractions or 55 Gy in 10 fractions) and gross tumor volume ≥8.3 cm(3). The PTVmean BED10 was highly correlated with PTVD95 BED10. In univariate analysis, a cutoff of 130 Gy for PTVmean BED10 (corresponding to PTVmean physics dose of 55 Gy in 4 fractions or 75 Gy in 10 fractions) was also significantly associated with LR. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to gross tumor volume, higher radiation dose delivered to the PTV predicts for better local/lobar control. We recommend that both PTVD95 BED10 >86 Gy and PTVmean BED10 >130 Gy should be considered for SABR plan optimization.
PURPOSE: To identify the optimal dose parameters predictive for local/lobar control after stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study encompassed a total of 1092 patients (1200 lesions) with NSCLC of clinical stage T1-T2 N0M0 who were treated with SABR of 50 Gy in 4 fractions or 70 Gy in 10 fractions, depending on tumor location/size, using computed tomography-based heterogeneity corrections and a convolution superposition calculation algorithm. Patients were monitored by chest CT or positron emission tomography/CT and/or biopsy after SABR. Factors predicting local/lobar recurrence (LR) were determined by competing risk multivariate analysis. Continuous variables were divided into 2 subgroups at cutoff values identified by receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: At a median follow-up time of 31.7 months (interquartile range, 14.8-51.3 months), the 5-year time to local recurrence within the same lobe and overall survival rates were 93.8% and 44.8%, respectively. Total cumulative number of patients experiencing LR was 40 (3.7%), occurring at a median time of 14.4 months (range, 4.8-46 months). Using multivariate competing risk analysis, independent predictive factors for LR after SABR were minimum biologically effective dose (BED10) to 95% of planning target volume (PTVD95 BED10) ≤86 Gy (corresponding to PTV D95 physics dose of 42 Gy in 4 fractions or 55 Gy in 10 fractions) and gross tumor volume ≥8.3 cm(3). The PTVmean BED10 was highly correlated with PTVD95 BED10. In univariate analysis, a cutoff of 130 Gy for PTVmean BED10 (corresponding to PTVmean physics dose of 55 Gy in 4 fractions or 75 Gy in 10 fractions) was also significantly associated with LR. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to gross tumor volume, higher radiation dose delivered to the PTV predicts for better local/lobar control. We recommend that both PTVD95 BED10 >86 Gy and PTVmean BED10 >130 Gy should be considered for SABR plan optimization.
Authors: Bing Sun; Eric D Brooks; Ritsuko U Komaki; Zhongxing Liao; Melenda D Jeter; Mary F McAleer; Pamela K Allen; Peter A Balter; James D Welsh; Michael S O'Reilly; Daniel Gomez; Stephen M Hahn; Jack A Roth; Reza J Mehran; John V Heymach; Joe Y Chang Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-03-27 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Christos Moustakis; Oliver Blanck; Fatemeh Ebrahimi; Mark Ka Heng Chan; Iris Ernst; Thomas Krieger; Marciana-Nona Duma; Markus Oechsner; Ute Ganswindt; Christian Heinz; Horst Alheit; Hilbert Blank; Ursula Nestle; Rolf Wiehle; Christine Kornhuber; Christian Ostheimer; Cordula Petersen; Gerhard Pollul; Wolfgang Baus; Georg Altenstein; Eric Beckers; Katrin Jurianz; Florian Sterzing; Matthias Kretschmer; Heinrich Seegenschmiedt; Torsten Maass; Stefan Droege; Ulrich Wolf; Juergen Schoeffler; Uwe Haverkamp; Hans Eich; Matthias Guckenberger Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2017-09-15 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Eric D Brooks; Bing Sun; Lina Zhao; Ritsuko Komaki; Zhonxing Liao; Melenda Jeter; James W Welsh; Michael S O'Reilly; Daniel R Gomez; Stephen M Hahn; John V Heymach; David C Rice; Joe Y Chang Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2016-12-21 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Jingjing Kang; Matthew S Ning; Han Feng; Hongqi Li; Houda Bahig; Eric D Brooks; James W Welsh; Rui Ye; Hongyu Miao; Joe Y Chang Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2019-10-03 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Joe Y Chang; Reza J Mehran; Lei Feng; Vivek Verma; Zhongxing Liao; James W Welsh; Steven H Lin; Michael S O'Reilly; Melenda D Jeter; Peter A Balter; Stephen E McRae; Donald Berry; John V Heymach; Jack A Roth Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2021-09-13 Impact factor: 54.433
Authors: Michael S Binkley; Young-Jun Jeon; Monica Nesselbush; Everett J Moding; Barzin Y Nabet; Diego Almanza; Christian Kunder; Henning Stehr; Christopher H Yoo; Siyeon Rhee; Michael Xiang; Jacob J Chabon; Emily Hamilton; David M Kurtz; Linda Gojenola; Susie Grant Owen; Ryan B Ko; June Ho Shin; Peter G Maxim; Natalie S Lui; Leah M Backhus; Mark F Berry; Joseph B Shrager; Kavitha J Ramchandran; Sukhmani K Padda; Millie Das; Joel W Neal; Heather A Wakelee; Ash A Alizadeh; Billy W Loo; Maximilian Diehn Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2020-10-18 Impact factor: 38.272
Authors: Rene Baumann; Mark K H Chan; Florian Pyschny; Susanne Stera; Bettina Malzkuhn; Stefan Wurster; Stefan Huttenlocher; Marcella Szücs; Detlef Imhoff; Christian Keller; Panagiotis Balermpas; Dirk Rades; Claus Rödel; Jürgen Dunst; Guido Hildebrandt; Oliver Blanck Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2018-05-17 Impact factor: 6.244