Literature DB >> 27208981

Three-Year Longitudinal Survey Comparing Visual Satisfaction with LASIK and Contact Lenses.

Marianne O Price1, David A Price2, Frank A Bucci3, Daniel S Durrie4, William I Bond5, Francis W Price6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess patient satisfaction and perceived outcomes with different methods of refractive error correction through annual surveys administered over a 3-year period.
DESIGN: Prospective, longitudinal, parallel-group, multicenter survey. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1800 subjects, aged 18 to 60 years, who had LASIK or continued using contact lenses.
METHODS: Twenty sites across the United States enrolled subjects who completed a study-specific baseline survey during a contact lens examination or while being evaluated as a candidate for LASIK. Links to follow-up surveys were emailed annually for 3 years. Between-group differences were assessed by analysis of variance, and associations were assessed by logistic multivariate regression. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual satisfaction.
RESULTS: Of 1800 subjects, 694 (39%) comprised the control group who continued contact lens wear, 819 (45%) wore contacts at baseline and had LASIK, and 287 (16%) wore glasses at baseline and had LASIK. Most contact lens users had worn them successfully ≥5 years. The proportion expressing strong satisfaction with their current vision correction method decreased from 63% at baseline to 54% at year 3 in the contact lens control group, whereas 88% of former contact lens wearers and 77% of former glasses wearers were strongly satisfied with LASIK at year 3. Patients 40 years of age or younger when they had LASIK were somewhat more likely to be strongly satisfied than older patients. LASIK significantly reduced difficulties with night driving and nighttime visual disturbances among former contact lens users and former glasses users. The proportion with dry eye symptoms at 1, 2, or 3 years after LASIK was not significantly increased relative to baseline contact lens wear but was significantly increased relative to baseline glasses use, consistent with many glasses users having tried and abandoned contact lenses because of latent dry eye problems. Compared with continued contact lens wear, LASIK significantly reduced the self-reported rates of eye infections, ulcers, and abrasions each year.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with contact lens wear, current LASIK technology improved ease of night driving, did not significantly increase dry eye symptoms, and resulted in higher levels of satisfaction at 1, 2, and 3 years follow-up.
Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27208981     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of disk halo size after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Authors:  Tian Han; Feng Zhao; Xun Chen; Huamao Miao; Zhuoyi Chen; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Transepithelial versus epithelium-off corneal crosslinking for progressive keratoconus.

Authors:  Sueko M Ng; Mark Ren; Kristina B Lindsley; Barbara S Hawkins; Irene C Kuo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-23

3.  Patient satisfaction and self-reported dry eye symptoms in hyperopic patients treated with femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Petri Mäkinen; Anne Huhtala; Juhani Pietilä; Janika Nättinen; Teppo Rajala; Kalle Salmenhaara; Magomed Udratov; Hannu Uusitalo
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-04-26

4.  Comparing Patient-Reported Outcomes of Laser In Situ Keratomileusis and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction: A Review.

Authors:  Nathalie P Y Chiam; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct

5.  Revisiting the Robustness of Pentacam HR Indices Against Soft Contact Lens Wear.

Authors:  Rania Serag Elkitkat; Tamer Abdelfattah Badran; Weam Mohamed Ebeid
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-15

Review 6.  Call to action: treating dry eye disease and setting the foundation for successful surgery.

Authors:  Kendall Donaldson; Gregory Parkhurst; Bobby Saenz; Walter Whitley; Blake Williamson; John Hovanesian
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Quality of life impact of refractive correction (QIRC) results three years after SMILE and FS-LASIK.

Authors:  Tian Han; Ye Xu; Xiao Han; Jianmin Shang; Li Zeng; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 3.186

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.