BACKGROUND: The importance of physical activity for health is well-established. Questions remain whether outdoor exercise additionally benefits overall mental and physical well-being. METHODS: Using cross-sectional data from the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study, we examined relationships of physical activity environment (PAE) with reported tension, stress, emotional outlook, and health. RESULTS: 11,649 participants were included. 18% exercised indoors, 54% outdoors, and 28% in both. Participants who exercised partially or entirely outdoors exercised more. In fully adjusted models, for women combined PAE was protective for worse emotional outlook (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.52-0.98). Combined PAE was also protective for reported poor health (OR for women: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.44-0.91; OR for men: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.61-0.92). Amount of physical activity modified PAE relationships with outcomes. Combined and outdoor PAE were more consistently protective for worse outcomes among high activity participants. Regardless of PAE, better outcomes were observed in active versus inactive participants. CONCLUSION: The current study suggests addition of outdoor PAE may be linked with better stress management, outlook and health perceptions for more active populations, whereas indoor PAE may be more important for low active populations. Further research should examine the order of causation and whether type of outdoor PAE (eg, urban, natural) is important.
BACKGROUND: The importance of physical activity for health is well-established. Questions remain whether outdoor exercise additionally benefits overall mental and physical well-being. METHODS: Using cross-sectional data from the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study, we examined relationships of physical activity environment (PAE) with reported tension, stress, emotional outlook, and health. RESULTS: 11,649 participants were included. 18% exercised indoors, 54% outdoors, and 28% in both. Participants who exercised partially or entirely outdoors exercised more. In fully adjusted models, for women combined PAE was protective for worse emotional outlook (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.52-0.98). Combined PAE was also protective for reported poor health (OR for women: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.44-0.91; OR for men: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.61-0.92). Amount of physical activity modified PAE relationships with outcomes. Combined and outdoor PAE were more consistently protective for worse outcomes among high activity participants. Regardless of PAE, better outcomes were observed in active versus inactive participants. CONCLUSION: The current study suggests addition of outdoor PAE may be linked with better stress management, outlook and health perceptions for more active populations, whereas indoor PAE may be more important for low active populations. Further research should examine the order of causation and whether type of outdoor PAE (eg, urban, natural) is important.
Authors: Deborah A Cohen; Bing Han; Catherine J Nagel; Peter Harnik; Thomas L McKenzie; Kelly R Evenson; Terry Marsh; Stephanie Williamson; Christine Vaughan; Sweatha Katta Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2016-05-18 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Barbara Eigenschenk; Andreas Thomann; Mike McClure; Larissa Davies; Maxine Gregory; Ulrich Dettweiler; Eduard Inglés Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-03-15 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Mathieu Bélanger; François Gallant; Isabelle Doré; Jennifer L O'Loughlin; Marie-Pierre Sylvestre; Patrick Abi Nader; Richard Larouche; Katie Gunnell; Catherine M Sabiston Journal: Prev Med Rep Date: 2019-10-21
Authors: Éva Bácsné-Bába; Gergely Ráthonyi; Christa Pfau; Anetta Müller; György Norbert Szabados; Mónika Harangi-Rákos Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-04 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Míriam Rocher; Bruno Silva; Gonçalo Cruz; Renato Bentes; Josep Lloret; Eduard Inglés Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-11-16 Impact factor: 3.390