Literature DB >> 15694525

Increasing walking: how important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space?

Billie Giles-Corti1, Melissa H Broomhall, Matthew Knuiman, Catherine Collins, Kate Douglas, Kevin Ng, Andrea Lange, Robert J Donovan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Well-designed public open space (POS) that encourages physical activity is a community asset that could potentially contribute to the health of local residents.
METHODS: In 1995-1996, two studies were conducted-an environmental audit of POS over 2 acres (n =516) within a 408-km2 area of metropolitan Perth, Western Australia; and personal interviews with 1803 adults (aged 18 to 59 years) (52.9% response rate). The association between access to POS and physical activity was examined using three accessibility models that progressively adjusted for distance to POS, and its attractiveness and size. In 2002, an observational study examined the influence of attractiveness on the use of POS by observing users of three pairs of high- and low-quality (based on attractiveness) POS matched for size and location.
RESULTS: Overall, 28.8% of respondents reported using POS for physical activity. The likelihood of using POS increased with increasing levels of access, but the effect was greater in the model that adjusted for distance, attractiveness, and size. After adjustment, those with very good access to large, attractive POS were 50% more likely to achieve high levels of walking (odds ratio, 1.50; 95% confidence level, 1.06-2.13). The observational study showed that after matching POS for size and location, 70% of POS users observed visited attractive POS.
CONCLUSIONS: Access to attractive, large POS is associated with higher levels of walking. To increase walking, thoughtful design (and redesign) of POS is required that creates large, attractive POS with facilities that encourage active use by multiple users (e.g., walkers, sports participants, picnickers).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15694525     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  205 in total

1.  Mixed land use and obesity: an empirical comparison of alternative land use measures and geographic scales.

Authors:  Ikuho Yamada; Barbara B Brown; Ken R Smith; Cathleen D Zick; Lori Kowaleski-Jones; Jessie X Fan
Journal:  Prof Geogr       Date:  2012-04-03

2.  Environment and Physical Activity Dynamics: The Role of Residential Self-selection.

Authors:  Janne Boone-Heinonen; Penny Gordon-Larsen; David K Guilkey; David R Jacobs; Barry M Popkin
Journal:  Psychol Sport Exerc       Date:  2011-01-01

3.  Childhood obesity and proximity to urban parks and recreational resources: a longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Jennifer Wolch; Michael Jerrett; Kim Reynolds; Rob McConnell; Roger Chang; Nicholas Dahmann; Kirby Brady; Frank Gilliland; Jason G Su; Kiros Berhane
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 4.078

4.  The Benefits of Natural Environments for Physical Activity.

Authors:  Danielle F Shanahan; Lara Franco; Brenda B Lin; Kevin J Gaston; Richard A Fuller
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  The Impact of a Signalized Crosswalk on Traffic Speed and Street-Crossing Behaviors of Residents in an Underserved Neighborhood.

Authors:  Courtney L Schultz; Stephen P Sayers; Sonja A Wilhelm Stanis; Lori A Thombs; Ian M Thomas; Shannon M Canfield
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.671

6.  Urban area disadvantage and physical activity: a multilevel study in Melbourne, Australia.

Authors:  Anne M Kavanagh; Jane L Goller; Tania King; Damien Jolley; David Crawford; Gavin Turrell
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Neighbourhoods and health: a GIS approach to measuring community resource accessibility.

Authors:  Jamie Pearce; Karen Witten; Phil Bartie
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  The National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network Access to Parks Indicator: A National County-Level Measure of Park Proximity.

Authors:  Emily Neusel Ussery; Leah Yngve; Dee Merriam; Geoffrey Whitfield; Stephanie Foster; Arthur Wendel; Tegan Boehmer
Journal:  J Park Recreat Admi       Date:  2016

9.  Neighborhood environment and adherence to a walking intervention in African American women.

Authors:  Shannon N Zenk; Joellen Wilbur; Edward Wang; Judith McDevitt; April Oh; Richard Block; Sue McNeil; Nina Savar
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2008-07-31

Review 10.  Built environment correlates of walking: a review.

Authors:  Brian E Saelens; Susan L Handy
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.